I am not a sufi nor do i belong to a sufi tariqa.gegiroor wrote: I think Gurey and FAH are Sufis, who think every opposition group in Syria is backed by the west. They hardly see the treachery of Rafida Iran and basically oblivion to the alliance between Rafida and the West in their effort to subdue the Ahlul-Sunna forces in Shaam and Iraq.
The rest of the gang have no clue what they're talking about. Some of them are pork-eating Zionists who basically hate every Sunni Muslim group out there.
GrumpyGeeljire and GrandpaKhalif are familiar with is happening there. Lo'Doon is also good. There are other who I don't remember. You can ignore the rest.
I am flattered though because to be a sufi, it means that one has reached a high level of spiritual development.
But i understand from your point of view, anyone that accepts tassawuf a normal part of islam and does not follow your Salafist/Wahabi ideology they must be one of those bid'ah practicing dancing and grave worshiping sufis.
The truth is that i am a traditional muslim, i believe in what our forefathers believed, my aqeeda is the same as it was 1000 years ago while your theology is brand new.
Infact i do not consider you to be ahlu sunna wa jamaaca as well, to me your are the same as a 12ver shiica and an ismaciili.
As for the war in Syria and Iraq, i will be against the agenda of isreal and the colonialists all the time.
This whole war is for their benefit, and theirs alone.
I dont think that all insurgent groups are supported by the west, no they are just tolerated because they are working and fighting towards the same goals, knowingly or unkowingly.
Do you seriously thing the hundreds of million worth of arms are appearing magically in their hands?
Do you seriously believe that the west is unaware of Saudis and other gulf states providing funds?
Everything they do is sanctioned,
You can argue why does NATO bomb some groups, and why are they supposedly at war with ISIS in Iraq?
This is just shepherding the herd and a little culling here and there to maintain control.
Those groups that focus 100% on fighting the Syrian Arab Army are left alone and even attempts are made to protect them from Syrian airforce and the Russians.
ISIS in Iraq has outlived its usefullness and they will be gone, i said a few months ago that the US will dismantle ISIS and create new "sunni" groups that will contest raqqa and the eastern border of Syria to create a US controlled "sunni" encalve.
They are doing this right now.
The Shia millitias in Iraq are being used by the US and will be discarded when they are no longer useful.
There have been "accidental" US airstrikes on Shia millitias in Iraq in the past, i am sure their frequency will increase in the future.
Meanwhile IRan will continue to train large groups of shia millitias to take advantage of any future US missteps.
As for Evil treacherous Shia IRan, Whats so evil about it? its simply serving its own interests.
Whats wrong with that?
At least Iran and the Shia are aware of and are capable of taking care of their strategic interests,
while Sunnis have no compass, and are fighting and dying for the west.
Ask yourself this.
If Assad falls and Damascus and allepo are overun, will the several dozen groups create a government?
Or will they fight each other.
What will they do when the Tap is cut off from the gulf?
You will have decades long civil war like somalia, until the rebel groups run out of weapons and manpower, then you will have an attempt at NATO/UN peacekeeping force.
In the meantime ISreal will annex the houran and the rest of Golan with its Assimilatable Druze population, excellent farmland and potentially huge gas reserves.
This is what Jabhat al Nusra and all the others are fighting and dying for.
The alternative is a peacefull resolution, which the US is blocking.