Trump about to start War with Iran

[FAH1223]

John Bolton is so close to war his mustache can taste it.

[paperino]

fah, cut the bullsh*t and fake outrage! You weren't outraged nor said anything about your hero Obama and what he did to Libya.

[Django]

There will be no war against Iran.
US gave middle east to the shia on a silver platter.Onky Arabs are being fooled and minted.

[Nubis]

[FAH1223]

There will be no war against Iran.
US gave middle east to the shia on a silver platter.Onky Arabs are being fooled and minted.

[FAH1223]

[gurey25]

I doubt there will be a war, Bolton , Pompeo etc are examples of extreme stupidity but those crazy neocons do not have full control yet, there will be allot of internal opposition, and so many analysts from Cia, NSA drowning them in intelligence showing what war with Iran would be like.

First you must realize that Iran has been preparing for this since 1979 . The entire armed forces are designed to fight the US.

There will not be any limited attack on Iran, if a single bomb lands on Iranian soil they will launch everything, leading to full scale war.

Within the first 24 hours Iran will destroy the oil fields of Saudia and use with its latest generation missiles that they are totally immune to us patriot missiles , and integration of s400 will take at least 3 years so an Iran attack won't be stopped.
US bases in the Gulf will also be hit killing thousands within the first days.
Sadly we won't be seeing a carrier group sunk because although the politicians are morons the US Navy knows that it's carriers are obcselete and only usefully for bullying third world countries that can't fight back.
Any carrier group will be outside the Gulf in the Indian ocean near Oman.
A carrier group inside the Gulf will be sunk within hours of the start of the war the us has absolutely no defense at all, it's a sitting duck.

Within the first week oil production from Saudi and UAE at least 15 million barrels per day will be lost , and no one can make up this , leading to worldwide economic meltdown.
US dollar finally dies, so does world trade.

Iran is not Saddam Hussein , the first Gulf war was a unique event due to monumental stupidity.

The lessons learnt from Iraq and Yugoslavia and if you go back to world war 2 is that if you can hurt the armed forces you target civilians and bomb them straight to the Stone age.

When NATO bombed Serbia, it was discovered that after one of the largest bombing campaign in history they hit less than 10 % of targets.
They took out their frustration on civilians by bombing schools , hospitals, factories, water and sewage treatment plants and bridges .
This is what convinced the Serbs to surrender.

Iran's known the modus operandum , they will not wait to get bombed back into the Stone age like Iraq, they will insure they take out the world economy with them.

So no I have doubts there will be a war.

[FAH1223]

I doubt there will be a war, Bolton , Pompeo etc are examples of extreme stupidity but those crazy neocons do not have full control yet, there will be allot of internal opposition, and so many analysts from Cia, NSA drowning them in intelligence showing what war with Iran would be like.

First you must realize that Iran has been preparing for this since 1979 . The entire armed forces are designed to fight the US.

There will not be any limited attack on Iran, if a single bomb lands on Iranian soil they will launch everything, leading to full scale war.

Within the first 24 hours Iran will destroy the oil fields of Saudia and use with its latest generation missiles that they are totally immune to us patriot missiles , and integration of s400 will take at least 3 years so an Iran attack won't be stopped.
US bases in the Gulf will also be hit killing thousands within the first days.
Sadly we won't be seeing a carrier group sunk because although the politicians are morons the US Navy knows that it's carriers are obcselete and only usefully for bullying third world countries that can't fight back.
Any carrier group will be outside the Gulf in the Indian ocean near Oman.
A carrier group inside the Gulf will be sunk within hours of the start of the war the us has absolutely no defense at all, it's a sitting duck.

Within the first week oil production from Saudi and UAE at least 15 million barrels per day will be lost , and no one can make up this , leading to worldwide economic meltdown.
US dollar finally dies, so does world trade.

Iran is not Saddam Hussein , the first Gulf war was a unique event due to monumental stupidity.

The lessons learnt from Iraq and Yugoslavia and if you go back to world war 2 is that if you can hurt the armed forces you target civilians and bomb them straight to the Stone age.

When NATO bombed Serbia, it was discovered that after one of the largest bombing campaign in history they hit less than 10 % of targets.
They took out their frustration on civilians by bombing schools , hospitals, factories, water and sewage treatment plants and bridges .
This is what convinced the Serbs to surrender.

Iran's known the modus operandum , they will not wait to get bombed back into the Stone age like Iraq, they will insure they take out the world economy with them.

So no I have doubts there will be a war.

Trump is the Mad King bro... just today!

[paperino]

It looks like fah has been brainwashed by MSM, and suffers from Trump Derangement Syndrome.

[gurey25]

Ironically I find Trump to be the most sane amongst those psychos.
He likes talking shut and saying outrageous things he doesn't mean, .

[Django]

There is no war US has ever engaged alone without European support.

The only country to be a superpower without asserting itself into the world like others.They just waited for the WW2 to end.

[Django]

There is no war US has ever engaged alone without European support.

The only country to be a superpower without asserting itself into the world like others.They just waited for the WW2 to end.

[gurey25]

The US and UK are war mongers they started WW2.
Churchill was pushing for war with Germany for years and finally succeeded by tricking the dumb poles into starting a war with the Germans by abusing German civilians and walking out of negotiations.
And FDR deliberately started a war with Japan by hitting them with crippling sanctions that gave them the choice of a humiliating surrender to the US or war, they chose to go down fighting on their feet rather than going on their knees and we got pearl harbor.
FDR was delighted.

History is written by the victors everything you learned about history of Europe is British mythology and propaganda.

[TheGrumpyGeeljire]

The US and UK are war mongers they started WW2.
Churchill was pushing for war with Germany for years and finally succeeded by tricking the dumb poles into starting a war with the Germans by abusing German civilians and walking out of negotiations.
And FDR deliberately started a war with Japan by hitting them with crippling sanctions that gave them the choice of a humiliating surrender to the US or war, they chose to go down fighting on their feet rather than going on their knees and we got pearl harbor.
FDR was delighted.

History is written by the victors everything you learned about history of Europe is British mythology and propaganda.

Bro send me your sources. I am loving this alternative view of WW2. I believe you but I don't know where to get books that admit as much.

[gurey25]

The US and UK are war mongers they started WW2.
Churchill was pushing for war with Germany for years and finally succeeded by tricking the dumb poles into starting a war with the Germans by abusing German civilians and walking out of negotiations.
And FDR deliberately started a war with Japan by hitting them with crippling sanctions that gave them the choice of a humiliating surrender to the US or war, they chose to go down fighting on their feet rather than going on their knees and we got pearl harbor.
FDR was delighted.

History is written by the victors everything you learned about history of Europe is British mythology and propaganda.

Bro send me your sources. I am loving this alternative view of WW2. I believe you but I don't know where to get books that admit as much.

My sources are practically every single history book about the period ever published, I can get you a list but it's unnecessary because any book you pickup from a library will contain all I said in my post because they are facts.

The way their propaganda works is by deflecting attention and pushing own narrative , if they omit facts they will be caught out so they minimize attention and hide them away in the corner.
News stories also work the same.

Every book about Churchill will tell you about his hatred for Hitler and the nazi party as soon as Germany started getting back on its feet.
The reason is Churchill was an agressive mad dog that didn't care about the consequences and wanted war as soon as possible by any means necessary.
The establishment had the same hostility but we're thinking long-term and sensibly because British rearmament would not be complete till 1941
Yes even the great appeaser chamberlain Mr peace in our time would have found a way to start a war with Germany and destroy it because it is British strategic policy since 1700 never allowing a single state to dominate Europe.

Churchill and the French interfering between Poland and Germany is a fact .
During negotiations in which Germany was willing to concede allot of land in exchange for a fair settlement the British and French give the poles gaurentees against Germany if the talks don't succeed.
The dumb poles believed that since the French outnumbered the German army 2 to one in manpower and equipment not including the British they did not have to negotiate,maybe they thought they could gain some extra land from Germany when it eventually loses.

They failed to account for the change in the nature of warfare in this blitzkrieg and combined arms .

It's all there in the open they bother to hide it they can't because they have to include facts .
Even the biggest works of western propaganda you will find what I just said .

And after all I said you still don't want to search for yourself, you can look at any book by John Keegan.
Chester Willmott : The struggle for Europe
And David Irving's 'churchill, a struggle for power'