The winner of The New Hamitic Continent's Naming Contest

Daily chitchat.

Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators

Forum rules
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
User avatar
jalaaludin5
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 8832
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 7:37 am
Location: “Beauties in vain their pretty eyes may roll; Charms strike the sight, but merit wins the soul.”

Re: The winner of The New Hamitic Continent's Naming Contest

Post by jalaaludin5 »

Bilis wrote:
jalaaludin5 wrote:The "humiliation of his cousins by bantus" is your humiliation (as a Somali) .
I'm not even from konfurta, so I'm not sure what this guy's on about. :lol:

I agree with the Somalinimo thing, though, btw.
jalaaludin5 wrote:Nothing has change sxb. Qabyaalad using falsified historical events and gabayo rag leeyihin been associated with anyone but the rightful owner....to using habar Haplogroup language to perpetuate same old lies.

Am not pointing a finger but just trying to draw your attention to why I was apprehensive about the obsession with DNA testing because i knew it will just be the modern way of qabyaalad. (Sophisticated modern qabiilist well versed in the science of habar-haplo).
Please be more specific sxb. What are these "falsified historical events" you allude to? Cause the Futuh is actually written medieval history.

.
viewtopic.php?f=245&t=314032

:comeon:

:lol:
-
-
-
User avatar
RoobleAlWaliid
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2708
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:31 pm

Re: The winner of The New Hamitic Continent's Naming Contest

Post by RoobleAlWaliid »

jalaaludin5 wrote:
The "humiliation of his cousins by bantus" is your humiliation (as a Somali) .
Jalaaludin5 do your tell your kin all over this forum the same, when they throw those Bantu insults around. Are you a man of equality? You know we have égalité written on the Djibouti coin.

As for your remark. It's not my humiliation.

It is "they" who have dragged the Somali name through the dirt and it is they who currently are d*ckriding foreigners the hardest even on ancestry after they sh*tted all over the Somali name.

Dude my kin might feel their humiliation, cause Somalinimo is deep-rooted in them, but I'm desensitized and wouldn't give a rats ass.
User avatar
Bilis
SomaliNetizen
SomaliNetizen
Posts: 418
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 11:56 am

Re: The winner of The New Hamitic Continent's Naming Contest

Post by Bilis »

Jabuutawi wrote:Billis, you seem to be well versed in this subject but downplaying Dir's presence in the region makes me wonder about your sincerity and motive. I am no history buff nor a geneticist but the snippets I read about, and of, Futuh does not mention Herti or Ogadayn. Care to share with us a screenshot of the actual page it mentions these two groups? In fact, the only Darod clan it mentions that I am aware of is Merehan, and the impact they had with respect to the war was minimal.
I'm not downplaying the Dir presence in the Adal area sxb. Why would I? I actually acknowledged it from the start.

The Futuh al-Habash mentions some vanished Somali clans native to the Ogaden region. It also explicitly notes that the Harti were at the time centered in Mait in Sanaag and were a key part of Adal's infantry:
"On the left was the Somali tribe of Harti, from the people of Mait; a people not given to yielding. There were three-hundred of them, famous among the infantry as stolid swordsmen."
Jabuutawi wrote:Your belief that Haplogroup E1b1b-V32 had significant presence in the region does not lend itself to reconcile with science, history or anthropology. The population of the north then, as now, was and still is predominantly Dir. Henceforth, one can make statistical supposition of Haplogroup T presence and dominance in the northern region then as now.

Culturally and linguistically we are monolithic though our genes have two separate Y-DNA sources. That said, look at the Brits, a potpourri of nations (and genes) Anglos, Saxons, Celts, Romans, Viking, etc. but all call that island home. I don't see any different if "T" and "E1b1b" call the Somali peninsula home.
The population of the northwest is today predominantly Dir, though not necessarily in the past.

Remember, all major Somali clans spread from a northern locus in the Sanaag region. This is why most of the clan patriarchs are buried in or near this area. There are also historical documents that make this clear (see above with the Harti in the Futuh).

That said, the fact that around 50% of Ogaden today apparently carry haplogroup T suggests that the clade's modern distribution pattern is perhaps more complicated than we had realized. There's actually a theory (I mentioned it a while ago) that suggests that haplogroup T was more widespread throughout Northeast Africa, but was later overrun by E1b1b. What do you make of this given the Trombetta frequencies?
User avatar
jalaaludin5
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 8832
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 7:37 am
Location: “Beauties in vain their pretty eyes may roll; Charms strike the sight, but merit wins the soul.”

Re: The winner of The New Hamitic Continent's Naming Contest

Post by jalaaludin5 »

RoobleAlWaliid wrote:
jalaaludin5 wrote:
The "humiliation of his cousins by bantus" is your humiliation (as a Somali) .
Jalaaludin5 do your tell your kin all over this forum the same, when they throw those Bantu insults around. Are you a man of equality? You know we have égalité written on the Djibouti coin.

As for your remark. It's not my humiliation.

It is "they" who have dragged the Somali name through the dirt and it is they who currently are d*ckriding foreigners the hardest even on ancestry after they sh*tted all over the Somali name.

Dude my kin might feel their humiliation, cause Somalinimo is deep-rooted in them, but I'm desensitized and wouldn't give a rats ass.
Actually when it comes to 'telling your kin the truth' I don't think there is another member in this site who has been very critical of his kin as IandI (moi).

But I hear you about been desensitized.
-
-
-
User avatar
Bilis
SomaliNetizen
SomaliNetizen
Posts: 418
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 11:56 am

Re: The winner of The New Hamitic Continent's Naming Contest

Post by Bilis »

RoobleAlWaliid wrote:It is "they" who have dragged the Somali name through the dirt and it is they who currently are d*ckriding foreigners the hardest even on ancestry after they sh*tted all over the Somali name.
Aha! So that's what's really bugging you. :lol:

I'm sorry if you can't stomach the fact that ethnic Somalis have close ties with other Afro-Asiatic populations in Northeast Africa. However, throwing a hissy fit like a two year-old toddler won't make those blood relations go away.
RoobleAlWaliid wrote:Petty qabiil talk you say :damn: , you see I keep it transparent, while you sugarcoat your clannish side with DNA etc.
Stop projecting. It's you that tried to inject petty qabilism into this discussion and started dissing clans. However, I didn't reciprocate because it's indeed childish.
RoobleAlWaliid wrote:Did you quote the book or ""Somalia: nation in search of a state""

I have not read that book, but who's to say it's the only source of information on that event.

The book will arrive at my doorsteps pretty soon.
Good for you. :up:

By the way, that is not the main (let alone the only) source of information on the medieval conquest of Abyssinia. The Futuh al-Habasha by Shihab ad-Din itself is, obviously.

This is the problem with waxing authoritative about something you clearly don't know the first thing about. :geek:
User avatar
Bilis
SomaliNetizen
SomaliNetizen
Posts: 418
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 11:56 am

Re: The winner of The New Hamitic Continent's Naming Contest

Post by Bilis »

jalaaludin5 wrote: viewtopic.php?f=245&t=314032

:comeon:

:lol:
I'm not sure what that is about. :?

In any event, you should know that all that I've indicated is actually in the Futuh Al-Habasha itself. The treatise was written during the Middle Ages by Shihab ad-Din, a Yemeni. He was Ahmed Gurey's personal assistant. It chronicles the conquest first-hand, as it actually happened.
User avatar
RoobleAlWaliid
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2708
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:31 pm

Re: The winner of The New Hamitic Continent's Naming Contest

Post by RoobleAlWaliid »

Bilis wrote: Aha! So that's what's really bugging you. :lol:
Merely stating facts, it's not bugging me in any way. It should be bugging you, but it's not cause you are daba-dhilif by nature.
Bilis wrote: Stop projecting. It's you that tried to inject petty qabilism into this discussion and started dissing clans. However, I didn't reciprocate because it's indeed childish.
Bilis is one of your numerous accounts. You actually do engage in it with your others. Anyone with a healthy mind can see through your hypocrisy. You reek of it.
Bilis wrote:
RoobleAlWaliid wrote:Did you quote the book or ""Somalia: nation in search of a state""

I have not read that book, but who's to say it's the only source of information on that event.

The book will arrive at my doorsteps pretty soon.
Good for you. :up:

By the way, that is not the main (let alone the only) source of information on the medieval conquest of Abyssinia. The Futuh al-Habasha by Shihab ad-Din itself is, obviously.
Bilis, there you go away with your silly reading comprehension. Do you even know what you type down.

You implied that I obviously haven't read the Futuh, in which I replied.
I have not read that book, but who's to say it's the only source of information on that event.
With (the/that book) I obviously meant the Futuh(obviously), not the low quality ""Somalia: nation in search of a state"" book you quoted.

Everyone knows that the Futuh is a great source on the occurrences, but it's not the only source.

Have you visited Ethiopia. Have your read documents written by Abyssinian's around those time or any other group.
To say that the Futuh is the only source, is a silly one grasshopper.

Now please move along. I don't have time to argue with fella that possesses the reading comprehension of a child.
User avatar
RoobleAlWaliid
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2708
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:31 pm

Re: The winner of The New Hamitic Continent's Naming Contest

Post by RoobleAlWaliid »

Iblis don't speak on Afro-Asiatics either. This wanker loves whitewashing Somalis. I and many have seen it on many occasions. You possess the self-worth of a cockroach. He's like the opposite of Malibantu and that means you are a danger to the Somali state.



Sir have a good day.
Itrah
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 3174
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 2:26 pm

Re: The winner of The New Hamitic Continent's Naming Contest

Post by Itrah »

RoobleAlWaliid wrote:Iblis don't speak on Afro-Asiatics either. This wanker loves whitewashing Somalis. I and many have seen it on many occasions. You possess the self-worth of a cockroach. He's like the opposite of Malibantu and that means you are a danger to the Somali state.

Sir have a good day.
While he does at times exaggerate the similarity Cushites have with ''Caucasians'', overall he is not a bad guy. He seems like a well-read person and actually provides academic sources to many of his arguments. You can't say that about clowns like MaliPrince or Yalaxoow.

But I agree, IMO he should tone down on the ''Somalis = Caucasians'' sophistry. It is far more nuanced than that.
User avatar
Bilis
SomaliNetizen
SomaliNetizen
Posts: 418
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 11:56 am

Re: The winner of The New Hamitic Continent's Naming Contest

Post by Bilis »

RoobleAlWaliid wrote: Merely stating facts, it's not bugging me in any way. It should be bugging you, but it's not cause you are daba-dhilif by nature.
Why would I be "bugged" by facts that I myself have stated? You make zero sense.

I, for one, am 100% comfortable with the fact that ethnic Somalis have close ties with other Afro-Asiatic populations in Northeast Africa. :up:
Bilis wrote: Bilis is one of your numerous accounts. You actually do engage in it with your others. Anyone with a healthy mind can see through your hypocrisy. You reek of it.
Man, you've really lost the plot now. :lol:

First you try insulting qabils, then you call me daba-dhilif with no justification. And since of course neither ad hominem strategy works, you now accuse me of multinicking.

Since you're apparently so smart, what's my other account(s) here, pray tell? You'd better get it right too because false accusations are against the website's terms and conditions. :geek:
RoobleAlWaliid wrote: Bilis, there you go away with your silly reading comprehension. Do you even know what you type down.

You implied that I obviously haven't read the Futuh, in which I replied.

[...]

With (the/that book) I obviously meant the Futuh(obviously), not the low quality ""Somalia: nation in search of a state"" book you quoted.

Everyone knows that the Futuh is a great source on the occurrences, but it's not the only source.

Have you visited Ethiopia. Have your read documents written by Abyssinian's around those time or any other group.
To say that the Futuh is the only source, is a silly one grasshopper.

Now please move along. I don't have time to argue with fella that possesses the reading comprehension of a child.
Ok, so I misunderstood your assertion to the effect that "who's to say it's the only source of information on that event." Way to go with the pedantry. :up:

I also never wrote that the Futuh al-Habasha was the only historical source. I'm well aware that there are some later (not contemporaneous) Abyssinian "documents" on the conquest. It is strange that you should allude to them, though, since they are essentially self-serving. Just as an example, these works alternately claim that Ahmed Gurey was either a Yemeni or Beja or half Abyssinian. In other words, anything but Somali (let alone Dir) in order to save face.

Oh, the irony. :roll:
zumaale
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 3458
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 5:45 pm

Re: The winner of The New Hamitic Continent's Naming Contest

Post by zumaale »

Bilis wrote:
RoobleAlWaliid wrote: They already tried in the previous regime and I see they are still trying too.

Well said, tell them camarade!
Who is "they"? :lol: You do realize that most of Adal's forces during the Futuh were from Darod clans, right?
"It may be said in passing, however, that although Somali clans — principally the Habar Magadle Isaaq, the Harti Daarood, and the Mareehaan — played a strong role in Gran's conquest of Abyssinia, these clans went to war not so much as Somalis but as Muslims."
Are you by any chance Habar Magadle? No? Then by your own logic, you are "stealing" their history. :P

Say no to passive-aggressive nonsense. :up:
Bilis have you even read Futhul Habash?

The passage you just quoted as evidence is from Laitin and Samatar's book via Wikipedia and is not the complete list of clans that took part in the Futhul Habash wars.

Furthermore, in Futhul Habash, the Harti are mentioned as being from Mait in North Eastern Somalia. Clans from a wide geographic area were drawn to the war against the Abyssinians and not necessarily from the Northwestern region.

Countless of clans are mentioned in Futhul Habash such as the Gurgura (Dir) and as a matter of fact the Gurgura provided more troops than the Mareexan or Harti for instance.

E1b1b Somalis were not systematically killed off in Northern Somalia during the Adal Wars as you have argued because the Habashis did not proceed in earnest to Northern Somalia after the death of Axmed Gurey as both they and the remnants of Axmed Gurey's troops were occupied with the Oromo expansion that overwhelmed them. They were occupied with consolidating the lands they reconquered. The battle lines continued to be drawn in the highlands.

It is an established fact among Somalis that Northern Somalia has always been a homeland for Dir clans and the fact that T haplogroup is found among them at high percentages is possibly a reflection of their common paternal ancestry. Take me for example, my clan ancestor is buried in Northern Somalia and his descendants gradually moved South. Now can it be a coincidence that Surres from Southern Somalia who have done a y-dna ancestry test belong to haplogroup T like the majority of their Northern clan kin who have taken the test?

Similarly, it is not a coincidence that Daroods that have been tested are predominately haplogroup E-V32. The six (Somalia) individuals tested by Trombetta are from Puntland and they all belong to E-V32. Even the 40 plus people that were tested in Jijiga by Plaster et al were overwhelmingly E1b1b1. Jijiga is a mainly Darood city with a Dir minority. Whereas, 80 percent or so of the 18 Somalis tested in Dire Dawa were haplogroup T. Moreover, 75 percent of the the Somalis tested in Djibouti ny Trombetta did not belong to E1b1b and could more than likely belong to haplogroup T. I am not saying we have conclusive proof yet as a subclan by subclan test of all Somalis should be conducted. Nonetheless, one cannot deny that there is a noticeable trend in the results coming out so far, be it on an individual basis or in an academic study.

As for the Somali Ethiopians sample used in Trombetta, Allah knows what clan they belonged to as Southern K5 is very diverse and if I am not mistaken they used a sample from Gode zone as the map indicates. The following article is useful in providing an idea of how mixed the zone is as it contains Ogaden, Karanle (Hawiye), Reer Bare (Bantu) and Bajamal (Dir).

http://www.africa.upenn.edu/eue_web/Godezone.htm
Gode zone is one of the areas in Region 5 inhabited by diverse groups of different clan origin. This social diversity is carried further by the presence of a distinct farming group, constituted of an association of Hawiya and Rer Bare, who live in mixed permanent agricultural settlements along the banks of the Webi Shabelle River in Kallafo district. This cultivating mixed group is known in literature as Rer Bare. The Rer Bare, who are associated with the Hawiya in Gode zone, physically resembles minority Bantu cultivating groups that occupy downstream Webi Shabelle and Juba rivers in southern Somalia.

Out of the six districts in Gode zone, two are largely occupied by Hawiya clans (the border districts of Ferfer Fer and Mustahil), two by Ogadeni clans (Gode and Dhanan), while the remaining two are socially mixed and therefore jointly controlled by the Dir and Ogadeni clans of Kallafo and Iimey (see Table 2 for the distribution of clans in the districts of the Gode zone).

Hawadle and Jidle Hawiya clans form the largest groups in the border districts of Fer Fer and Mustahil respectively. Tolomogge and Rer Ugas Nur form the largest Ogadeni clans in Gode and Dhanan districts respectively. Bah Geri clan of the Ogaden and associated Hawiya and Rer Bare form the dominant groups in Kallafo, while Iimey district is jointly controlled by the Duba of the Dir family and Rer Ammadin of the Ogaden. As Table 2 illustrates, the italicised clan represents the largest group of the district. Smaller groups living with the dominant group are not underlined.
Last edited by zumaale on Sat Aug 01, 2015 4:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
RoobleAlWaliid
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2708
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:31 pm

Re: The winner of The New Hamitic Continent's Naming Contest

Post by RoobleAlWaliid »

jalaaludin5 wrote:
Actually when it comes to 'telling your kin the truth' I don't think there is another member in this site who has been very critical of his kin as IandI (moi).
Actually you're right on that one, excuse-moi sxb.

Itrah wrote:While he does at times exaggerate the similarity Cushites have with ''Caucasians'', overall he is not a bad guy. He seems like a well-read person and actually provides academic sources to many of his arguments. You can't say that about clowns like MaliPrince or Yalaxoow.

But I agree, IMO he should tone down on the ''Somalis = Caucasians'' sophistry. It is far more nuanced than that.

True, he's not that bad and I enjoy his post enriching Somalis.

When it comes to clans though he tries to come off as a fair and unbiased lad, but he's far from that.
User avatar
samaalenoble
SomaliNetizen
SomaliNetizen
Posts: 286
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2015 3:43 pm

Re: The winner of The New Hamitic Continent's Naming Contest

Post by samaalenoble »

Bilis wrote:
samaalenoble wrote:What a f***tard. Let's finally get to the kadab angling and outright lying that you ever so want to run from.

[...]

You deviously took out "genocide" and inserted "war". I then told you a 14 year war event with 15th century firearms isn't a "population bottleneck". It is a population decline.
Easy there tough guy... don't go having an aneurysm on me now. :lol:

I'm well aware of what a population bottleneck is, thanks. And yes, it certainly does include wars like the Futuh al-Habash:
Genetically speaking, a population bottleneck is a phenomenon in which a notable proportion of a population dies leaving only a small part of the population left. The bottleneck occurs e.g. due to starvation, epidemic or war. Only the surviving individuals will pass their genes to the next generations, thereby reducing the amount of genetic variability. A narrow, long-lasting bottleneck has a major impact on gene pool, which might still be recognized (in the absence of immigration) even dozens of generations later.The Finnish disease heritage has for long been explained to be due population bottleneck(s).
Anger management ftw. :up:
samaalenoble wrote:You can't steal their history. You can't steal their history with archeology. And you most certainly can't steal it with science.
I'm not sure what you're on about. The Futuh al-Habash (the actual chronicle of the conquest of Abyssinia) enumerates all of the Somali clans that actually took part in the war. They include the Harti, Ogaden, Dir, Yibir, Madhiban and Garre, among others, as well as some now vanished Somali groups such as the Jairan and Mazra.
samaalenoble wrote:Haplogroup T wasn't the smaller population in the Adal Sultanate Wars, E1b1b was, but you obviously already knew that.
Why do you assume that haplogroup T bearers were more numerous during the Futuh? Simply because Dir played a part in the battles? If so, you should know that many other clans did as well. The actual chronicle of the conquest of Abyssinia makes this clear (see above). It is therefore certainly not a forgone conclusion that E1b1b carriers were less numerous then in the Adal Sultanate area.

Another thing, Trombetta et al. (2015) found that 50% of Somalis in Ethiopia (who, as you know, are mostly Ogaden) were E1b1b carriers. We can assume that the remaining 50% were mainly haplogroup T carriers. The notion that the T clade is or was mainly restricted to the Dir is thus not a given either.
samaalenoble wrote:Anyhow, Somalis need to realize that they must not use their intelligence and wit on each other but on their true enemies: Habeshas, Oromos, Bantus and so on and so forth.
Yes, we should focus on our true enemies. However, this has to be done on a case by case, individual basis.

By the way sxb, I don't consider you an "enemy". More like a perpetually irate little brother. :P In future, try not to take things so personally. You'll lead a more fun life that way. :up:


ROFL.

Just look at you. You got karbashed for your lying, and conniving behavior.

And what did you do?

You did it all over again like the Hubba Bubba bubble gum chewing, oversized sneaker wearing, hoodrat you are.

You're not convincing anyone.

Image
Itrah
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 3174
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 2:26 pm

Re: The winner of The New Hamitic Continent's Naming Contest

Post by Itrah »

Bilis wrote:Another thing, Trombetta et al. (2015) found that 50% of Somalis in Ethiopia (who, as you know, are mostly Ogaden) were E1b1b carriers. We can assume that the remaining 50% were mainly haplogroup T carriers. The notion that the T clade is or was mainly restricted to the Dir is thus not a given either.
No clan is 100% free of sheegad, but haplogroup T is quite rare in Darods and Hawiyes. Some may have T in those clans due to rape/cheating wives or whatnot, but the original lineage of those two clans is E-V32.

T is mainly found in the Dir and a big portion of the Isaaq (who I think are ex-Dir with a new identity).

At any rate, it is rather irrelevant when it comes to ethnic origins as all the above clans have the exact same autosomal DNA despite different lineages.
User avatar
Bilis
SomaliNetizen
SomaliNetizen
Posts: 418
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 11:56 am

Re: The winner of The New Hamitic Continent's Naming Contest

Post by Bilis »

Itrah wrote: While he does at times exaggerate the similarity Cushites have with ''Caucasians'', overall he is not a bad guy. He seems like a well-read person and actually provides academic sources to many of his arguments. You can't say that about clowns like MaliPrince or Yalaxoow.

But I agree, IMO he should tone down on the ''Somalis = Caucasians'' sophistry. It is far more nuanced than that.
This Rooble guy has been trailing me from thread to thread, posting lame passive-aggressive jabs. I figured early on that his malaise was specifically over the blood ties ethnic Somalis have with other Afro-Asiatic populations in Northeast Africa. Something also tells me this fellow knows a lot more about Ethiopia than he does Djibouti.

Anyway, just so it's clear, I never wrote that it's as simple as ''Somalis = Caucasians''. "Caucasoid" also isn't necessarily the same thing as "Caucasian" (the suffix "-oid" means "like" or "similar to"). I know that it's all more nuanced than that. Look out for some new ancient DNA finds tomorrow on my Land of Punt blog, and you'll perhaps begin to understand too.
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “General - General Discussions”