Page 2 of 2
Re: 1935 German writing about Amhara views on Amir Nur; he is Darod/Marehan
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2019 6:51 pm
by grandpakhalif
This guy is chasing the goose in every single thread, its as if he has an alarmbell that rings everytime Marehan is mentioned here, talk about a loser!
Re: 1935 German writing about Amhara views on Amir Nur; he is Darod/Marehan
Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 11:53 am
by DalJecel60
Alot of people deny it but Ahmed Gurey was also Marehan
Re: 1935 German writing about Amhara views on Amir Nur; he is Darod/Marehan
Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 10:20 pm
by original dervish
I thought he was Kranle.
Re: 1935 German writing about Amhara views on Amir Nur; he is Darod/Marehan
Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2019 5:19 pm
by UgaaskaBarakaysan
From most of the documents I've analyzed as well as the ones you've shared. Goyta is always translated as "Lord", so in the context of referring to an individual it is in deference to their rank in the land.
A passage in this peer reviewed document examining Harari history this is a translation that includes the phrase Goyta in a different frame of reference.
"Alla goyta mahārīwey" which means "God is a forgiving Lord"
https://www.academia.edu/5529158/2010_T ... e_of_Harar
Re: 1935 German writing about Amhara views on Amir Nur; he is Darod/Marehan
Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2019 9:59 pm
by dalalos101
Among Hawiye, Karanle are the only ones mentioned by name in Futuh Al Habesha, but that is as far as it goes. Karanle are Murusade of today.
Re: 1935 German writing about Amhara views on Amir Nur; he is Darod/Marehan
Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2019 3:16 pm
by Voltage
dalalos101 wrote: Fri Sep 27, 2019 9:59 pm
Among Hawiye, Karanle are the only ones mentioned by name in Futuh Al Habesha, but that is as far as it goes. Karanle are Murusade of today.
You should understand when someone is a troll and does not deserve a response.
Re: 1935 German writing about Amhara views on Amir Nur; he is Darod/Marehan
Posted: Wed Oct 23, 2019 10:49 am
by Lalune
Wow great information!