That is not how you usually state it. You often use the trickery by saying just ''closer''. This leads genetics noobs to think something else altogether.zumaale wrote:Itrah, stop sounding like a broken record. Let us finish this and once and for all.
I argue that, we do not have a close male ancestor and that your male blood line is closer to a Beja than me. Is that false? Forget about autosomnal data, like I have said, that does not concern me as my interest in genetics is limited to paternal ancestry.
They quoted older studies (Sanchez again) they did no analysis on Y-lineages themselves. The study was focused on autosomal ancestry and all their analysis was done on that.zumaale wrote:Secondly, I was not referring to that 2004 study solely, the following study was published in June 2014 and it also hypothesises we did not expand into the Horn simultaneously.
http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/a ... en.1004393
Please, do not insult my intelligence as I am not denying we genetically match very closely but there is no way in hell you can argue against the fact that we are not of the same male blood line
Essentially it still relying on that 2004 stuff.