You are not a president if you need foreign troops to protect you in your own capital, let us not insult the name president we saw in 21 years what a real president was. You are not a real government if you do not even control the areas you claim.
Stop calling Shaikh Sharif president
Moderator: Moderators
- Hyperactive
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 34540
- Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:36 am
- Location: "Some people are so poor, all they have is money."
Re: Stop calling Shaikh Sharif president
Allaho dadkan qalbigooda jirada ka dawee!
- afisoone
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 5509
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:46 pm
- Location: We all want to become president even though Amisom controls Mogadishu
Re: Stop calling Shaikh Sharif president
Welcome on board.. Really, I have been telling everybody that statements for the last 3 years.
They never listen about that...
They never listen about that...
Re: Stop calling Shaikh Sharif president
You need to read your history books before posting this kind of thing. This country that I live in had their whole government and military establishment living in London during the World War II. They did not control a square mile of land , yet in the eyes of the world, they were the legitimate government. You can dislike Shariif, but his is the most legitimate of positions. His is a position where all Somalis can compete and hold. His is a position that representatives for all Somalis can vote on. The alternatives are clan enclaves ruled by clan militias loyal to minions ( I have no respect for clan regional governments, even my clans) . I can't recall a modern state where there are so many presidents, or where governors are refered to as president. Get real.
- afisoone
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 5509
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:46 pm
- Location: We all want to become president even though Amisom controls Mogadishu
Re: Stop calling Shaikh Sharif president
Hahaha. What country is that? they must the slaves of British. Why you guys depend on those provocative history. Not long ago Syria was controlled by the Romans. In the eyes of Arabs, they were Romans, but they were Arabs......................... Those are not good history and we don't want to associate such a history in our world...Shaarib24 wrote:You need to read your history books before posting this kind of thing. This country that I live in had their whole government and military establishment living in London during the World War II. They did not control a square mile of land , yet in the eyes of the world, they were the legitimate government. You can dislike Shariif, but his is the most legitimate of positions. His is a position where all Somalis can compete and hold. His is a position that representatives for all Somalis can vote on. The alternatives are clan enclaves ruled by clan militias loyal to minions ( I have no respect for clan regional governments, even my clans) . I can't recall a modern state where there are so many presidents, or where governors are refered to as president. Get real.
Re: Stop calling Shaikh Sharif president
Sheikh Sharif was a Good President.
Noloow Shariif Noloow. In order to restore peace Security and Stabilty & to bring Somali back, Foriegn troops approved by the Somali Parliament representing the Somali People had to be used to help & train our Forces. 
- TheblueNwhite
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 11301
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:34 pm
- Contact:
Re: Stop calling Shaikh Sharif president
Xafidullaah H.E. president Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed. Nooloow.

Re: Stop calling Shaikh Sharif president
As the leader of ICU/al-Shabaab, Sheikh Sharif didn't need foreign troops for protection. Therefore, he qualifies to be called president.Zuluc wrote:You are not a president if you need foreign troops to protect you in your own capital, let us not insult the name president we saw in 21 years what a real president was. You are not a real government if you do not even control the areas you claim.
Re: Stop calling Shaikh Sharif president
Actually it is the country of NORWAY; A country that has almost consistently have been among the top 3 among those with the best standard of living. Read something on second World War and you'll be surprised how many countries had their government in exile, who never lost the legitimacy.afisoone wrote:Hahaha. What country is that? they must the slaves of British. Why you guys depend on those provocative history. Not long ago Syria was controlled by the Romans. In the eyes of Arabs, they were Romans, but they were Arabs......................... Those are not good history and we don't want to associate such a history in our world...Shaarib24 wrote:You need to read your history books before posting this kind of thing. This country that I live in had their whole government and military establishment living in London during the World War II. They did not control a square mile of land , yet in the eyes of the world, they were the legitimate government. You can dislike Shariif, but his is the most legitimate of positions. His is a position where all Somalis can compete and hold. His is a position that representatives for all Somalis can vote on. The alternatives are clan enclaves ruled by clan militias loyal to minions ( I have no respect for clan regional governments, even my clans) . I can't recall a modern state where there are so many presidents, or where governors are refered to as president. Get real.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 906 Views
-
Last post by Somalian_Boqor
-
- 5 Replies
- 776 Views
-
Last post by Somalian_Boqor
-
- 0 Replies
- 5 Views
-
Last post by Somalian_Boqor
-
- 2 Replies
- 654 Views
-
Last post by DR-YALAXOOW
-
- 4 Replies
- 540 Views
-
Last post by Mentally-ill-MAN
-
- 5 Replies
- 809 Views
-
Last post by metamorphosis
-
- 3 Replies
- 994 Views
-
Last post by AlpArsalan
-
- 19 Replies
- 1533 Views
-
Last post by axmadgurey
-
- 19 Replies
- 1806 Views
-
Last post by LivingToSucceed
-
- 18 Replies
- 114 Views
-
Last post by Addoow
