Poor poor

Daily chitchat.

Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators

Forum rules
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
User avatar
Malachite
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2209
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:21 pm
Location: 50,000 feet above you, dropping JDAMs

Poor poor

Post by Malachite »

I was reading this
Developers Installed a 'Poor Door' and a 'Rich Door' on a London Apartment Building

London is a landmark of inequality. The top tenth of the city’s workers earn around four and a half times as much as the bottom tenth, a bigger divide than anywhere else in the country, and that latter group are being pushed out of their homes to make way for new luxury apartments marketed to people who will never live in them. Social cleansing disguised as “regeneration” by developers and local governments.

There’s probably no more tangible example of this than the “poor doors” installed at One Commercial Street, a luxury apartment building in the East End. Home to a number of tenants receiving government benefits for their housing, as well as all the affluent city workers the whole thing was presumably built for, there are two separate doors to the building: one for the rich, one for the poor. The rich door involves smoked glass and a concierge; the poor door is off an alley favored by drunk weekend warriors stumbling around after getting a late night snack. http://www.vice.com/read/one-commercial ... rotest-101
Who thinks of these kind of things? Having separate doors based on income? WTF? ...Who would feel flattered by using the rich door? I'd feel embarrassed to live in a building where the difference between people is made so obvious and degrading.

Lovely neighborhood parties, I imagine.
User avatar
Lillaahiya
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 9782
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:35 am

Re: Poor poor

Post by Lillaahiya »

Gentrification is real but this is an odd example. Here in Canada, you'll find government housing beside homes that retail for 250-300k easily. You'll also find construction for new condos in sketchy/ghetto places. However; you'd never see a building with a "rich" and "poor" side with separate entrances.
User avatar
Methylamine
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 6362
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:22 pm

Re: Poor poor

Post by Methylamine »

England is also full of lazy folk, this rich/poor entrances should motivate these people (the able-bodied ones of course) to stop collecting caydh and do some meaningful work
User avatar
Lillaahiya
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 9782
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:35 am

Re: Poor poor

Post by Lillaahiya »

^ Perpetuating the notion that people who collect benefits are lazy & 'meaningful' work is abundant
User avatar
Methylamine
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 6362
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:22 pm

Re: Poor poor

Post by Methylamine »

Lillaahiya wrote:^ Perpetuating the notion that people who collect benefits are lazy & 'meaningful' work is abundant
Able-bodied people who can find work but choose to collect benefits are lazy and I never said work is abundant.
User avatar
Lillaahiya
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 9782
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:35 am

Re: Poor poor

Post by Lillaahiya »

Most able bodied people aren't on benefits
User avatar
Methylamine
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 6362
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:22 pm

Re: Poor poor

Post by Methylamine »

Did I say most of them were on benefits?
User avatar
Lillaahiya
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 9782
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:35 am

Re: Poor poor

Post by Lillaahiya »

So you're address outliers?
User avatar
Amira143
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 4471
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2014 6:47 am

Re: Poor poor

Post by Amira143 »

Who in their right mind approved this crappy idea and actually took measures to put it in place? Yaab. Are we back to the "Only Whites" era. This splitting mechanism is for "them" to divide and concur. What's next, rich and poor busses or park benches. Discrimination has become so obvious nowadays. Smh.
User avatar
Methylamine
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 6362
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:22 pm

Re: Poor poor

Post by Methylamine »

Lillaahiya wrote:So you're address outliers?
I'm addressing those who could be working but choose to live at the expense of the government. Up to you to decide whether or not they're outliers in the population of people who collect benefits
User avatar
Lillaahiya
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 9782
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:35 am

Re: Poor poor

Post by Lillaahiya »

I love how you take my troll attempts seriously :lol:
User avatar
Methylamine
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 6362
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:22 pm

Re: Poor poor

Post by Methylamine »

Lillaahiya wrote:I love how you take my troll attempts seriously :lol:
You're a bleeding heart liberal, of course I took you seriously
User avatar
Lillaahiya
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 9782
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:35 am

Re: Poor poor

Post by Lillaahiya »

I'm pretty conservative in some aspects :MJ:
User avatar
Methylamine
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 6362
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:22 pm

Re: Poor poor

Post by Methylamine »

:blessed:
Niya
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2955
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2001 7:00 pm
Location: At the end of the tunnel, waiting for the light to come on.

Re: Poor poor

Post by Niya »

Some developers are starting the same trend in NYC, not only having different doors for those who are getting the low rent units, but the amenities are being limited. Residents are being refused to use the gyms, rooftop pools etc, Poorer residents are even being denied the option to pay extra for such amenities. The developers are exploiting a loophole in the contract they have with the government. Developers are getting big time tax break on property and real estate taxes in exchange of securing X number of affordable units for city residents. Now the local government is scrambling to close the loophole. Some developers want to have their cake and eat it. Well there are strings attached to using public funds and developers should know better.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “General - General Discussions”