SomaliNet Forums

Kukri wrote:

Everytime i see this photo i cringe, this man, the so called ruler of hijaz, a embarrassment to the deen

Why do you say the world is going to end in 30 years, AbuukarSubeer?

union wrote:Why do you say the world is going to end in 30 years, AbuukarSubeer?

a fool and a crackpot who thinks he can predict major signs exact time.

Do you dislike AbuukarSubeer simply because he doesn't like Abdullah or do you have other disagreements with him too?

union wrote:Why do you say the world is going to end in 30 years, AbuukarSubeer?

I wouldn't say 30 years, my prediction and opinion on the matter would be around 2070ish, one of the major signs is the return to the golden age, when Isreal takes over USA the world would be in a different way then today, and i see that in 30 years, it takes a long explanation, maybe sometime i go over a conference call with you and grandpakhalif i'll explain it all.

union wrote:Do you dislike AbuukarSubeer simply because he doesn't like Abdullah or do you have other disagreements with him too?

the guy is a nut he thinks all muslim rulers are kaafirs (excluding his beloved siilaanyo of course) and interprets the Qur'an arbitrarily according to his will. He is also a fan of extremist suufis who promote shirk like Hamza Yusuf and Habib Jifri. Let's not forget his undying loyalty to the Malaysian nut Imran Hossein.

This guy is a mix of terrorism, suufism and crazy conspiracy theries. May Allah help him.

AbuukarSubeer wrote:

Kukri wrote:

Everytime i see this photo i cringe, this man, the so called ruler of hijaz, a embarrassment to the deen

He doesn't represent the deen nor the Ummah. King Abdullah is run of the mill Arab camel fucker intoxicated on zionist sperm.

Grandpa Please we all know Kuwait was in the wrong, for they were stealing oil within Iraqi borders using "Slant Oil drilling", and negotiations before the first gulf war between Iraq and Kuwait were going on the issue wasn't whether the theft was occuring, but how much of it was taken.

"Kuwaiti Crown Prince Saad al-Abdallah al-Sabah "recognised the theft in 1990 during negotiations between Iraq and Kuwait in Saudi Arabia," preceding the invasion."


Iraq even took their case to the UN and even then no one did anything, so it had no other choice but to invade Kuwait. At the same time Iraq never invaded Saudi Arabia, even though it had troops on the borders.

Funny thing is after the Iraq war, what happened to the borders: In 1990, Iraq accused Kuwait of stealing Iraq's oil through slant drilling.[citation needed] The United Nations redrew the border after the 1991 Gulf war that liberated Kuwait from a seven-month Iraqi occupation under former leader Saddam Hussein. It placed 11 oil wells, some farms and an old naval base that used to be in Iraq on the Kuwaiti side

And when did Saddam become a communist kaffir? Was it before or After King Fahd gave a Kalshinkov to Saddam Hussein?


And why is this guy trying to make it seem like it was the Ulema who gave permission to the Saudi King's to let the Americans in, when in reality it was they who just gave a fatwa after the decision was made. Biggest Joke in history.

So, in truth, it is not that the Saudi's were with the oppressed people against the aggressors, but they willingly helped and abated the aggressors with their agenda. They helped the stealing kuwaitis get more land and more oil to sell to the Americas at a cheap price, that is your precious Saudi. And what the hell is Saudi Arabia spending billions in buying weapons from America and other western countries if they won't ever use them? Why do they have a military? Especially if they are going to pay countries like the US to fight their wars, and we all know that Saudi Arabia paid at least half the cost incurred by the united states. Damn!!! LOL @ this Abukhadeeji guy trying to rewrite history.

Grandpakhalif, i challenge you, to prove me why Hamza yusuf and Sayid Habib Ali Jufri promote Shirk, you prove me, not Abu Khadeejah but you.

PO Kuwait and Saudi could do no wrong in my eyes if Saddam invaded and pillaged their cities.

AbuukarSubeer wrote:Grandpakhalif, i challenge you, to prove me why Hamza yusuf and Sayid Habib Ali Jufri promote Shirk, you prove me, not Abu Khadeejah but you.

And how am i in any way a terrorist?, since when did i justify the killing of innocence, why are you accusing me of something i am not, while on the other hand, i can bring forth quotes from what your wrote of you praising the hell-bound militia al-shabab for their attacks on innocent people. I warn you, do not accuse me of something i did not do or of something i am not.

AbuukarSubeer wrote:

union wrote:Why do you say the world is going to end in 30 years, AbuukarSubeer?

I wouldn't say 30 years, my prediction and opinion on the matter would be around 2070ish, one of the major signs is the return to the golden age, when Isreal takes over USA the world would be in a different way then today, and i see that in 30 years, it takes a long explanation, maybe sometime i go over a conference call with you and grandpakhalif i'll explain it all.

When are you going to debate grandpakhalif on the conference line?

grandpakhalif wrote:PO Kuwait and Saudi could do no wrong in my eyes if Saddam invaded and pillaged their cities.

LOOOOL bro, who did wrong first is what we are at. Kuwait did. Saddam never pillaged any cities in Saudia Arabai.

union wrote:

AbuukarSubeer wrote:

union wrote:Why do you say the world is going to end in 30 years, AbuukarSubeer?

I wouldn't say 30 years, my prediction and opinion on the matter would be around 2070ish, one of the major signs is the return to the golden age, when Isreal takes over USA the world would be in a different way then today, and i see that in 30 years, it takes a long explanation, maybe sometime i go over a conference call with you and grandpakhalif i'll explain it all.

When are you going to debate grandpakhalif on the conference line?

Very soon bro, very soon.