Well said ureyso.Ureysoo wrote:It depends on the outlook and definition of "Feminism". The objective of early feminist movements was 2 equalize men and women in various fields (employment, education, etc). I think it was essential 2 fight certain norms, ideologies and typecasts in order 2 attain some sort of egalitarianism. Nevertheless, feminists went off the rails, after the radical feminism occurred. That movement encouraged females individualism and the thought of boycotting men 2 ensure women leadership. Something which I find impossible 2 attain, since the 2 faces of the coin can't be separated, otherwise it will lose value, significance and shape. Beside men and women are out there 2 complete each other, given that each gender has particular role 2 fulfill. Therefore, it's only fair and safe 2 sacrifice and ditch certain principles 2 stay in course and not go astray. So, I say --- "Hell 2 gender equality, if it corrupts our sense of morality"....
Nothing wrong with men and women being equal but not the same, the problem becomes when women want to compete with men instead of complementing them
