Your obsession with "Wahabis" is endless. You don't play Allah's name the way you're doing. If you're referring to the teachings of Mohamed Ibn Abdu-Wahab, they follow the Ahmed Hanbali School of Thought in Sunni Islam.Lamagoodle wrote:
Gerigoor; I think as a somali you should stay neutral; it seems that you have read alot of wahabi literature bro. This is a conflict of not only religion but ethnicity. We do not know whether it is shiasim that is correct or sunnism. Read the old literature. I am not a shia but I am not convinced of sunni arguments (seems like arab arguments)
If you ask me about the early divisions of Islam between Mu'awiya (ra) and Ali (ra) and Hussein (ra), based on my information, I would have been with Ali (ra). However, Rafida Shia are same people who killed Ali (ra) and and betrayed Hussein (ra). Their claim of following Khalif Ali (ra) and Hussein (ra) is bogus and has no basis. Abdalla Ibn Saba is the man who engineered in their whole game. Throughout their history, they betrayed Islam. When Mongols ransacked Baghdad and other Muslim cities and towns, and turned the water of the river of Euphrates and Tigris into red and black, they (Rafida Shia) made an alliance with them. When the Spanish Inquisition was massacring the Muslims in Andulus and Iberia, the Fatimid Shia did not lift a finger. When crusaders wreck havoc on Jerusalem, the Rafida Shia did not lift a finger. This is the reason Salahudin Al-Ayubi first declared a war on them (Fatimids) before he took on the crusaders. Fyi, the Temple Knights are descendants of the current Freemasonry. I am not sure if you're a Freemason Lama, but I see signs. I hope I am wrong.
P.S: I am Sunni and follow the Hanafi School of Thought.