sophisticate wrote:I say round the horn dogs up and have them spade or neutered
Very western notion you have there Johnson. You realize one can still not have a monotheistic belief system, say animalism or Hinduism and still believe in copulation within the confines of marriage.
What is the difference between a promiscuous person and one that is serially monogamous with regard to their sexual encounters? Seems to be the same thing to me. Shagging is shagging no matter how nuanced or sugar coated you make it out to be. However, better have some religious in your case legal entitlements as a form of security so the individual is at least culpable. There seriously is nothing fun about liaisons with only a short-term gain, hit them where it hurts and make them pay - socially and financially (nothing is for free and neither is a cookie). Also, can you really trust this other person? Do they have sexual discipline? - How can you be for certain unless they are celibate or do a survey of their past sexual encounters, kind of misleading as many of these people are disingenuous. It's much easier hating humans, plotting to destroy them and remaining abstinent, your mind never waivers and you simply just want to poison their water.
Wretched people with opposable thumbs.
I loathe you all.
Signed,
The Misanthropist.
I find it shocking that would type an essay to defend your adulterous Ho.e career. It seems breath-taking at how earnest and honest you are with the love of a Gu.s. Disgustingly Sophisicated I say.


you are becoming like secretagent, you need to do some background checks.
