SomaliNet Forums

as well as Coeus and even KOW. I barely agree with some of their views but they idea they should be categorically targeted when the people who antagonize them and respond in kind are still here is a breach of equality. Different opinions and viewpoints add to a healthy perspective and so long as their excess should be effectively moderated, I see no reason to ban them while some others are allowed to post.

Multiple names perhaps?

I agree. Why should they been banned when there other people who are exactly like them and even WORSE. It takes TWO to tango, so how come those feuding with them aren't banned. Therefore Union, KOW and Coeus should be free. Next time ban all the people involved in the bickering. This will stop the strain and pressure given to our MODS.

Union, KOW and Coeus serve no purpose here other than to cause trouble. They should all get lifetime bans.

and who are the people who should be banned along with him?

Personally I don't care if they are banned or not. I don't like their constant preaching of secularism. Those who expose personal information and endanger the lives of forum members as a result should be permanently banned though.

yungnfresh wrote:Union, KOW and Coeus serve no purpose here other than to cause trouble. They should all get lifetime bans.

Who gives you the right to judge their purpose? If you simply dislike them, ignore list is that way use it wisely!

DropkickMurphy wrote:I don't like their constant preaching of secularism. Those who expose personal information and endanger the lives of forum members as a result should be permanently banned as well.

If you don't like their opnions and beliefs, use your ignore list or else stop moaning about them.

Gemini, well generally people who are always antagonizing them such as Seemeyer, Yung, etc. There are other people I think deserve to be banned for being distasteful such as Roving and you, but I am very much appreciative of Roving's intellectual contributions to the forum and you seem to be a somewhat changed and matured young woman.

People with multiple nicknames should be kicked out; We should tolerate different opinions.

We don't know why individuals are banned; so don't jump to conclusions

they were banned for a few weeks, they'll be back... but how long will be up to them

Voltage wrote:as well as Coeus and even KOW. I barely agree with some of their views but they idea they should be categorically targeted when the people who antagonize them and respond in kind are still here is a breach of equality. Different opinions and viewpoints add to a healthy perspective and so long as their excess should be effectively moderated, I see no reason to ban them while some others are allowed to post.

Why is Somalia still messed up then?

XimanJaale wrote:

yungnfresh wrote:Union, KOW and Coeus serve no purpose here other than to cause trouble. They should all get lifetime bans.

Who gives you the right to judge their purpose? If you simply dislike them, ignore list is that way use it wisely!

The "moderator" tag under my username give me that right...Union offends every Muslim on this board (the fact that it doesn't bother u at all speaks volumes), Coeus spends his time finding fake articles about assassinations that never happened to cause drama and KOW is forest trying to instigate clan bs. You're in that list with them too so I don't expect you to understand.

Voltage wrote:people who are always antagonizing them such as Seemeyer, Yung

How do I antagonize them? Give me one example if you're not talking out of your ass.

XimanJaale wrote:

DropkickMurphy wrote:I don't like their constant preaching of secularism. Those who expose personal information and endanger the lives of forum members as a result should be permanently banned as well.

If you don't like their opnions and beliefs, use your ignore list or else stop moaning about them.

I didn't call for their banning but I have no problem with them being banned. I do actually have some members on my ignore list. I make good use of that feature. But I do call for anyone who exposes personal information to be banned. That is against the law.

DropkickMurphy wrote:Personally I don't care if they are banned or not. I don't like their constant preaching of secularism. Those who expose personal information and endanger the lives of forum members as a result should be permanently banned though.

qansa,

the only way the mods can verify whether someones personal information has been exposed is if the member who claims their personal info was exposed scans government issued ID to the mods. but that'll never happen because you're all punks who are pissing their pants at the thought of people figuring out who you are so much so that you'd claim that people knowing your government name is somehow "endangering" your lives. men who engage in qabil battles and pretend to be warriors online crying to the mods because they're afraid that they will be held accountable for what they say on this forum is pretty entertaining. if you are not willing to stand by what you written on this forum, then don't say it to begin with.

did someone endanger your life? is that why you keep changing your username? the only people who should be banned are islam bashers and people who constantly change their username and pretend like you're a newbie ( multinickers like you).