Do you accept Qurayshi superiority?

[Cumar-Labasuul]

You just showed in this thread that you are a Darood supremacist and are hiding behind the religion to back up your opinions. You are like the jahiliya arabs thats why you could be in serious trouble so ask repentance immediately.

[Al-Haqq]

You just showed in this thread that you are a Darood supremacist and are hiding behind the religion to back up your opinions. You are like the jahiliya arabs thats why you could be in serious trouble so ask repentance immediately.

I don't advocate supremacy of anybody over anybody else.

I'm merely stating I and my people as Quraysh have been istafa (made the best of) by Allah and possess virtues not found in others.

Nothing wrong with that.

[surrender]

in all seriousness al haq conclude what is that you excatly trying say, are you stating that arabs are superior than other race because religion came to them first? or bani hashim are 'superior' than other tribes bcause they were decendent of a prophet.?

[Arsenal_Man]

quraysh is not superior, we all the same.

except darood

[Grant]

[quote="Al-Haqq Tell him he's wasting his time.

Read Ibn Taymiyyah Expounds On Islam and you've learned more than you will if you spend 100 years in those courses.

My knowledge in Islamic Jurisprudence is off the charts.[/quote]

Now we're getting somewhere!

Ibn Taymiyya = the creator of fitna and the father of the Najdian shirksters. Your suggestion that 25% of today's Muslims join you in this Takfiir is almost certainly excessive. You got oil vapor in your eyes or bufis in your head?

Are you saying the Ottomans were illigitimate because they were not Qurayshi? Or because they were Suufi?
Or because they couldn't defeat the Portuguese and the Habash?
Or because the Saud/Wahaabbi clan defeated the Sariif of Mecca and drove the Turks out of the Arabian peninsula?

[Al-Haqq]

Tell him he's wasting his time.

Read Ibn Taymiyyah Expounds On Islam and you've learned more than you will if you spend 100 years in those courses.

My knowledge in Islamic Jurisprudence is off the charts.

Who he?

No, I won't tell her anything. Insha-allah she will be an aalimah!

Oh dear, what happened to humility. Nonetheless, masha-allah.

Nobody takes females scholars seriously, but it's her choice

[Grant]

[quote="Al-Haqq Tell him he's wasting his time.

Read Ibn Taymiyyah Expounds On Islam and you've learned more than you will if you spend 100 years in those courses.

My knowledge in Islamic Jurisprudence is off the charts.

Now we're getting somewhere!

Ibn Taymiyya = the creator of fitna and the father of the Najdian shirksters. Your suggestion that 25% of today's Muslims join you in this Takfiir is almost certainly excessive. You got oil vapor in your eyes or bufis in your head?

Are you saying the Ottomans were illigitimate because they were not Qurayshi? Or because they were Suufi?
Or because they couldn't defeat the Portuguese and the Habash?
Or because the Saud/Wahaabbi clan defeated the Sariif of Mecca and drove the Turks out of the Arabian peninsula?

[/quote]


Bump Cat got your tongue and fingers?

[Al-Haqq]

Ibn Taymiyya = the creator of fitna and the father of the Najdian shirksters. Your suggestion that 25% of today's Muslims join you in this Takfiir is almost certainly excessive. You got oil vapor in your eyes or bufis in your head?

Are you saying the Ottomans were illigitimate because they were not Qurayshi? Or because they were Suufi?
Or because they couldn't defeat the Portuguese and the Habash?
Or because the Saud/Wahaabbi clan defeated the Sariif of Mecca and drove the Turks out of the Arabian peninsula?

I don't want to waste my time running mental rings around an old man, to be frank, but the Ottomans were illegitimate because of their policies and terrible leadership of the Khilafah, the scholars agree that once a Caliph is established, we must follow them, even if they are not Quraysh, it's a prerequisite.

Your childish comments regarding Shaykh al-Islam do not befit somebody of your age.

[Kolombo]

Abu Jahl & Abi Lahab were not only Quraish, but were the Prophet's close uncles. What did the Prophet (saw) say regarding their fate and about Islamizing his own kin? That they were the most difficult people to ever embrace Islam. Al-Haq/TheNomad is talking shit as usual. Piety in Islam is based on a person's responsibility & actions, not some lineage. Most Quraish turned against the early Muslims and drove them out of Mecca.

[Al-Haqq]

Abu Jahl & Abi Lahab were not only Quraish, but were the Prophet's close uncles. What did the Prophet (saw) say regarding their fate and about Islamizing his own kin? That they were the most difficult people to ever embrace Islam. Al-Haq/TheNomad is talking shit as usual. Piety in Islam is based on a person's responsibility & actions, not some lineage. Most Quraish turned against the early Muslims and drove them out of Mecca.

Already been addressed.

Non-Arabs can be superior to Quraysh, but they are exceptions to the rule.

The Nabi was sent to them for a reason, this is unanimously agreed upon, it's because there is merit to their lineage.

[Somaliweyn]

First it was:

All men are created equal.


And pig.s like Al-Haq turn it into:

''All men are equal but some men are more equal''

[Grant]

[quote="Al-Haqq
[/quote]

I don't want to waste my time running mental rings around an old man, to be frank, but the Ottomans were illegitimate because of their policies and terrible leadership of the Khilafah, the scholars agree that once a Caliph is established, we must follow them, even if they are not Quraysh, it's a prerequisite.

Your childish comments regarding Shaykh al-Islam do not befit somebody of your age.[/quote]

Is there an inconsistancy in there somewhere, maybe having to do with the Wahaabbi bidca? So much for substance......

[Al-Haqq]

First it was:

All men are created equal.


And pig.s like Al-Haq turn it into:

''All men are equal but some men are more equal''

Quraysh superiority has been an integral part of our Aqeedah for 1400 years. Why change it now?

It's because people like you are racist. That's why you refuse to acknowledge Quraysh's inherent superiority.

[Al-Haqq]

Is there an inconsistancy in there somewhere, maybe having to do with the Wahaabbi bidca? So much for substance......

I accept your tacit concession

[Arsenal_Man]

This guy must be joking, or hes f-king retarded.