wel done europe, the us and israel are in big trouble, you reap what you sow
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/758607.html
THE BEGINNING OF THE END OF THE ZIONIST STATE OF ISRAEL
Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators
Forum rules
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
- fagash_killer
- SomaliNet Super
- Posts: 13942
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:28 pm
- Location: And You Can Run For ya Back-up But Them Machine Gun Shells Gone Tear Ya back Up
THE BEGINNING OF THE END OF THE ZIONIST STATE OF ISRAEL
Last edited by fagash_killer on Mon Sep 04, 2006 12:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- fagash_killer
- SomaliNet Super
- Posts: 13942
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:28 pm
- Location: And You Can Run For ya Back-up But Them Machine Gun Shells Gone Tear Ya back Up
- Grant
- SomaliNet Super
- Posts: 5845
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 1:43 pm
- Location: Wherever you go, there you are.
http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=1208
"A Western military expert remarked to DEBKAfile that the European naval forces cruising off Lebanese shores are roughly ten times as much as the UNIFIL contingents require as cover, especially when UNIFILÂ’s duties are strictly non-combat. After all, none of the UN contingents will be engaged in disarming Hizballah or blocking the flow of weapons incoming from Syria and Iran.
So, if not for Lebanon, what is this fine array of naval power really there for?
First, according to our military sources, the European participants feel the need of a strong naval presence in the eastern Mediterranean to prevent a possible Iranian-US-Israeli war igniting an Iranian long-range Shahab missile attack on Europe; second, as a deterrent to dissuade Syria and Hizballah from opening a second front against American and Israel from their eastern Mediterranean coasts.
Numbers alone do not do justice to the immense operational capabilities and firepower amassed opposite Lebanon. Take first the three fleet flagships.
From FranceÂ’s nuclear-powered 38,000-ton Charles De Gaulle carrier (see insignia), 40 Rafale M fighter craft whose range is 3,340 km can take off at intervals of 30 seconds. The ship also carries three E-2C Hawkeye surveillance craft. The combat control center of the French carrier can handle 2,000 simultaneous targets. The carrier leads a task fore of 7 warships carrying 2,800 French Marines.
Charles De Gaulle s also a floating logistics center operating water desalination plants for 15,000 men and enough food to feed an army for 90 days.
The USS Mount Whitney (the tallest snowcapped peak in the United States), has the most sophisticated command and control suite in the world. Like the French Charles De Gaulle , it exercises command over a task force of 1,800 sailors, Marines, Air force medical and other personnel serving aboard the USS Barry, the USS Trenton , HSV Swift and USNS Kanawha .
Available to the fleet commander, US Vice Admiral J. “Boomer” Stufflebeem, formally titled commander of Joint Task Force Lebanon, is the uniquely advanced C41 command and intelligence system through which he can flash intelligence ...."
"A Western military expert remarked to DEBKAfile that the European naval forces cruising off Lebanese shores are roughly ten times as much as the UNIFIL contingents require as cover, especially when UNIFILÂ’s duties are strictly non-combat. After all, none of the UN contingents will be engaged in disarming Hizballah or blocking the flow of weapons incoming from Syria and Iran.
So, if not for Lebanon, what is this fine array of naval power really there for?
First, according to our military sources, the European participants feel the need of a strong naval presence in the eastern Mediterranean to prevent a possible Iranian-US-Israeli war igniting an Iranian long-range Shahab missile attack on Europe; second, as a deterrent to dissuade Syria and Hizballah from opening a second front against American and Israel from their eastern Mediterranean coasts.
Numbers alone do not do justice to the immense operational capabilities and firepower amassed opposite Lebanon. Take first the three fleet flagships.
From FranceÂ’s nuclear-powered 38,000-ton Charles De Gaulle carrier (see insignia), 40 Rafale M fighter craft whose range is 3,340 km can take off at intervals of 30 seconds. The ship also carries three E-2C Hawkeye surveillance craft. The combat control center of the French carrier can handle 2,000 simultaneous targets. The carrier leads a task fore of 7 warships carrying 2,800 French Marines.
Charles De Gaulle s also a floating logistics center operating water desalination plants for 15,000 men and enough food to feed an army for 90 days.
The USS Mount Whitney (the tallest snowcapped peak in the United States), has the most sophisticated command and control suite in the world. Like the French Charles De Gaulle , it exercises command over a task force of 1,800 sailors, Marines, Air force medical and other personnel serving aboard the USS Barry, the USS Trenton , HSV Swift and USNS Kanawha .
Available to the fleet commander, US Vice Admiral J. “Boomer” Stufflebeem, formally titled commander of Joint Task Force Lebanon, is the uniquely advanced C41 command and intelligence system through which he can flash intelligence ...."
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 349 Views
-
Last post by fagash_killer
-
- 13 Replies
- 1202 Views
-
Last post by Basra-
-
- 7 Replies
- 1232 Views
-
Last post by jalaaludin5
-
- 15 Replies
- 719 Views
-
Last post by MAD MAC
-
- 6 Replies
- 480 Views
-
Last post by ToughGong
-
- 32 Replies
- 1909 Views
-
Last post by maria from west side
-
- 75 Replies
- 4739 Views
-
Last post by avowedly-agnostic
-
- 19 Replies
- 1047 Views
-
Last post by STARKAST
-
- 25 Replies
- 2341 Views
-
Last post by FAH1223
-
- 8 Replies
- 783 Views
-
Last post by mody21