Page 1 of 1

west africa to allow free movement of citizens

Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 2:59 pm
by sahal80
Good for west africa

http://www.africanglobe.net/africa/west ... -id-cards/

Abkeey indhoyareey have a dream of a unity but they have different political and economical ideologies...emperor ofJapan has accepted democracy for development saying that there can't be innovative ideas without free society.

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/featur ... 47688.html

Re: west africa to allow free movement of citizens

Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 6:52 pm
by Hararboy
Regions with a common goal are unifying as they see value in the strength derived by numbers, but we are going backwards. Instead we have Eritrea and Ethiopia who dont want to have reconciliation so then our population can have access to the Assab port and grow our economies and Eritreans would benefit in port jobs and revenue. Somalia still cant get over its clan system. We are going to be the last region to develop if we keep this up, sabotaging one another.

Re: west africa to allow free movement of citizens

Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 6:57 pm
by SahanGalbeed
Good for them, majority of the members of ECOWAS have the same currency francs CFA and the same official language french

Re: west africa to allow free movement of citizens

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 1:15 am
by Arcturus
Image

Examine The proximity of Senegal and Gambia, They attempted a Union and were able to Dissolve such a Union when it failed!

They are civilized in comparison to East Africans. The common trait of the east Africans is ENVY and a commitment to ZERO-SUM gains.

- Kenya is expansionist
- Ethiopia is Nepotist hellbent on Dominion
- Somalia-Italia is parasite
- Djibouti is the Africa's Redlight district
- Uganda is filled with cannibals
- Sudan arab lackeys
- South Sudan infentile
- Somaliland-Republic relegated
- Eritrea experiencing a time lag

Of the 56 African Countries How many are:
- BANTU lead?
- Arabite lead?
- Nilotic lead?
- Koshan/San lead?
- Cushitic lead?

Some of the countries of the Bantu's are smaller then Bakool. North-East Africans or members of Igad will never amount to anything significant in the next 1000years.

Re: west africa to allow free movement of citizens

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 7:33 am
by SahanGalbeed

Re: west africa to allow free movement of citizens

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 7:47 am
by LiquidHYDROGEN
Arcturus wrote:Image

Examine The proximity of Senegal and Gambia, They attempted a Union and were able to Dissolve such a Union when it failed!

They are civilized in comparison to East Africans. The common trait of the east Africans is ENVY and a commitment to ZERO-SUM gains.

- Kenya is expansionist
- Ethiopia is Nepotist hellbent on Dominion
- Somalia-Italia is parasite
- Djibouti is the Africa's Redlight district
- Uganda is filled with cannibals
- Sudan arab lackeys
- South Sudan infentile
- Somaliland-Republic relegated
- Eritrea experiencing a time lag

Of the 56 African Countries How many are:
- BANTU lead?
- Arabite lead?
- Nilotic lead?
- Koshan/San lead?
- Cushitic lead?

Some of the countries of the Bantu's are smaller then Bakool. North-East Africans or members of Igad will never amount to anything significant in the next 1000years.
West Africans have this magical concept that the braindead savages of HOA, particularly in Zoomalia and Aidstopia, have never heard of. It is a mystical concept able to unite people and build bridges so that progress can transpire. This mystical and powerful ancient spell was once used by great empires and nations throughout history to achieve wondrous things. Are you ready for it?

It's called compromise.

Re: west africa to allow free movement of citizens

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:40 pm
by Arcturus
Compromise?

Surely there are prerequisites to even Compromise?

- Trust? That one's action may solicit reciprocal reactions?

There is no Compromise with Ones willing to enter hell simply to source the flames to burn their neighbors home.