BREAKING NEWS: Benazir Bhutto Killed!!!

[Leila2007]

Hariri's case was surely calculated and when Israel was boming lebanon no one said anything for weeks.

Having said that Musharaf is the one losing out on her death as he was going to share power and create a gov with Bhutto.


It's got something to do with the military as she was anti military and their power in Pakistan.

Whatever the case though we need to quit killing each other. How many more will be killed senselesly and for no reaason.

If they dont want a woman to rule/ in power simply dont vote! No reason to kill!

[Kramer]

[quote="nafisa.bush"]how is she naked? look at this idiot moron claiming a muslim woman naked on her death.[/quote]

http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i94/U ... Bhutto.jpg

http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/1 ... 68x592.jpg

She was taught politics and government by America and UK and then install in Muslim country !

From 1969 to 1973 she attended Radcliffe College, and then Harvard University, where she obtained a Bachelor of Arts degree cum laude in comparative government. The next phase of her education took place in the United Kingdom. Between 1973 and 1977 Bhutto studied Philosophy, Politics, and Economics at Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford. She completed a course in International Law and Diplomacy while at Oxford.

[Alluring]

[quote="FAH1223"][quote="Alluring"]Unclebin,

You want to get me to say something, that you yourself are not fully aware of. The man REVISED Islam for his own purpose, and if people are saying "because people didn't pratice it in a correct form" is irrelevant. You can not change something that is not yours to.[/quote]

he didn't change Islam, he brought back the unity of God back in the sphere

what you are referring to is some of the laws of modern day Saudia

http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the ... -bogeyman/[/quote]

Did I say he changed Islam, or did he REVISE it? Revision is not CHANGE, it is tampering here and there. Which in reality is wrong.

[Unclebin-]

One thing I will tell you... She knew that multiple groups where gunning for her and she still returned... Something tells me that power is thing that many will die for.... As can be seen by Abdullahi yusuf who will not go down until he's killed.

[Aerosmith]

The_Patriot mate just cause some call other dead muslims dictators does not justify you saying anything against a dead muslima. Do not celebrate someone's Death if you have any Insaniyat left in u.

Secondly who told you she's a shia and even if she were they still are muslims. Abhoski bhat he yaar!!

Pakistan Zindabad


Vital Signs - Dil Dil Pakistan

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAiVZq_u7mI

[Alluring]

[quote="Unclebin-"]One thing I will tell you... She knew that multiple groups where gunning for her and she still returned... Something tells me that power is thing that many will die for.... As can be seen by Abdullahi yusuf who will not go down until he's killed.[/quote]

You are a complete and utter moron.

[Unclebin-]

[quote="Alluring"][quote="FAH1223"][quote="Alluring"]Unclebin,

You want to get me to say something, that you yourself are not fully aware of. The man REVISED Islam for his own purpose, and if people are saying "because people didn't pratice it in a correct form" is irrelevant. You can not change something that is not yours to.[/quote]

he didn't change Islam, he brought back the unity of God back in the sphere

what you are referring to is some of the laws of modern day Saudia

http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the ... -bogeyman/[/quote]

Did I say he changed Islam, or did he REVISE it? Revision is not CHANGE, it is tampering here and there. Which in reality is wrong.[/quote]


What did he revise? Give us an example please?

[Kramer]

[quote="fisabililah"]This is the women that used to say the shariah was babaric, and she used to promote her kufr.she is not a loss to the muslims.

May Allah (subhanu wa ta'alaa) give her what she deserves.[/quote]

The Taliban took power in Kabul in September 1996. It was during Bhutto's rule that the Taliban gained prominence in Afghanistan. She viewed the Taliban as a group that could stabilize Afghanistan and enable trade access to the Central Asian republics, according to author Stephen Coll.[13] He claims that her government provided military and financial support for the Taliban, even sending a small unit of the Pakistani army into Afghanistan.

[Unclebin-]

[quote="Alluring"][quote="Unclebin-"]One thing I will tell you... She knew that multiple groups where gunning for her and she still returned... Something tells me that power is thing that many will die for.... As can be seen by Abdullahi yusuf who will not go down until he's killed.[/quote]

You are a complete and utter moron.[/quote]

Simple one liners are a sign of defeat.... I've asked you countless times in this thread.... have you read Sheik Ibn abdulwahabs book? What did he revise? what did he change and all you can think about is me talking about this ladies stupidity for coming back knowing she was going to be killed...


Now if you can't find one mistake of "WAHABBISM" AS YOU TERM IT.... Then kindly ask allah to forgive you for insulting the sheik.

[FAH1223]

[quote="Alluring"][quote="FAH1223"][quote="Alluring"]Unclebin,

You want to get me to say something, that you yourself are not fully aware of. The man REVISED Islam for his own purpose, and if people are saying "because people didn't pratice it in a correct form" is irrelevant. You can not change something that is not yours to.[/quote]

he didn't change Islam, he brought back the unity of God back in the sphere

what you are referring to is some of the laws of modern day Saudia

http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the ... -bogeyman/[/quote]

Did I say he changed Islam, or did he REVISE it? Revision is not CHANGE, it is tampering here and there. Which in reality is wrong.[/quote]

he didn't revise though

the saudis in the modern times have, with not letting women drive and what not, but atleast the strictness of Tawhid, the oneness of Allah is stressed so much

he got people to not commit shirk and pray to statues

he isn't to blame for anything, if anything he helped Muslims to return to core concepts

but in the last 200 years, areas have still deviated some

[Unclebin-]

[quote="FAH1223"][quote="Alluring"][quote="FAH1223"][quote="Alluring"]Unclebin,

You want to get me to say something, that you yourself are not fully aware of. The man REVISED Islam for his own purpose, and if people are saying "because people didn't pratice it in a correct form" is irrelevant. You can not change something that is not yours to.[/quote]

he didn't change Islam, he brought back the unity of God back in the sphere

what you are referring to is some of the laws of modern day Saudia

http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the ... -bogeyman/[/quote]

Did I say he changed Islam, or did he REVISE it? Revision is not CHANGE, it is tampering here and there. Which in reality is wrong.[/quote]

he didn't revise though

the saudis in the modern times have, with not letting women drive and what not, but atleast the strictness of Tawhid, the oneness of Allah is stressed so much

he got people to not commit shirk and pray to statues

he isn't to blame for anything, if anything he helped Muslims to return to core concepts

but in the last 200 years, areas have still deviated some[/quote]


That is saudi deviation not a man who lived 200 plus years ago.... There were no cars then LOOOL

[FAH1223]

[quote="Unclebin-"][quote="FAH1223"][quote="Alluring"][quote="FAH1223"][quote="Alluring"]Unclebin,

You want to get me to say something, that you yourself are not fully aware of. The man REVISED Islam for his own purpose, and if people are saying "because people didn't pratice it in a correct form" is irrelevant. You can not change something that is not yours to.[/quote]

he didn't change Islam, he brought back the unity of God back in the sphere

what you are referring to is some of the laws of modern day Saudia

http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the ... -bogeyman/[/quote]

Did I say he changed Islam, or did he REVISE it? Revision is not CHANGE, it is tampering here and there. Which in reality is wrong.[/quote]

he didn't revise though

the saudis in the modern times have, with not letting women drive and what not, but atleast the strictness of Tawhid, the oneness of Allah is stressed so much

he got people to not commit shirk and pray to statues

he isn't to blame for anything, if anything he helped Muslims to return to core concepts

but in the last 200 years, areas have still deviated some[/quote]


That is saudi deviation not a man who lived 200 plus years ago.... There were no cars then LOOOL[/quote]

thats what I'm saying looool

the saudis have deviated in the modern times with modern...stuff i guess lol

[Unclebin-]

LOOOOL

yeah man people have called Sheik's like Ibn Taymiyyah and Sheiks of contemporary like Albani unqualified and countless names....

A sheik who is hated on must be a good sheik because nobody can bring forth proof.

[Mr. Yungnfresh]

see thats the problem...there's nothing wrong with the Salaf's or Sheikh Muhammad ibn AbdulWahhab, the problem is people who do weird shid in the name of a group or scholar and then consequently, outsiders equate the weird shid with that particular group/scholar (Salafis/Wahabis)

basically, the weird shid is the problem!!!

[Alluring]

UB,

Your lack of common sagacity shows depth, perhaps speaking in one liner(s) would help someone of your intellect. Furthermore, your ideologies are farfetched and contradictory.