I'll tell you whats funny , Taking an honest heartfelt advise as some sort of self boasting brag , you cant see clearlyMuslimstruggler wrote:Whats so funny saxib, would you care to elaborate?
your Qabilism is clouding your optic nerve .



Moderator: Moderators
I'll tell you whats funny , Taking an honest heartfelt advise as some sort of self boasting brag , you cant see clearlyMuslimstruggler wrote:Whats so funny saxib, would you care to elaborate?
Yes, because if you know Somalia's history you would know that somalia's problems began or was severely exacerbated by the ogaden war. The war run the state treachery clean, things didnt go according to plan, somalia lost the war, spent all lot of resources, its army was weakened. As a result, siad barre who had turned to the US for help after being abandoned by the USSR, used the aid money that was given to him to instigate clan conflicts among the various rival clans. By doing this he believed that he would be able to stay in power for longer. His army wasnt as strong as before so he relied on the tactics of divide and rule. This later on backfired and civil war broke out as rival clans scrambled to take control of what little the country had.Meyle wrote:Do you really believe the war in the south took place because of resources?
In that case I apologize my dear sister or brother.hargaysaay wrote:I'll tell you whats funny , Taking an honest heartfelt advise as some sort of self boasting brag , you cant see clearlyMuslimstruggler wrote:Whats so funny saxib, would you care to elaborate?
your Qabilism is clouding your optic nerve .![]()
![]()
Errr...no. Nice try though.saacJabshee wrote:I dont buy this "oh we are a model" for other Somali, whether it comes from a Darood or Isaaq. The only reason why Bari or Waqooyi haven't fought as long and brutal as the people in Koonfur is simply financial. Remember Mogadisho is the capital of Somaliyo including the break away region. This means the UN and the and other donor states will have to deal with whoever is in charge of Mogadisho. The militia's are more opportunist than qabilist id say. My reason is, people fighting in mogadisho after the kacaan fell were just militia firms turning on each other in order to control large parts of mogadisho or all off it. Whenever there was a fight the people who lived in those areas would flee and the UN would ring the "humanitarian" alarm. However they wouldn't be able to get to the areas where the fighting was taking place due to their security not being guaranteed. Who would then guarantee their safety? whichever mooryan group won. They would talk to the mooryaans and pay them off. These tactics were used in other areas of Somalia.
Another reason why Mogadisho has been more violent is because there was a mad rush for the villa Somalia seat. Although there were some honest men who tried, most of them the competitors were mooryan or funded by mooryaan. When their was a political stalemate between oppositions, they would have death matches on streets and whoever won took it all home that. Reer bari and waqooyi had to kick stones whilst all this was happening since no one was paying them attention. If they fought, the price wouldn't be of any financial worth. After a while they started talking about "hormar" iyo "diib u diis"then their meager developments got to their head and now you have people saying "oh somali should copy us". I dont think Hawiye are less peaceful then Darood or Isaaq.