Ancient Egyptians related to Turks and Europeans, not Somalis

[paperino]

The first ever full-genome analysis of Ancient Egyptians shows they were more Turkish and European than African.

Scientists analysed ancient DNA from Egyptian mummies dating from 1400 BC to 400 AD and discovered they shared genes with people from the Mediterranean.

They found that ancient Egyptians were closely related to ancient populations in the Levant - now modern day Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Israel and Lebanon.

They were also genetically similar to Neolithic populations from the Anatolian Peninsula and Europe.

The groundbreaking study used recent advances in DNA sequencing techniques to undertake a closer examination of mummy genetics than ever before.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... opean.html

[Xildiiid]

Nonsense!

The samples they used were hyksos asiatics who had conquered northern parts of Egypt by 1650 BC and ironically all the samples used in this study was from the Nile Delta. The whole report is politicized, biased and the dailymail is using this to stir emotions among her alt right readers.

[paperino]

The study and findings was originally published on the scholarly Nature Communications journal:
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15694

We find that ancient Egyptians are most closely related to Neolithic and Bronze Age samples in the Levant, as well as to Neolithic Anatolian and European populations.

[KowJow]

You do realise that Somalis are also partially descended from those same Neolithic farmers that contributed the Eurasian ancestry to Ancient Egyptians and that they(NF) most probably spoke proto Afro-Asiatic which both Horners and Ancient Egyptians inherited from them. Both Genetics (uniparental&Autosomal studies) and linguistics show beyond doubt that Horners share a common ancestry with AEs . Only an idiot would deny that. And don't get me wrong, i'm not one of those "WE WUZ KANGS N SHIET" , i'm not claiming Somalis were Pharoahs or anything , just that we are closely related to other AA speaking peoples , more closely related to them than the average cadaan or west/ central African is.

[OAF]

You do realise that Somalis are also partially descended from those same Neolithic farmers that contributed the Eurasian ancestry to Ancient Egyptians and that they(NF) most probably spoke proto Afro-Asiatic which both Horners and Ancient Egyptians inherited from them. Both Genetics (uniparental&Autosomal studies) and linguistics show beyond doubt that Horners share a common ancestry with AEs . Only an idiot would deny that. And don't get me wrong, i'm not one of those "WE WUZ KANGS N SHIET" , i'm not claiming Somalis were Pharoahs or anything , just that we are closely related to other AA speaking peoples , more closely related to them than the average cadaan or west/ central African is.

Well we are definitely not arabs, so your into something and yeah we are actually kings and shiet.
Have you seen those black israeli videos from youtube? those blacks who claims they are the real chosen people.
They hate cushitic people as somali, oromo afar, and habesha people from eritrea and ethiopia + djibouti.
They claim we had them as slaves back in the kingdom of kush (which is the pharaoh)

[paperino]

The samples come from south of Cairo, not the Nile Delta as a poster erroneously claimed:

[Xildiiid]

The study posted in the dailymail was conducted in lower Egypt and the samples used, according to the time frame posted, were mummies from the second intermiediate period (civil war) when Hyksos (Asiatic tribes) invaded the Nile Delta, lower Egypt and established their own dynasty. Out of thin air the study makes a broad statement claiming that the Ancient Egyptians, in this case foreigners, were closely related to Anatolians and Europeans. It's ridiculous..


Linguistic and anthropological approach to Ancient Egyptian origin.

The origins of Egyptian ethnicity lay in the areas south of Egypt. The ancient Egyptian language belonged to the Afrasian family (also called Afroasiatic or, formerly, Hamito-Semitic). The speakers of the earliest Afrasian languages, according to recent studies, were a set of people whose lands between 15,000 and 13,000 B.C. stretched from Nubia in the west to far northern Somalia in the east. They supported themselves by gathering wild grains. The first elements of Egyptian culture were laid down two thousand years later, between 12,000 and 10,000 B.C., when some of these Afrasian communities expanded northward into Egypt, bringing with them a language directly ancestral to ancient Egyptian. They also introduced to Egypt the idea of using wild grains as food.

A new religion came with them as well. Its central tenet explains the often localized origins of later Egyptian gods: the earliest Afrasians were, properly speaking, neither monotheistic nor polytheistic. Instead, each local community, comprising a clan or a group of related clans, had its own distinct deity and centered its religious observances on that deity.


Christopher Ehret
Professor of History, University of California at Los Angeles

All the pre dynastic civilizations in northeast Africa and Horn of Africa were direct descendants of the earliest proto Afro-Asiatic speakers, who lived in an area stretching from Northern Sudan to Somaliland, for instance the Kerma Culture (Proto Cushitic), C-Group (Proto Berber) etc.

Bone and skull measurements/density carried out by European anthropologists also confirmed that the ancient Egyptians of the early dynastic period, Old Kingdom, first intermediate period and Middle Kingdom had similar bone structure as the modern people of the Horn of Africa.

[Strategic]

who cares?

[paperino]

The samples come from middle Egypt, not lower Egypt as the same poster once again made an erroneous claim:

The samples recovered from Middle Egypt span around 1,300 years of ancient Egyptian history from the New Kingdom to the Roman Period.

https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15694

[Xildiiid]

The dot on the map you posted is lower Egypt. The fact remains that the study is biased and you cannot challenge that Arabman.

[Damat]

The mummies sampled where obviously hyksos settlers. The researchers admit this is not representative of all Egypt.

As the genetic material comes from just one site in Middle Egypt, the researchers said the study may not be representative for all of ancient Egyptians.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2017 ... ns/8572076

[jamal9]

ancient egyptians originated from puntland.

[thehappyone]

ancient egyptians originated from puntland.

You're right

[Gaashaanle1000]

What most of you are not understanding is that this is all propaganda. The reason why they want to white wash ancient Egyptians is so that the current fake 13th tribe Jews can pass as being real, despite the fact that 60% of modern day Israelis will suffer with skin cancer at some point in their life.

For these Khazar Ashkhenazis to be real Israelites, and hence hold up Israel as being legitimate, then all of history must be rewritten. They must turn the Ancient Egyptians into their Turkish counsins (Khazars were Turkic speaking people themselves).

In reality I the ancient Egyptians were just black Africans, so when the African Americans say We Wuz Kangs, they are actually not lying!

[Saar]

Deal with it ..we are more related to Fiircoon than to Muhammad lol and no daily mail promoted fake news is gonna change that fact.

Cursed and most hated by allah Fiircoon... that's our kin.

Turks have a fucked origin story...they claim they come from wolves or some shit lol...close enough, they are neanderthals