jalaaludin5 wrote:













Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators
jalaaludin5 wrote:
From my own experience I've found that conflict theories are touched on in intro classes but are impossible to not come across in your later years. Nonetheless, that isn't reflective of how "serious" the discipline is taken.UlteriorMotive wrote:
I beg to differ lol. I think it's offered just so you can get an alternative view of things for the sake of completeness. You'll go through a whole semester
wrestling with the main issues of a topic before you quickly touch on what feminists and Marxists have to say about it. Well, from my experience anyway.
That's the point I was trying to make. It's not as simple as gender ONLY. That's where hardcore feminists lose the plot.
Lol I know that but what does that have to do with anything. Class conflict is a central tenet of communism. Do you disagree?
''Class reductionism'' is a frequent criticism of Marxism. It is the mistake of reducing all forms of oppression, e.g. racism, to economic inequalities.
yungnfresh wrote:viewtopic.php?f=18&t=260068BlackVelvet wrote:"Be a man" is what you would say when encouraging a male to be strong or play his traditional role as a provider and protector. I had a huge problem with the phrase "don't be such a girl" but really when you think about it, girls are delicate and a boy should not behave like a girl.
A year and a half later (to the day) and u've seen the light...I'd like to take this opportunity to take full credit for showing it to u
anndddd narrows it down to patriarchyAgain, feminism examines the social, political and economic factors