Sayid Abdulle Xassan vs. Cali-dhuux

[Sir-Luggoyo]

Dhuusaaye,

Have I asked your permission when I am taking jibes at other qabiils?

[dhuusa_deer]

[quote="Sir-Luggoyo"]Dhuusaaye,

Have I asked your permission when I am taking jibes at other qabiils?[/quote]

No, cause I don't need ur permission. Answer the goddamn question or forfiet your right to bash other qabiils unchallenged.

[Sir-Luggoyo]

So far you have proved your irrelevance hooyadaa indhaha kala jeeda ka wase

[dhuusa_deer]

[quote="Sir-Luggoyo"]So far you have proved your irrelevance hooyadaa indhaha kala jeeda ka wase[/quote]

I haven't 'proved' anything...you don't know what 'prove' entails, shut up.

Your insults are more feathers in my cap.

Answer the question...WHAT IS YOUR QABIIL?

HAWIYE? ISAAQ? DIR? OR DAROOD?

[Abdi Garissa]

[quote="xoogSADE14"]no one wants to read this

no isaaqs

no dameers (hawiyes)

long live gobta Ogaadeen [/quote]

Enough said ina saade

[Libaax*]

logooye

"Second Hand Atheist"




thats right my brother, thats the name everyone should be using on this dog, why he may ask well because it fits him down to a T

[Mataan_Ciideed]

Xoogsade!.

CaliDhuux nin CaliGari oo Dhulbahante buu ahaa!. CaliDhuux was a Darwiish Mujaahid himself, but he broke ranks with the Daraawiish, when he saw that many Dhulbahante ( specially his CaliGari ) were perishing in the fight against the infidels!. Basically, his point was, that if our neighbors won't fight against the infidels, then we shouldn't fight either!.

Even though CaliDhuux was anti Darwiish ( he never fought for the british though ), I still admire the dude and consider him one of my role models!.

Libaax

Aren't you ashamed of your grandfathers lap dancing for the kufri?!.

[dhuusa_deer]

[quote="Libaax*"]

thats right my brother, thats the name everyone should be using on this dog, why he may ask well because it fits him down to a T [/quote]

booooooooooooby, I own YOU//////////////SPANK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Gamadid.]

Hey Luggooyo Come on bro, the respect you had for me wasn't that deep then if you were going to change your mind about me that easy. Just wanted to make the conversation even handed in case some Mooryaan wanted to get at you, they should know your tribe as well

I am above and beyond the triviality of tribalism. I in fact find it funny when tribalists get riled up by just knowing I am from a tribe they don't like


Anyhow, saxib, I like you, you are true somali and muslim importantly. That is more important than your grand-grand-father may Allah have mercy on him.

[Cawar]

IF Sayidka was here today he would be the best rapper, esp. when he is talking abt himself...dont you think???

Chechk these words out:

Rasuulkii udgoonaana waa ina-adeerkay e (csws)
Sayidkii Axmed ahaana way awow runna ahee
Ibraahiin Rashiid aabbahay odaygii weeyaane

Asaxaabihii oo dhan baan ehel wadaagnaaye....


Seriously the guy is a leggend no matter what anyone says about him, and for me his intensions and his means justified the end...

[Ducaale004]

[quote="Sir-Luggoyo"][quote="Gamadid."]

Ducaale,

Nicely put saxib, nationalism is something alien to Mad Mac and his ilk but suffice to say, the movements for indepency were the Sayid's legacy and we finally achieved our goal thanx to him[/quote]


Thanks to him.

[gobdoon]

How can RASULKI UDGONA be his causin or is he claiming to be an Arab,or is he implying that he is Darod and that Darod descended from the Arabs,the ather thing I noticed is has he got some similarities with ADOLF HITLER,was he after a super race since he condemned all nationalities in cluding the Arabs,Why some people are quoting some GABAY without compliting or giving the relay given by another GABYA are they picking and choosing,We must agree with one thing the Sayid was a freedom fighter.

[Steeler [Crawler2]]

Lug
Yeah, Somali nationalism sure has prevailed. Yes indeed. Look at that nationalist paradise today. Nothing gets by you.

Ducaale
You are oversimplifying it. In fact the US has bent over backwards to accomodate the Sunnis in the process. But the Sunnis were dominant before our invasion, and they resent not being dominant anymore. Of course, they were dominant through the use of forced. Now the Kurds and Shi'ites are getting a vote, and the Sunnis don't like it. Also, psycho Sunnis from other lands that are anxious to attack Americans are aggressively keeping the conflict going. Where your analysis falls short is you refuse to accept that if the US pulls out of Iraq prematurely, civil war will ensue. You also conveniently ignore the fact that after the old Mullahs demise, he British rule in Somaliland continued comfortably for more than three decades AND the Somalilanders have maintained many customs from that culture that they were ostensibly so contemptuous of.

[DONKEYMAN]

NICE THREAD

[RIIGHAYE]

[quote="Ducaale004"]MAD MAC Do you have a proof that he killed women and children? The only legitimate claim I would agree with you Is that the dervishes raided lackey tribes who were facilitating the means to be hunted down. It is extremely justifiable that they were punished because whoever helps your enemy is your enemy. The tremendous support of their belief system, picturing themselves (Dervish movement)and their land as under a constant threat from an external society whom they held with contempt, gave them enough reason to justify their actions religiously. The British outperformed him by having other nations come to their aid and treating the local clans with elitist approach, a method that requires some measure of responsiveness to popular support. The subordinates (lackey clans) , unaware of the conscious undertaking of Sayid Mohamed to integrate our Somali lands, ceded their land to the British except Warsangeli clan in return for financial security. However, these tactics were only a check on the expansion of British Empire.

On the other hand, America is using the same tactics in Iraq by assisting the Shiite, a proposed majority in Iraq, overcome the Sunni dominancy. In fact, the tensions involved in the sectarian division are actually hurting America strategically finish the job as planned. It may even lead to consequences such as immediate withdrawal or prolonged military engagement, anarchy, and many possible worse scenarios saxib. Infringement of people'™s rights to land and self-determination always ensures defeat and I bet you that no matter how long America plans to stay in Iraq or increase the size of its military presence, the outcome will always be the same unless you let them (the occupied Iraqis) decide their own future and country.[/quote]


Yes I have a proof he killed women and children. He killed 300 women and children one day in LaasQorey. How could you overlook that horrible incident in 1912?