Sheikh Imran Hosein

[misterioso]

Com'on. You recently asked evidence of you takfiring Alawis/Shias, which I provided. Do you want me to dig the forum again? Maybe you've memory issues.

[Kukri]

(kukri, AbokorSuber, Rightwing, etc) admire Sheikh Imran Hosein. Coincidentally, those individuals also side with Syria, Iran and Shias.

You made it sound like we are supporting the devil himself, but for your information i do not support Shia for their believe but for their raganimo which is more than can be said for the Sunnis of today.

Sheikh Imran Hosein is one of the greatest Islamic scholars of our time (may Allah keep him safe) and the only Sheikh that has the guts to call a spade a spade.

[misterioso]

Sheikh Imran Hosein is one of the greatest Islamic scholars of our time (may Allah keep him safe) and the only Sheikh that has the guts to call a spade a spade.

Cite 5 examples where he called a spade a spade.

[gurey25]

Com'on. You recently asked evidence of you takfiring Alawis/Shias, which I provided. Do you want me to dig the forum again? Maybe you've memory issues.

how does quoting facts about alawis = me supporting isreal??
allawis are remnants of the pre-islamic population that chose to continue their beliefs by hiding as shia, and avoiding muslim government interference. there used to be dozens of groups like them, mostly extinct.
the allawis, and alevis are one of the few remaining.
Ask any shia and he will confirm that no shia considers them to be even muslim.

[misterioso]

In a recent comment, you claimed Alawis/Shias aren't kuffar. I brought up evidence where in the past, you multiple times called them as such. Here, you deny something, yet there's evidence in the forum to incriminate you. Hence, quoting facts about alawis = you supporting israel.

[Kukri]

Whats with you and your obsession with "5 examples">

1. He speaks the truth about Israel and their evil intentions without fear.
2. He speaks the truth about the Judeo-Christian alliance and their intentions towards the Muslim world.
3. He speaks the truth about the nature of Muslim brotherhood and their misguided nature.
4. He speaks the truth about the situation in Syria and call it what it is (about the CIA salafi scums).
5. He speaks the truth about the current state of the confused Ummah and warns about sectarian wars between Muslims and to support Iran in the face of western aggression in regards to their nuclear programme.

[gurey25]

In a recent comment, you claimed Alawis/Shias aren't kuffar. I brought up evidence where in the past, you multiple times called them as such. Here, you deny something, yet there's evidence in the forum to incriminate you. Hence, quoting facts about alawis = you supporting israel.

ok then the archives are here, go and quote me.
i make a distinction between alawis and shia, i consider both 12wer and some ismaili shia like the bohra to as muslim as myself.

[LeJusticier]

I don't agree with all his theories but i do respect him.
There is no side to support in syria, both are doing abominable things to innocents.
but i will always one should be wary when Saudia/USA/Western Europe and Isreal are squarely on the same side.

my bet would be to support the side that they are fighting.

Co sign.

[gurey25]

i find that the shiekh places to much emphasis on isreal, when it is only an important cog in the great machine.
i agree with his yajuuj and majuuj theory it fits with arthur koestlers 13th tribe(khazar) theory.
which was descredited by the academic community. but get this!! new genetic evidence from the past 3 years have re-ignited the debate. (data shows that most ashkhenazim cluster closer with the turkish and caucasian population than to other semites)

i do not agree with his dajjal theory, i think it is too fancifull and no clear cut.

[misterioso]

ok then the archives are here, go and quote me.
i make a distinction between alawis and shia, i consider both 12wer and some ismaili shia like the bohra to as muslim as myself.

There's more; you flipflop. You recently changed that distinction you make, and as a result, no longer consider Alawis to be kuffar. You probably don't remember when we discussed it (1-2 weeks ago), so I don't see how evidence from the archives would help since you've memory issues.

[gurey25]

ok then the archives are here, go and quote me.
i make a distinction between alawis and shia, i consider both 12wer and some ismaili shia like the bohra to as muslim as myself.

There's more; you flipflop. You recently changed that distinction you make, and as a result, no longer consider Alawis to be kuffar. You probably don't remember when we discussed it (1-2 weeks ago), so I don't see how evidence from the archives would help since you've memory issues.

either search the archives and post my words or shut it.
you keep making accusation and the evidence is here for everyone yet you do not bring it?

[misterioso]

I've already brought up evidence of takfiring Alawis/Shias and you run away from the other topic. In the same topic, there was evidence of flipflopping. I've already completed the search and got the evidence in question, but you've to first address the evidence in the other topic.

[gurey25]

I've already brought up evidence of takfiring Alawis/Shias and you run away from the other topic. In the same topic, there was evidence of flipflopping. I've already completed the search and got the evidence in question, but you've to first address the evidence in the other topic.

you really dont make sense?
when you make accusation be clear, and dont go through entirely different subjects, dont mix them.

1. do i consider allawis to non-muslim? ofcourse didnt you see me post on this thread, and on several other thread?
2.do i make takfir on shia? never, categoric denial. never happened and all my posts are available to be judged.

i advise you to be clear in your accusations.

[InoCabdi]

yes he is a deviant.
I have known him very closely and he has done some deviant things while knowing they are bida'h.
if you want me to explain i will

[misterioso]

Whats with you and your obsession with "5 examples">

1. He speaks the truth about Israel and their evil intentions without fear.
A. There are 1000s of scholars (including Somalis) who openly spoke about it, without fear.
2. He speaks the truth about the Judeo-Christian alliance and their intentions towards the Muslim world.
A. Refer to answer 1.
3. He speaks the truth about the nature of Muslim brotherhood and their misguided nature.
A. There're 1000s Sufis, Shias, Alawis, Ahlu-Sunnah, etc who spoke like him and "called a spade a spade" about the MB.
4. He speaks the truth about the situation in Syria and call it what it is (about the CIA salafi scums).
A. Refer to answer 3.
5. He speaks the truth about the current state of the confused Ummah and warns about sectarian wars between Muslims and to support Iran in the face of western aggression in regards to their nuclear programme.
A. There are at least 1000 scholars, some non-Sunnis, who spoke about the issue. Nothing unique about him.

1. do i consider allawis to non-muslim? ofcourse didnt you see me post on this thread, and on several other thread?

After someone scolded you for takfiring Alawis, you changed your views about them, and proclaimed they aren't kuffar. Clear and outright flipflopping.

yes he is a deviant.
I have known him very closely and he has done some deviant things while knowing they are bida'h.
if you want me to explain i will

Please explain.