In 1960, somaliland was far behind the south
Moderator: Moderators
In 1960, somaliland was far behind the south
The two decades between 1900 and 1920 were a period of colonial consolidation. However, of the colonial powers that had divided the Somalis, only Italy developed a comprehensive administrative plan for its colony. The Italians intended to plant a colony of settlers and commercial entrepreneurs in the region between the Shabeelle and Jubba rivers in southern Somalia. The motivation was threefold: to "relieve population pressure at home," to offer the "civilizing Roman mission" to the Somalis, and to increase Italian prestige through overseas colonization. Initiated by Governor Carletti (1906-10), Italy's colonial program received further impetus by the introduction of fascist ideology and economic planning in the 1920s, particularly during the administration of Governor Cesare Maria de Vecchi de Val Cismon. Large-scale development projects were launched, including a system of plantations on which citrus fruits, primarily bananas, and sugarcane, were grown. Sugarcane fields in Giohar and numerous banana plantations around the town of Jannaale on the Shabeelle River, and at the southern mouth of the Jubba River near Chisimayu, helped transform southern Somalia's economy.
In contrast to the Italian colony, British Somaliland stayed a neglected backwater. Daunted by the diversion of substantial development funds to the suppression of the dervish insurrection and by the "wild" character of the anarchic Somali pastoralists, Britain used its colony as little more than a supplier of meat products to Aden. This policy had a tragic effect on the future unity and stability of independent Somalia. When the two former colonies merged to form the Somali Republic in 1960, the north lagged far behind the south in economic infrastructure and skilled labor. As a result, southerners gradually came to dominate the new state's economic and political life--a hegemony that bred a sense of betrayal and bitterness among northerners.
http://countrystudies.us/somalia/11.htm
In contrast to the Italian colony, British Somaliland stayed a neglected backwater. Daunted by the diversion of substantial development funds to the suppression of the dervish insurrection and by the "wild" character of the anarchic Somali pastoralists, Britain used its colony as little more than a supplier of meat products to Aden. This policy had a tragic effect on the future unity and stability of independent Somalia. When the two former colonies merged to form the Somali Republic in 1960, the north lagged far behind the south in economic infrastructure and skilled labor. As a result, southerners gradually came to dominate the new state's economic and political life--a hegemony that bred a sense of betrayal and bitterness among northerners.
http://countrystudies.us/somalia/11.htm
- LiquidHYDROGEN
- SomaliNet Super
- Posts: 14522
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 10:48 am
- Location: Back home in Old Kush
Re: In 1960, somaliland was far behind the south
Figures. Somaliland was a british protectorate in name only.
- Thuganomics
- Posts: 14075
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:56 pm
- Location: Arguments gain nothing but resentment, Disscussion however creates learning
Re: In 1960, somaliland was far behind the south
Markaana...
Re: In 1960, somaliland was far behind the south
that is why southerners dominated the new state?
- Thuganomics
- Posts: 14075
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:56 pm
- Location: Arguments gain nothing but resentment, Disscussion however creates learning
Re: In 1960, somaliland was far behind the south
OK then! Carry on regardless.....
-
- SomaliNet Super
- Posts: 11028
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 6:21 pm
Re: In 1960, somaliland was far behind the south
it was nothing to do with infrastructure or development, this is highlighted by the majority of the government being from the north east - and there was next to no development there
- SultanOrder
- Posts: 21697
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:10 pm
- Location: Peace!
Re: In 1960, somaliland was far behind the south
Taatiko, actually it's the opposite. After the Union, the norther civil service, which was more well trained then their souther counterparts, dominated in Mogadishu. So much so, that southern civil service employees felt threatened, and tried to prevent them from taking over.
Re: In 1960, somaliland was far behind the south
Both places excelled in certain areas. For example, what Perfect_Order said.
The housing for government workers was "Casa populare" in Hodan District. This was inhabited by government workers, primarily from Somaliland.
The housing for government workers was "Casa populare" in Hodan District. This was inhabited by government workers, primarily from Somaliland.
Re: In 1960, somaliland was far behind the south
Ok it is true that british were useless than Italians? according this report? 

-
- SomaliNet Super
- Posts: 29468
- Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:08 pm
Re: In 1960, somaliland was far behind the south
And they say they were better off under the British....even though the British were in Hargeisa for 80 years and never built a single bridge, to save the lives of people who would be washed away every rainy season.
The secessionists have built their project on hate and lies.
Everything they have now was built by the Siad Barre (aun) regime, hospitals, roads, ports, universities, cement plants etc.
The British didn`t even build toilets for them.
The secessionists have built their project on hate and lies.
Everything they have now was built by the Siad Barre (aun) regime, hospitals, roads, ports, universities, cement plants etc.
The British didn`t even build toilets for them.
- Thuganomics
- Posts: 14075
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:56 pm
- Location: Arguments gain nothing but resentment, Disscussion however creates learning
Re: In 1960, somaliland was far behind the south
original dervish wrote:And they say they were better off under the British....even though the British were in Hargeisa for 80 years and never built a single bridge, to save the lives of people who would be washed away every rainy season.
The secessionists have built their project on hate and lies.
Everything they have now was built by the Siad Barre (aun) regime, hospitals, roads, ports, universities, cement plants etc.
The British didn`t even build toilets for them.
You keep spewing the same crap about Afwayne building things in HRG and I keep asking you the same Q every time aad waxaa tidhaadid
Why didn't Afwayne build his own city if what you say is true.Because it's not true that's why

Re: In 1960, somaliland was far behind the south
so kacaanka and british did nothing for North somalia
- Tanker
- SomaliNet Heavyweight
- Posts: 3607
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 4:59 pm
- Location: Enjoying my life :) I am so happy ! and endless succes has arrived in my life
Re: In 1960, somaliland was far behind the south
Thug
You actually proved that Siyad Barre AUN was a Nationalist if he was a Tribalist he will had used the govenment money to build Gedo, but as a true Nationalist all the money was used on Benadir and to some degree Hargaisa.
You actually proved that Siyad Barre AUN was a Nationalist if he was a Tribalist he will had used the govenment money to build Gedo, but as a true Nationalist all the money was used on Benadir and to some degree Hargaisa.
- Thuganomics
- Posts: 14075
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:56 pm
- Location: Arguments gain nothing but resentment, Disscussion however creates learning
Re: In 1960, somaliland was far behind the south
Not really.I just proved he didn't build shit in the north
Re: In 1960, somaliland was far behind the south
TAATIKO wrote:The two decades between 1900 and 1920 were a period of colonial consolidation. However, of the colonial powers that had divided the Somalis, only Italy developed a comprehensive administrative plan for its colony. The Italians intended to plant a colony of settlers and commercial entrepreneurs in the region between the Shabeelle and Jubba rivers in southern Somalia. The motivation was threefold: to "relieve population pressure at home," to offer the "civilizing Roman mission" to the Somalis, and to increase Italian prestige through overseas colonization. Initiated by Governor Carletti (1906-10), Italy's colonial program received further impetus by the introduction of fascist ideology and economic planning in the 1920s, particularly during the administration of Governor Cesare Maria de Vecchi de Val Cismon. Large-scale development projects were launched, including a system of plantations on which citrus fruits, primarily bananas, and sugarcane, were grown. Sugarcane fields in Giohar and numerous banana plantations around the town of Jannaale on the Shabeelle River, and at the southern mouth of the Jubba River near Chisimayu, helped transform southern Somalia's economy.
In contrast to the Italian colony, British Somaliland stayed a neglected backwater. Daunted by the diversion of substantial development funds to the suppression of the dervish insurrection and by the "wild" character of the anarchic Somali pastoralists, Britain used its colony as little more than a supplier of meat products to Aden. This policy had a tragic effect on the future unity and stability of independent Somalia. When the two former colonies merged to form the Somali Republic in 1960, the north lagged far behind the south in economic infrastructure and skilled labor. As a result, southerners gradually came to dominate the new state's economic and political life--a hegemony that bred a sense of betrayal and bitterness among northerners.
http://countrystudies.us/somalia/11.htm

-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 67 Replies
- 90514 Views
-
Last post by Khalid Ali
-
- 15 Replies
- 1208 Views
-
Last post by MrPrestige
-
- 4 Replies
- 19 Views
-
Last post by Cardiff Girl
-
- 48 Replies
- 61650 Views
-
Last post by Thuganomics
-
- 0 Replies
- 340 Views
-
Last post by Adan_1
-
- 3 Replies
- 1343 Views
-
Last post by Luq_Ganane
-
- 12 Replies
- 1145 Views
-
Last post by MrPrestige
-
- 5 Replies
- 786 Views
-
Last post by The Magnificent
-
- 17 Replies
- 1860 Views
-
Last post by The_Emperior5