Re: France: Iran risks attack if it continues to develop nuc
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 6:47 pm
Saudis would probably support an attack on Iran.
Largest online Somali community!
http://somalinet.com/forums/
union wrote:Samatr
Of course I will support the interests of the United States.
This is the country I was born and grew up in, and the country i will live and work and die in.
Iran is the enemy of the free world and a nation lead by theocratic nutjobs. India is the world's biggest democracy and one lead by educated, rational thinking people. There is no comparison!
Exactly, the only country that TESTED its NUCLEAR POWER on another was the US of Aseemeyer wrote:Iran which hasn't invaded another country for thousands of years is irresponsible
Yet the Jewnited States which invaded countless countries in the las 100
Used biological agents against it's own citizens
Nuked Japan to smithereens
Lied about WMDs in Iraq
Lied about Vietnamese aggression to start a war,is
We shouldnt wish for the end of the world sxb or Qiyamaha, its not good.1nemansquad
Frenchies can't and wont attack Iran, empty threats but I hope they do; it would be the end of this world as we know it.
Gaalo iyo Musim baa loo kala bixi
seemeyer wrote:Iran which hasn't invaded another country for thousands of years is irresponsible
Yet the Jewnited States which invaded countless countries in the las 100
Used biological agents against it's own citizens
Nuked Japan to smithereens
Lied about WMDs in Iraq
Lied about Vietnamese aggression to start a war,is
union wrote:Like what? I bet you're going to bring up the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but that was needed to conclude WWII without shedding millions of more lives. It would have been extremely bloody to invade the Japanese mainland and remove the Japanese government which has been responsible for such crimes as the rape of Najing, the forced colonization of Eastern Asia, the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, and not to mention they had allied themselves with the most evil ideology ever born to man, Nazism.
Non sequiturSaraxnow wrote:union wrote:Like what? I bet you're going to bring up the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but that was needed to conclude WWII without shedding millions of more lives. It would have been extremely bloody to invade the Japanese mainland and remove the Japanese government which has been responsible for such crimes as the rape of Najing, the forced colonization of Eastern Asia, the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, and not to mention they had allied themselves with the most evil ideology ever born to man, Nazism.
There goes Secularism for you.
No justification WHATSOEVER for taking innocent lives![]()
![]()
Saraxnow wrote:union wrote:Like what? I bet you're going to bring up the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but that was needed to conclude WWII without shedding millions of more lives. It would have been extremely bloody to invade the Japanese mainland and remove the Japanese government which has been responsible for such crimes as the rape of Najing, the forced colonization of Eastern Asia, the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, and not to mention they had allied themselves with the most evil ideology ever born to man, Nazism.
There goes Secularism for you. The whole materialistic shallow world-view of Nationalism and this ''American blood'' being worth more than these Japanese civilians.
No justification WHATSOEVER for taking innocent lives![]()
![]()
I don't mean as THE END, that we've no control of regardless of which country attack which; what i mean however is BATTLE RELIGIOUS LINES will be drawn and religious wars will take place almost everywhere in this world. The LIE which is (Iran is a radical government) wont fly anymore even with the puppet Muslim leaders across th globeSaraxnow wrote:We shouldnt wish for the end of the world sxb or Qiyamaha, its not good
djibsomali wrote:shia are the original muslim
not the same as those corrupted sunni