Are White People ultimately Superior Race??

[Basra-]

What Makes a White person more advanced or successeful than the Black race, or more precisely, the Africans. Does it have to do with inherent genes or simply a matter of circumstantial, environment issue. We can all assume we were all once all WHITE oR BLACK-- i tend to believe we were once all WHITE when Prophet adam was removed of heaven. The heat of african continent, no doubt being close to heaven, hence sun or sky--its scotching hot darken their skin. I believe the more man immigrated furthest from the equator, from the heat the more he transformed in his pale white pigmentation and natural state of appearance.So really skin color obviously here is NOT the issue. The issue really is --all about "Superiority class of the Brain organ"! Why is that-- the more u lean towards Black -- u r dumber, more savage, less succesesful and certainly plagued with all sorts of diseases. Now the more you lean towards Whites-- meaning u know-- possesing the features of a white race-- white pale skin color, timo jalec, none dark color eyes-- the more you are less savage, ,more intelligent, prosperous. etc etc --White of course being in the pedestal pinacle of besthood--ranging down to asians, indians, arabs, somalis, tutsi, and the hutus being at the bottom of superiority, prosperousness and u know savagery class.My question is-- what is it about a human leaning furthest from original Niggernes makes them more intelligent and the closest to Niggerness makes them closest to chimps-- their neighborly jungle friends. Obviously this is a science beyond skin color or size of nose-- its something imbred in the genes, of Bilogogy; this brain organ particularly.Is an Adoon brain biological makeup close to a chimp? Are Niggers ultimately handicaps by nature? And are White brain ultimately fully evolved sort of brain that has metaphosised into a refined statehood? Is the brain an ever evolving organ? Are asians brains half, fully evolved?(this will explain their bad driving handicapibility) Indinas following of course and are Somalis,(excluding hawiyes of course)--God forbid-- posses a little better brain organ than their immediate counter part neighbor the adoons in the diaspora?



HHHHHmmmmmmm ??? Something to ponder, dont you think so?


Your humble thoughts? 8)

[FAH1223]

Go back to history

The whites were barbarians in Europe at one point, while the world of color was ahead of them in every facet and form

Why do you like white people so much though? I guess you love the gaalo at work too much

[Grant]

As a group, Asians in the US do better academically than any other.

If you go by Nobel prizes, then the Jews are way, way ahead of everybody else, and they are Semites, the same as the Arabs.

[*zabah]

[Basra-]

Fah

True. Whites were Barbarians once, even Canivorous if we want to go there, but it has been a long, long time since then. They have gone through transformation, my question is--during this time--where were africans?? If these supposed Whites-- lets assume-- the primitive Vikings--were barbarians-- africans must have been WORST Barbarian. Unless u tell,- africans were not in existance st that times. My question is--how come africans were 'late' to transform from savagery ? Why did it have to be White people civilizing black africans??? Which returns me to my original question-- is White race --diabolically a better advanced race than the Black by default?? 8)

Grant


oh Please dont include the jews on every little topic please. Besides jews rant below arabs in the hierarchy of brain organ.

[adanboy]

Thats racism..Satan is chained in the holy month of Ramadan ,but the human type is loose..here is a clear prove

[*zabah]

talk about inferiority complex..

[FAH1223]

[quote="Basra-"]Fah

True. Whites were Barbarians once, even Canivorous if we want to go there, but it has been a long, long time since then. They have gone through transformation, my question is--during this time--where were africans?? If these supposed Whites-- lets assume-- the primitive Vikings--were barbarians-- africans must have been WORST Barbarian. Unless u tell,- africans were not in existance at times. My question is--how come africans were 'late' to transform from savagery? Why did it have to be White people civilizing black africans??? Which returns me to my original question-- is White race --diabolically a better advanced race than the Black?? 8) [/quote]

Africans had many empires on the continent, that advanced civilization in many ways. Throughout the times

[Basra-]

[quote="FAH1223"][quote="Basra-"]Fah

True. Whites were Barbarians once, even Canivorous if we want to go there, but it has been a long, long time since then. They have gone through transformation, my question is--during this time--where were africans?? If these supposed Whites-- lets assume-- the primitive Vikings--were barbarians-- africans must have been WORST Barbarian. Unless u tell,- africans were not in existance at times. My question is--how come africans were 'late' to transform from savagery? Why did it have to be White people civilizing black africans??? Which returns me to my original question-- is White race --diabolically a better advanced race than the Black?? 8) [/quote]

Africans had many empires on the continent, that advanced civilization in many ways. Throughout the times[/quote]


Fah


Those civilization & so called empires were not ran by REAL AFRICANS, meaning nigggers or adoon. They were either Egyptians or some arab merchants-- and they were not that civilized, at least NOT more than the greeks empires or the romans.

[Grant]

Basra,

The descendants of the Ashanti will disagree with you, as will folks aware of the kingdoms of Axum, Ghana, Mali, Songhai, Zimbabwe, or Benin. ...

While you may accept the Auxumites as non-adoon, the rest, well........

[Basra-]

[quote="Grant"]Basra,

The descendants of the Ashanti will disagree with you, as will folks aware of the kingdoms of Axum, Ghana, Mali, Songhai, Zimbabwe, or Benin. ...

While you may accept the Auxumites as non-adoon, the rest, well........[/quote]


Grant then why are the ghanas,the malis and God knows-- what-- WHY are they nothing today? Why is former romans today --Italy. Former Greek today Greece. Former Babylon today as Iraq and Iran. Why are they so much better in every way countable for civilization?????? Can u explain that?? Africans seemed doomed in staying in a black hole. Thus prooving my point -- africans do suffer an inherent handicap of a brain.

[Metal]

Statistically, Jews are the most superior single group of people on Earth, but I'm not sure if they qualify as a race since there are Black Jews, White Jews, and the classic Hook-Nosed Jews.

[Grant]

Basra,

That's like asking how the Ottoman Turks were able to conquer the Eastern Roman Empire.

Greece and Italy dominate little to nothing today, but both once ruled the known world. Things change.

[Basra-]

Metal

jewism is a religion dominiom, it cannot be chosen as a human race. They go under White category. Of course not the 'gentile' white but white in the bottom rank close to arabs or indians. U get me now?

[Basra-]

[quote="Grant"]Basra,

That's like asking how the Ottoman Turks were able to conquer the Eastern Roman Empire.

Greece and Italy dominate little to nothing today, but both once ruled the known world. Things change.[/quote]


Grant

I agree. Thing change. And my question is WHY doesn't african change? Why this perpetual constant poverty and mayhem?? Italy and greece may not rule the world-- but are considered part of the first world or at leasst second when it comes to prosperity etc etc . My question here is-- Why black race always lark behind?