Human Meat Found In McDonald’s Meat Factory
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 6:11 pm
SomaliNet Forums
Largest online Somali community!
http://www.somalinet.com/forums/
Human Meat Found In McDonald’s Meat Factory
Page 1 of 1
Re: Human Meat Found In McDonald’s Meat Factory
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 6:17 pm
its true.. beacon meat is basically human meat, cuz The pig has Human DNA and organs.. thats why its haram to begin with
Re: Human Meat Found In McDonald’s Meat Factory
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 6:27 pm
hey you bozo, it is actual real human meat, not pig meat. i know you work at McD, hence your defence of themCasanova25 wrote:its true.. beacon meat is basically human meat, cuz The pig has Human DNA and organs.. thats why its haram to begin with
http://dailybuzzlive.com/human-meat-fou ... t-factory/
Re: Human Meat Found In McDonald’s Meat Factory
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 6:32 pm
Re: Human Meat Found In McDonald’s Meat Factory
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 6:34 pm
Huh' I think they just got it wrong and saw Human DNA in the meat factory which they can't avoid since you have pigs in there..
Thats my thoughts, but what the hell do I know..
Thats my thoughts, but what the hell do I know..
Re: Human Meat Found In McDonald’s Meat Factory
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2014 8:49 am
Pig meat is NOT human meat, Menace:
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/ ... 887206.htm
All... "Mammals have most of the same genes for similar biochemical and physiological functions. If you look at the details of the genes … there'll be differences between them, but they'll still be doing the same kind of function," says Moran.
"It's a little bit like having a Ford or a Holden — it's still obviously a car but a slightly different version."
But while 20,000 similar genes sounds like a lot, only one to two per cent of our DNA actually encodes proteins. Most of the rest is transcribed into RNA.
Some RNAs that don't carry the plans for proteins have important structural or functional roles in their own right. Transfer RNAs, for example, ferry specific amino acids into a growing protein, while ribosomal RNA constitutes part of the factories in cells that manufacture proteins.
But we are only just beginning to understand what many other non-coding RNA molecules do. Some control higher level functions such as the expression of protein-encoding genes, and some have even been implicated in memory.
Evolutionary differences
Parts of the genome that don't encode proteins tend to evolve rapidly, so you can have significant regions of the genome where there's no discernible similarity between species, says Moran. This means many sequences will not line up when you compare genomes between species.
And the further away two species are on the evolutionary tree, the greater the difference.
"If we compare really closely related species, like a human and chimpanzee, we can still see the similarity between these rapidly changing sequences. If you move further away to the more distantly related pig, so many changes in the DNA will have occurred that it is no longer possible to recognise that the sequences were ever similar.
"Depending upon what it is that you are comparing you can say 'Yes, there's a very high degree of similarity, for example between a human and a pig protein coding sequence', but if you compare rapidly evolving non-coding sequences from a similar location in the genome, you may not be able to recognise any similarity at all. This means that blanket comparisons of all DNA sequences between species are not very meaningful."
One area where comparison of genome sequences isn't all that relevant, says Moran, is the emerging science of transplanting organs and tissues from pigs to humans.
"[The success of pig-human transplants] has very little to do with whether there's a two per cent or 20 per cent difference in the genome sequence — if those numbers actually meant anything anyway — the main barrier is caused by just one gene," says Moran.
That gene is called galactose-alpha-1,3,galactotransferase — gal-transferase for short . All mammals except humans and higher apes have a working version of gal-transferase, which coats cells with an antigen (a molecule that our immune system reacts to). This means if pig tissue is transplanted into humans our immune system will mount a drastic rejection response as our bodies detect the antigen and attack it.
Scientists have come up with a solution to stop tissue rejection: genetically modifying the pigs by eliminating the gal-transferase gene. A few more human genes are also added to the pigs to make the pig tissue even more acceptable to our immune system.
So some pigs and humans are now even more alike."
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/ ... 887206.htm
All... "Mammals have most of the same genes for similar biochemical and physiological functions. If you look at the details of the genes … there'll be differences between them, but they'll still be doing the same kind of function," says Moran.
"It's a little bit like having a Ford or a Holden — it's still obviously a car but a slightly different version."
But while 20,000 similar genes sounds like a lot, only one to two per cent of our DNA actually encodes proteins. Most of the rest is transcribed into RNA.
Some RNAs that don't carry the plans for proteins have important structural or functional roles in their own right. Transfer RNAs, for example, ferry specific amino acids into a growing protein, while ribosomal RNA constitutes part of the factories in cells that manufacture proteins.
But we are only just beginning to understand what many other non-coding RNA molecules do. Some control higher level functions such as the expression of protein-encoding genes, and some have even been implicated in memory.
Evolutionary differences
Parts of the genome that don't encode proteins tend to evolve rapidly, so you can have significant regions of the genome where there's no discernible similarity between species, says Moran. This means many sequences will not line up when you compare genomes between species.
And the further away two species are on the evolutionary tree, the greater the difference.
"If we compare really closely related species, like a human and chimpanzee, we can still see the similarity between these rapidly changing sequences. If you move further away to the more distantly related pig, so many changes in the DNA will have occurred that it is no longer possible to recognise that the sequences were ever similar.
"Depending upon what it is that you are comparing you can say 'Yes, there's a very high degree of similarity, for example between a human and a pig protein coding sequence', but if you compare rapidly evolving non-coding sequences from a similar location in the genome, you may not be able to recognise any similarity at all. This means that blanket comparisons of all DNA sequences between species are not very meaningful."
One area where comparison of genome sequences isn't all that relevant, says Moran, is the emerging science of transplanting organs and tissues from pigs to humans.
"[The success of pig-human transplants] has very little to do with whether there's a two per cent or 20 per cent difference in the genome sequence — if those numbers actually meant anything anyway — the main barrier is caused by just one gene," says Moran.
That gene is called galactose-alpha-1,3,galactotransferase — gal-transferase for short . All mammals except humans and higher apes have a working version of gal-transferase, which coats cells with an antigen (a molecule that our immune system reacts to). This means if pig tissue is transplanted into humans our immune system will mount a drastic rejection response as our bodies detect the antigen and attack it.
Scientists have come up with a solution to stop tissue rejection: genetically modifying the pigs by eliminating the gal-transferase gene. A few more human genes are also added to the pigs to make the pig tissue even more acceptable to our immune system.
So some pigs and humans are now even more alike."