SomaliNet Forums

So you don't consider SSC a terrorist organization but rather a resistance movement against the Somaliland government

Well so far ssc has not openly embraced alshabaab so there is no reason to call them terrorist or extremist , but they are an resistance movement them self’s

Emperior,

What makes Shabaab terrorists, and the warlords not?

I know the answer but I wanna hear yours

The_Emperior5 wrote:

So you don't consider SSC a terrorist organization but rather a resistance movement against the Somaliland government

Well so far ssc has not openly embraced alshabaab so there is no reason to call them terrorist or extremist , but they are an resistance movement them self’s

would you consider them terrorist if they impose shariica in the area's they control?

Shirib wrote:Emperior,

What makes Shabaab terrorists, and the warlords not?

I know the answer but I wanna hear yours

The word terrorism is often used For only Islamic rebels or people with an Islamic agenda , but the reason why I call them terrorist is not because of their religious background but because they terrorise The people of Somalia and in the horn of Africa suicide bombings in Uganda Somaliland etc and also even in Somalia ,killing Muslims they say they are protecting that’s why I call them terrorist, I never called Alshabaab or the resistance movements that were fighting the Ethiopian occupation terrorist but what they are now doing is unacceptable

abdisamad3 wrote:

The_Emperior5 wrote:

So you don't consider SSC a terrorist organization but rather a resistance movement against the Somaliland government

Well so far ssc has not openly embraced alshabaab so there is no reason to call them terrorist or extremist , but they are an resistance movement them self’s

would you consider them terrorist if they impose shariica in the area's they control?

No i would call faisal ali waraabe a terrorist he wantd the same for somaliland so no Sharia law doesent make you a terrorist but if you Kill people that dont support your Moverment and you wish to Terrorise people then you are a terrorist

The_Emperior5 wrote:

Shirib wrote:Emperior,

What makes Shabaab terrorists, and the warlords not?

I know the answer but I wanna hear yours

The word terrorism is often used For only Islamic rebels or people with an Islamic agenda , but the reason why I call them terrorist is not because of their religious background but because they terrorise The people of Somalia and in the horn of Africa suicide bombings in Uganda Somaliland etc and also even in Somalia ,killing Muslims they say they are protecting that’s why I call them terrorist, I never called Alshabaab or the resistance movements that were fighting the Ethiopian occupation terrorist but what they are now doing is unacceptable

laakin Emperioroow, u never called the warlords terrorists. Didn't they terrorize civilians and Somalia. Why do u not refer to them as terrorists, but u call Shabaab terrorists. What's the difference?

gaalada waxii Islam sheegto waa terrorists,ku waas hala mid noqonin

We call the warlords mooryaans tuug and yes they used to terrorise the civilians but the warlords xaqdaradooda ay sameyn jireen they didn’t say it’s the word from our lord that’s the difference

The_Emperior5 wrote:We call the warlords mooryaans tuug and yes they used to terrorise the civilians but the warlords xaqdaradooda ay sameyn jireen they didn’t say it’s the word from our lord that’s the difference

marka terrorist waa waxii Islam sheegto soo ma aha?

Timothy Mc Veigh was a terrorist...

Terrorist waxa weye qofka maanta diinta wax ku dila , that doesn’t take away that the warlordski anay terrorist ahayn laakin iyagu terrorisnimadoodu may ahayn ilahay ba nugu yidhi dadka diila but anaga iska dilnay . eeg waxa jira tan world terrorism somalia was one of the countries warlords lahayd laakin kuwan kale eeh diinta beenta ka sheegeya are every where that’s the difference

Al-Shabaab fits the description of any definition of the word "Terrorism".

Somalia: Puntland forces conquer militants hideout "Galgala"
9 Aug 9, 2010 - 4:50:53 AM



Authorities in Somalia’s semi-autonmous state of Puntland say its forces have successfully captured Galgala Mountains in the war against militants linked to Al-Qaeda-inspired Al-Shabaab.

The army launched the offensive more than a week ago to annihilate the militants, led by Mohamed Said Atom, who is on a UN Security Council watch list, from the mountainous region, which they wanted to transform it into African Tora Bora.

Authorities said that in offensives, the dozens of militants were killed, bringing a level of calm to the mountainous region. It is not however clear the exact figure of casualties from the clashes.

Reports indicate that security forces are carrying out security operations while sporadic gunfire can still be heard in the far areas.

Garowe Online will bring every details of this developing story as soon as it gets out.

GAROWE ONLINE

nomadicwarlord wrote:Al-Shabaab fits the description of any definition of the word "Terrorism".

The_Emperior5 wrote:Terrorist waxa weye qofka maanta diinta wax ku dila , that doesn’t take away that the warlordski anay terrorist ahayn laakin iyagu terrorisnimadoodu may ahayn ilahay ba nugu yidhi dadka diila but anaga iska dilnay . eeg waxa jira tan world terrorism somalia was one of the countries warlords lahayd laakin kuwan kale eeh diinta beenta ka sheegeya are every where that’s the difference

Hey buddy stop dodging the question, u never called the warlords terrorists, why are u starting now, or have u adopted the theory that only those who claim to be fighting in the name of Islam are terrorists

But shirib the topic was about the alshabaab cell in bari region , and that’s why I called them terrorist
adiga warlordska so dhex gelieye the warlords maanta somalia kama jiran i would call them terrorist 15 years ago maanta ma jiraan laakin