really? You imply that religions at their core are extremism. And of course force is permitted in our religion but its to be used against oppression, tyranny, etc. Not for killing innocent people to send a message to a supposed enemy. There are rules laid out in the Qur'an and Sunnah of the Prophet. The main thing is, in Islam, these are set in stone but in many places around the world there scholars who are paid off to create ludicrous fatwas. Liars and hypocrites running the show at every turn.AbdiJohnson wrote:FAH
Atheist tyrants killed in the name of their ideologies like communism and for power and not in the name of atheism whereas religious extremists from any faiths kill in the name of their religion. Of course religions don't generally call for violence but religion is left to interpretation and that is what makes them violent. Religions should be held responsible for attracting extremism. Those religious extremists got the idea from the religion itself to do these acts, through their own interpretation. This is why religion should bear the full faults. For instance, I know alcohol is banned in AA meetings so I know I won't bring it in Alcoholics Anonymous premises. There is no room for interpretation there. Its set in stone. Things are not set in stone in religion a lot of the time.
I am,
Abdi "They have flaws" Johnson
And what's funny is these Islamist groups in the East are just as Western as you and me in terms of political thinking.
The problem lies in people. People are horrible. People who have no religion turn to something else that they hold to a holy esteem. Alcohol as you mentioned is something that is literally worshipped here.