What does that meanKeyblade wrote:inb4 10 more pages in quick succession
I tried looking it upp but I didn't understand the whole sentence
Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators
What does that meanKeyblade wrote:inb4 10 more pages in quick succession

Shit, forgot your name. Korea?wolverine wrote:People that support childmarriage or see their moral source as marrying 6 year old, discussing sexual morality.
And I cant point out the amount of muffasireen and ulama that supported the most disturbing things on a child, as long as their was no penetration, which was approved at the age of 9 years. I wouldn't be suprised if some of these ulama where quoted on this thread.

First and foremost, the prophets example is part of the sharia. If he married a 6 year old, it became legal for all time. Do you think it should be legal in a Somalia country? In fact I wouldn't be suprised if all the great mufassireen, had deeply disturbing interpretations and the same goes for the madhahib.Wolverine it was completely fine to do so in those times, you focus on our blessed Prophet (SAW) however it was the norm and European Kings did wed young girls.
One of the things Aisha told according to hadith was that she was playing with dolls while married to the prophet. Deeply disturbing.Unlike what your type of people would like us to think, Aisha turned out to become the biggest narrator of the Prophet's (SAW) ahadith and the most beloved of his wives. Indeed the wisdom is with Allah.

Not according to the great mufasiriin and the different madhabs. Many of them and said went even further, that a man could marry a 1 year old. And the Sharia stands for all time. Which is disturbing. Also the fact that she was mature is not a given, on the contrary.^ you can't be f.ucking serious mann??? seriously you ask this same question in every dam thread you retarded or something.
you think your so smart talking sh.it, the conditions prophet muhammad(pbuh) lived in 1400 years ago does not apply today. women then developed maturity and responsibility at much younger ages. there is a biological/psychological difference of women 1400 years ago and today. what part of that don't you get?
Also, grandpakhalif gave his full support and miskeen85 insinuated also that he supported it. Also there are several ulama that still support it.Where did I claim that it should be forbidden?? Surely you have comprehension issues, once again it was the norm back then and wouldn't have shocked anyone however in 2012 this is completely rejected by western society however 2 men marrying and adopting a poor child is completely accepted...The latter is certainly more disturbing yet you support it with great pride. I wonder why.
Edit: that probably happens in Somalia and i'm 100% fine with it however what will never be accepted in Somalia is 2 men humping each other.


MJMrSinister wrote:before i defend or insult this khanis, what is his qabil?