I just ended this niggas lifeHutuKing01 wrote:This thread will be real good.
Getting some popcorn.
Fight fight fight, jerry jerry


Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators
I just ended this niggas lifeHutuKing01 wrote:This thread will be real good.
Getting some popcorn.
Fight fight fight, jerry jerry
I am not asking for his banning, but he should stop flooding an active section. I remember how he use to flood the generals and you guys made him stop doing that. Now he moved to the politics sectionFAH1223 wrote:Emperior keeps messaging me wanting Coeus banned
actually coeus is a hutu trying masquerade as an idoormetamorphosis wrote:Hawiye will always bee peasants for isaaq. I cant believe you would side with the man who think hutus are nothing short of slaves.HutuKing01 wrote:Wariye Coeus is doing shaqo culus. Halkaas ka sii wad
It seems you can even comprehend basic forums rulesabdalla11 wrote:I am not asking for his banning, but he should stop flooding an active section. I remember how he use to flood the generals and you guys made him stop doing that. Now he moved to the politics sectionFAH1223 wrote:Emperior keeps messaging me wanting Coeus banned
exactly! so you should be posting in the Politics - Somali Government section or Politics - National Matters or even the General - Current Events section, not flooding the Politics - General Discussions section with your empty topics that produce zero discussions.Coeus wrote:It seems you can even comprehend basic forums rulesabdalla11 wrote:I am not asking for his banning, but he should stop flooding an active section. I remember how he use to flood the generals and you guys made him stop doing that. Now he moved to the politics sectionFAH1223 wrote:Emperior keeps messaging me wanting Coeus banned![]()
This nigga is confused, probably because the Dutch just banned Khat and he is feeling the effects![]()
All topics are REQUIRED to be withing its own section.
Political topics= Political section. Nigga put that in your dry raisin head
Somali Politics - Siyaasada SoomaalidaCoeus wrote:It seems you can even comprehend basic forums rulesabdalla11 wrote:I am not asking for his banning, but he should stop flooding an active section. I remember how he use to flood the generals and you guys made him stop doing that. Now he moved to the politics sectionFAH1223 wrote:Emperior keeps messaging me wanting Coeus banned![]()
This nigga is confused, probably because the Dutch just banned Khat and he is feeling the effects![]()
All topics are REQUIRED to be withing its own section.
Political topics= Political section. Nigga put that in your dry raisin head
OMG she is back......exactly! so you should be posting in the Politics - Somali Government section or Politics - National Matters or even the General - Current Events section, not flooding the Politics - General Discussions section with your empty topics that produce zero discussions.
So depending on how many people respond to the article, then the topic can be removed from that section?Somali Politics - Siyaasada Soomaalida
| Politics - General Discussions |
^Your topics are clearly not discussions. Look how many topics you created just today with 0 replies?
Coeus wrote:OMG she is back......exactly! so you should be posting in the Politics - Somali Government section or Politics - National Matters or even the General - Current Events section, not flooding the Politics - General Discussions section with your empty topics that produce zero discussions.
yes you dumbfuck. it's called a discussion for a reason.. if your topic is an article and nothing else, it should be dumped into another section. if your topic is asking a question ( i.e. "Will the London conference change Somalia? Al jazeera") thus generating a discussion then it belongs in the discussion section. why is this concept so hard for you to grasp?Coeus wrote:So depending on how many people respond to the article, then the topic can be removed from that section?Somali Politics - Siyaasada Soomaalida
| Politics - General Discussions |
^Your topics are clearly not discussions. Look how many topics you created just today with 0 replies?![]()
So according to your logic my "will the london conference change somalia al jazeera" topic is the only one topic that is supposed to be in that section?
Do you even think before you write down bullshit?![]()
![]()
No. I am saying you're flooding the forumCoeus wrote:So depending on how many people respond to the article, then the topic can be removed from that section?Somali Politics - Siyaasada Soomaalida
| Politics - General Discussions |
^Your topics are clearly not discussions. Look how many topics you created just today with 0 replies?![]()
So according to your logic my "will the london conference change somalia al jazeera" topic is the only one topic that is supposed to be in that section?
Do you even think before you write down bullshit?![]()
![]()
Are you Abdalla 11 horta?gemini07 wrote:yes you dumbfuck. it's called a discussion for a reason.. if your topic is an article and nothing else, it should be dumped into another section. if your topic is asking a question ( i.e. "Will the London conference change Somalia? Al jazeera") thus generating a discussion then it belongs in the discussion section. why is this concept so hard for you to grasp?Coeus wrote:So depending on how many people respond to the article, then the topic can be removed from that section?Somali Politics - Siyaasada Soomaalida
| Politics - General Discussions |
^Your topics are clearly not discussions. Look how many topics you created just today with 0 replies?![]()
So according to your logic my "will the london conference change somalia al jazeera" topic is the only one topic that is supposed to be in that section?
Do you even think before you write down bullshit?![]()
![]()
i see you still don't understand what a discussion is. it means i can reply to you even if you didn't address me.Coeus wrote:Are you Abdalla 11 horta?gemini07 wrote:yes you dumbfuck. it's called a discussion for a reason.. if your topic is an article and nothing else, it should be dumped into another section. if your topic is asking a question ( i.e. "Will the London conference change Somalia? Al jazeera") thus generating a discussion then it belongs in the discussion section. why is this concept so hard for you to grasp?Coeus wrote:
So depending on how many people respond to the article, then the topic can be removed from that section?![]()
So according to your logic my "will the london conference change somalia al jazeera" topic is the only one topic that is supposed to be in that section?
Do you even think before you write down bullshit?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
metamorphosis wrote:abdalla11 wrote:
This is madness wallahi
gemini07 wrote: