does puntland represent the ethiopian vision 4 somalia?
Moderator: Moderators
Re: does puntland represent the ethiopian vision 4 somalia?
Libaax thanks for the info sxb but me and my debators fight politically with respect of the figures we are not waging clanish war we are somalis at the end so hopefully you post only your arguments without dissing particular clan atleast in this thread who's main topic is ethe ethiopian vision for somalia. Thanks.
Re: does puntland represent the ethiopian vision 4 somalia?
SSDF pushing for federalism didnt start in 1996 but in 1993 and it didnt start with Ethiopia calling for it but the United states. Like i said Puntland and Ethiopia just happen to agree on similar model and it just so happens that they have different interests behind it. Puntland in self autonomy and Ethiopia a weaker country. That is all.sahal80 wrote:Lol at the agenda is different!Estarix wrote:Their interest just happen to conflate but the agenda is different.
Before the ethiopian sodere conference wich suggested the federalism and clan-power sharing there were only SSDF!
All the TFG conferences in garowe was supposed to take place in boosaaso bc there were no garoowe yet!
Puntland itself is an ethiopian agenda let alone "her agenda"!
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Ifgx ... =html_text
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Ifgx ... =html_text
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=IXdq ... CB4Q6AEwBw
Say puntland is more collaporating with ethiopia!
Arabs were backing mogadishu centered initiative unil the TFG days for two reasons
Xamar folks have lost all their chances to establish a governmeent in mogadishu between 91-2007 when the jihadists appeared so they let ethiopia take mogadishu!
Since mj were against the arab backed TFG(ethiopian card), they got their chances in the ethiopian invasion and implementing the ethiopian project
Then the US has said there must be reconcilitian with sh sharif
He could have saved a lot but he was idiot, he's the man who appointed a man who was calling him a terrorist(gaas)
Gaas was running the govt and he made the transition like the road map, constitution that says mogadishu is not the capital
IGAD(ethiopia and kenya) have been sending a lot of misinforming reports to the west for the last decade about how somalia can not be ruled by a central govt
This govt basically has to do the things on that way but since its a permanent govt and only she does the things she can implement the map on her way also making them inclusive admins!
At least xamar folks have now two states plus banadir
Was supposed under gaas to have lesser states or losing the capital
Now there's a question about if he can keep his parts together!.
Re: does puntland represent the ethiopian vision 4 somalia?
We all know you border and live Jariiban and Garacad
Ths Hutu is the dumbest character in all of snet. Your people don't live in north Mudug. North Mudug belongs to Dal Udug every body knows that. You just can't claim other people's land on the net sac sac aad ceeb. I'll be back later to karbasash you my slave. -
quark
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 7820
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:22 pm
- Location: Xarunta Xisbiga Gooni Isu Taaga Dal udug
Re: does puntland represent the ethiopian vision 4 somalia?
libaaxyare wrote:Abdiwahab where is North Mudug? We all know you border and live Jariiban and Garacad so where is North Mudug? Goldogob? Allah gave HG wealthy land where uranium sits on top of the earth. Its those leelkase who are comming to join HG but our policy is not even included Cabudwaaq. Central state its Hawiye state and Hawiye lands. Time to seal the border garacad and jariibanAbwab252 wrote:Sahal, so why does a Hawiye President always oppose a Hawiye regional state. Sheik sharia split Hiiraan in two states after he lost. Hasan opposed this agreement yet allowed a Darood Jubaland which only exists inside Kismayo and then he allows North Mudug not to be included in a Central State. Also do not forget, he allowed Lower Shabelle, a Hawiye state to be carved into a Eelay one.
This nigga is smoking some good shit-
HusseinHassan
- SomaliNet Heavyweight

- Posts: 2980
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:12 pm
- Location: Somalinet boycott by Puntites in effect 24/12/14
Re: does puntland represent the ethiopian vision 4 somalia?
libaaxyare wrote:Abdiwahab where is North Mudug? We all know you border and live Jariiban and Garacad so where is North Mudug? Goldogob? Allah gave HG wealthy land where uranium sits on top of the earth. Its those leelkase who are comming to join HG but our policy is not even included Cabudwaaq. Central state its Hawiye state and Hawiye lands. Time to seal the border garacad and jariibanAbwab252 wrote:Sahal, so why does a Hawiye President always oppose a Hawiye regional state. Sheik sharia split Hiiraan in two states after he lost. Hasan opposed this agreement yet allowed a Darood Jubaland which only exists inside Kismayo and then he allows North Mudug not to be included in a Central State. Also do not forget, he allowed Lower Shabelle, a Hawiye state to be carved into a Eelay one.
- blizzard90
- SomaliNetizen

- Posts: 872
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2014 9:21 am
- Location: The art of Hating
Re: does puntland represent the ethiopian vision 4 somalia?
Garacad was always a sacad majority degaan, the lies you've been fed are slowly unfolding before your eyes
- Khalid Ali
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 32743
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 11:03 am
- Location: Suldaan Emperior Gacanyarihisa
Re: does puntland represent the ethiopian vision 4 somalia?
sahal80 wrote:Khalid
Sxb nothing is new when it comes to mudug issue
Gaas said to the govt explain your position
Govt said south of mudug
This is true and that was her position for this interim era bc we are not yet in the federal era
There is no such a federal state yet including pl
According to vision2016, the interim states should be formed before december, still one remains(hiiraan and middle shabelle)
Now before octobar 2016, the federal states should be formed as part of other national agendas like the constitution and referendum and the elections
In that era mudug have to belong one side and this will be decided by a commission from the parliament that was formed by the justice minister
Punland or as their larger clan have one member, thus, I expect to join the central state
It will be like being against the constitution who states this!
Nick has said it depends on that commission
Take into consideration that hassan sheikh will not be under pressure in his last days but now he needs to get the world support for his good policy!
I was refering to puntlands plan to have the somali capital bc of certain clan won't be able to have equal states in the upper parliament(the house of elders from the states) without letting them have the capital
Their plan was hiiraan, galgaduud and south of galkacyo forming one state and another state comprises middle shabelle and banadir!
Now you got galgaduud+mudug state and hiiraan+middle shabelle state plus the capital!
And they have puntland+jubaland
And what's funny is that mogadishu is planning for the post-2016 that banadir region should have elections so it will not work for a non natives to represent her districts!.
I have a clue of how pl will look like in the federal era but I don't wanna to state this yet
There will be some larger compromise.
Its Farax topaz hand into this because it would not be something a Hawiye would see Farah topaz is idea of governing Somalia is to allow clan regions emerge but that are under Mogadishu so the bay and bakool and lower shabelle will still answer to Mogadishu they wont have their own army. The same way the SFG placed the Jubba admin under the SFG jurisdiction so this gives him time to sort out the federal structure from a constitutional point of view .So these states are all states but they have one stronger republic the SFG government that runs them, and the only autonomous state in Somalia will be Puntland, where the rest the other 11 province come under Mogadishu jurisdiction politically socially militarily.
Its as you pointed out Hassan sheikh and his strongest adviser farah topaz have this idea to entertain the Federalism formula at the same time there is parallel agenda, to make sure that Mogadishu is empowered politically with the help of the Diplomatic muscle they have particularly from Arab states and the European Union. The Clash political clash will emerge though sooner or later maybe just a little bit before 2016 because some how the Constitutional will create problems for Puntland to be precise because its the only independent autonomous state in Somalia. And this is where Ethiopia can come in Ethiopia will use Puntland to excersise leverage over Mogadishu.
Khalid Ali AkA Gacanyare
Re: does puntland represent the ethiopian vision 4 somalia?
In somalia there are three political clans: hiraab, isaaq and majeerten
Hiraab have lost their chances
Isaaq had their own project backed by non one so how can it work? The talks are the only way since there's no recognition
Mj represent the ethiopian/kenyan/IGAD policies in somalia against mogadishu/central state
They succeed in this with the help of ethiopia/IGAD who convinced the UN and the world
Now somalia is a federal country bc of mj and behind them ethiopia so this govt has to act this way
However, this govt is trying to implement the federalism on her way(new federal map/federalization from mogadishu) and make it look like doesn't work like the mudug issue and if it does work puntland would have accepted it so I guess mudug will decide the case of federalism
The Reporter - English Edition - Mogadishu Government and the duo mandate of Damul Jadiid cult: A new formula of desolation to Somalia's peace http://www.thereporterethiopia.com/inde ... lias-peace
Also this govt has eliminated PL politically(her jubbaland agenda, the cabinet)
SOMALIA: Ethiopia opens consulate in Puntland - Horseed Media http://horseedmedia.net/2010/05/30/soma ... -puntland/
Hiraab have lost their chances
Isaaq had their own project backed by non one so how can it work? The talks are the only way since there's no recognition
Mj represent the ethiopian/kenyan/IGAD policies in somalia against mogadishu/central state
They succeed in this with the help of ethiopia/IGAD who convinced the UN and the world
Now somalia is a federal country bc of mj and behind them ethiopia so this govt has to act this way
However, this govt is trying to implement the federalism on her way(new federal map/federalization from mogadishu) and make it look like doesn't work like the mudug issue and if it does work puntland would have accepted it so I guess mudug will decide the case of federalism
The Reporter - English Edition - Mogadishu Government and the duo mandate of Damul Jadiid cult: A new formula of desolation to Somalia's peace http://www.thereporterethiopia.com/inde ... lias-peace
Also this govt has eliminated PL politically(her jubbaland agenda, the cabinet)
SOMALIA: Ethiopia opens consulate in Puntland - Horseed Media http://horseedmedia.net/2010/05/30/soma ... -puntland/
- LiquidHYDROGEN
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 14522
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 10:48 am
- Location: Back home in Old Kush
Re: does puntland represent the ethiopian vision 4 somalia?
Sahal, if you had the choice what would you go for instead of federalism?
-
Sophisticate
- SomaliNet Heavyweight

- Posts: 3037
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 12:09 am
Re: does puntland represent the ethiopian vision 4 somalia?
You aren't even familiar with Zaylaci culture and your people have never been well represented in Awdal and never were, replace that with Samaroon or Cisse and you are on to something. It was the Samaroon that first dealt with the English and had treaties with them. Zaylac was rather self-sustaining in those days so the English really couldn't provide anything of substance to the locals.Khalid Ali wrote:First of all hutu kid libaaxnyare darwish was not a qabill organization four out of the five leaders of the. Dervishes were isaaq second there has never been a samale entity sacad was sacad sauuur was sauuur xawaadle and gaaljecel were just seperate qabiiils
And dervishes did not exist present colonial dervish emerged 1899.
Its like saying shabaab is a qabil organization
Historically before the British came isaaq ruled over zeila to awdal qadiful somaal sharmarke salih
I don't care what you and your majeerreen cousins do
But don't include us into your mess
Thanks
Last edited by Sophisticate on Thu Oct 16, 2014 3:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
- LiquidHYDROGEN
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 14522
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 10:48 am
- Location: Back home in Old Kush
Re: does puntland represent the ethiopian vision 4 somalia?
^^^Zeila was destroyed by a HY adventurer and a handful of men with rifles. It can't have been that self-sufficient.
-
Sophisticate
- SomaliNet Heavyweight

- Posts: 3037
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 12:09 am
Re: does puntland represent the ethiopian vision 4 somalia?
It was not. Habar Yonis had no presence there. That is both historically inaccurate and geographically doesn't make sense. If you said Habar Awal that would be more believable quit clowning, you aren't from galbeed. This dude is a rebel without a cause or common sense.
Secondly it was self-sustain because it was a commercial/trading hub then. It didn't need anything from the English. They merely packed their bags and headed to Berbera.
Zaylac port was merely abandoned for the Djibouti one. It's pretty much a ghost town now.
Secondly it was self-sustain because it was a commercial/trading hub then. It didn't need anything from the English. They merely packed their bags and headed to Berbera.
Zaylac port was merely abandoned for the Djibouti one. It's pretty much a ghost town now.
- Hawdian
- SomaliNet Heavyweight

- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 8:02 pm
- Location: Berbera to Tis Abay with one step.
Re: does puntland represent the ethiopian vision 4 somalia?
Sophisticate,
In 1840, Hajji Sharmarke Ali Salah, a HY, became the governor of Zeila. At first he was challenged by a Habar Awal in Berbera but eventually he too accepted the authority of Hajji Sharmarke who was a wealthy merchant. When the British had landed onshore, he was bombarding Zeila with rifles and Ottoman cannons. He dismantled much of the city's infrastructure including its water system.
He was later challenged by another Habar Awal Sultan in Hargeisa (then called Harar). The locals also upraised against him after they were told he was a British spy. After 15 years of ruling he was replaced by an Afar man called Abu Baker who was from Tadjoura region. He was heavily involved in the slave trade.
After Hajji Sharmarke, Zeila never recovered and the Isaac begun building Berbera. Berbera's later link to Aden, which was the Dubai of that era, also isolated Zeila then later Ras Makonnen of Ethiopia commissioned the port of Djibouti with the French.
Ras
In 1840, Hajji Sharmarke Ali Salah, a HY, became the governor of Zeila. At first he was challenged by a Habar Awal in Berbera but eventually he too accepted the authority of Hajji Sharmarke who was a wealthy merchant. When the British had landed onshore, he was bombarding Zeila with rifles and Ottoman cannons. He dismantled much of the city's infrastructure including its water system.
He was later challenged by another Habar Awal Sultan in Hargeisa (then called Harar). The locals also upraised against him after they were told he was a British spy. After 15 years of ruling he was replaced by an Afar man called Abu Baker who was from Tadjoura region. He was heavily involved in the slave trade.
After Hajji Sharmarke, Zeila never recovered and the Isaac begun building Berbera. Berbera's later link to Aden, which was the Dubai of that era, also isolated Zeila then later Ras Makonnen of Ethiopia commissioned the port of Djibouti with the French.
Ras
Re: does puntland represent the ethiopian vision 4 somalia?
I'm against any tribal governance, tribal based states/tribal parties etcLiquidHYDROGEN wrote:Sahal, if you had the choice what would you go for instead of federalism?
Secondly I'm for decentralized governance but not federalism, sort of the local governments/regional authorities/county councils that exisit in europe except for germany and switzerland
Switzerland is a federacy bc of her languages and ethnicities
Germany bc it was never united historically rather there were many states until a century ago then you got the ideological division and being divided by the super powers
Federalism is for people who share no culture, language etc.
Ethiopia had this ethnic-based federalism so she suggested a similar form for somalia wich is a clan-based federalism
Economically, the ethiopian regions are better but there's no democracy and are controlled by one party who uses the army
Even this role of the state ethiopia doesn't want for somalia!
The clan-based federalism in somalia is very dangerous bc galbahaarey will be managed by kismayo and connected to her, the same thing goes to every town and village
We will have a new generations that don't share common culture and identity
In this system we can have local governments and common political life such as the parties etc
Plus each region/province can have local authorities instead of fighting on one administration
Kenya has this system
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_au ... s_of_Kenya
Last edited by sahal80 on Thu Oct 16, 2014 5:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
- LiquidHYDROGEN
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 14522
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 10:48 am
- Location: Back home in Old Kush
Re: does puntland represent the ethiopian vision 4 somalia?
Walaal open up a history book. Just because HY don't settle in Zeila/Awdal doesn't mean they can't get there. There are no physical barriers stopping them. Secondly, I didn't claim HY settled there. I said a HY swashbuckler ( Haji Sharmarke)conquered the famous Zeila with a few men armed with rifles. Zeila was in decline since the portuguese attack but Haji Sharmarke's conquest pretty much ended it. It's sad really, it would've made a great city.sophisticate wrote:It was not. Habar Yonis had no presence there. That is both historically inaccurate and geographically doesn't make sense. If you said Habar Awal that would be more believable quit clowning, you aren't from galbeed. This dude is a rebel without a cause or common sense.![]()
Secondly it was self-sustain because it was a commercial/trading hub then. It didn't need anything from the English. They merely packed their bags and headed to Berbera.
Zaylac port was merely abandoned for the Djibouti one. It's pretty much a ghost town now.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 20 Replies
- 2514 Views
-
Last post by GAMES
-
- 2 Replies
- 416 Views
-
Last post by hanqadh
-
- 17 Replies
- 1374 Views
-
Last post by Buckshot
-
- 4 Replies
- 669 Views
-
Last post by Coeus
-
- 13 Replies
- 1389 Views
-
Last post by Saeedlfc
-
- 8 Replies
- 624 Views
-
Last post by smooth
-
- 0 Replies
- 286 Views
-
Last post by paidmonk
-
- 5 Replies
- 686 Views
-
Last post by AhlulbaytSoldier
-
- 7 Replies
- 695 Views
-
Last post by LaY-D_LicK
-
- 1 Replies
- 399 Views
-
Last post by AbdiWahab252