SomaliNet Forums

Negritude wrote:Why won't the mods ban this caps abusing nutcase?

Didn't I expose you for being an idiot Everything I wrote is the truth,
write a rebuttal if you feel i am wrong! This is a thread about somali dna and phenotypes

and you are beneath me 'nigger'



now

begone.

CushiticReflections wrote:@DonCorleone
Thanks. I try to spread the word to other Somalis when they falsely claim we are Arabs. I think that the truth is always enlightening and whether it is positive or negative we should accept it. But what I can't understand is why Somalis seem to want to believe that Arabs are superior and that they are blessed with some Arab ancestry when the reality is we're very homogeneous, unmixed, ancient, and have a much older and prouder history (excluding polytheism/idolism, if some did follow such beliefs).

I agree! The arab ancestry is fake! Somalis are pure! And we have a great ancient history! But now somalis and thinking we have bantu ancestry or something, this i guess is the next step of false claiming lol but all false claming is wrong and denotes weakness and shame!

abdi.ismail wrote:Wikipedia isn't a valid source. Anyone can write whatever they want.

BTW, the 'macrobians' see called Ethiopians by Herodotus.

true

I do think Somalia needs archeologists though, a lot of hidden treasure just waiting to be discovered.

true!

He called them "Macrobian Ethiopians" - rather than simply Ethiopians. The word "Ethiopian" was a European term that meant "black" and was used in various points in history to refer to all blacks and/or people of the Horn of Africa. Herodotus' map in his book clearly shows that Macrobia is separate from Ethiopia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Herod ... map-en.svg

Ethiopia is a greek word,
ethio meaning black or burnt,
the IA at the end means land of,
so basically land of the blacks....

In fact, the area he placed Macrobia appears to be in Somaliweyn.

That is true about Wikipedia, which is why I provided other sources confirming that information. The information I posted from the site came from multiple other sources that Wikipedia provided the citations for and which I included. So, if you'd like, you can read those books and articles that followed the Wikipedia link that contained the same information.

haters are gonna hate bro, they can't handle the truth!

I agree that Somalia need archeologists. We have an undeciphered ancient script that are in caves that contain prehistoric drawings. It would certainly reveal a lot of the "prehistoric" world (ie. world before written history) if they were deciphered. It would also reveal a lot about us as a people.

AGREE 10000000% SOMALIA HAS TONS OF HISTORY,
BUT WE HAVE TO BEWARE THE LAST TIME, BRITISH STOLE MANY ARTIFACTS! HOPEFULLY HSM WILL GET THEM BACK!

@DonCoreolone
It's nice to have an ally in truth.

Negritude wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herodotus#Reliability

IJS

If you read that section, it deals with doubts about his reliability when discussing Egypt. Macrobia is not Egypt. Therefore, that does not support any assertion of the invalidation of his description of Macrobians. The looks, actions, and location of the Macrobians all support the identity of these peoples as being Somalis. In other words, they sound like Somalis, look like Somalis, spoke like Somalis. They were also nomads like Somalis who lived in an arid land. They were a people who valued cleverness and what seems like riddles, just as Somalis traditionally do. They ate like Somalis (meat and milk). Unless you can find a source specifying that Herodotus' accounts on Macrobians are proven untrue by evidence, then the information I've provided is incorrect. But there is no such source. And the sources that do question his credibility focus on his information on Egyptians.

In addition, a lot of the information I've provided is not on Macrobians but on the Land of Punt and other things. I think they should be of interest to us.

DonCorleone wrote:

Negritude wrote:Why won't the mods ban this caps abusing nutcase?

Didn't I expose you for being an idiot Everything I wrote is the truth,
write a rebuttal if you feel i am wrong! This is a thread about somali dna and phenotypes

and you are beneath me 'nigger'



now

begone.

No more naysayers? Well, I'll be darned, I think we scared them away with the facts.

CushiticReflections wrote:

DonCorleone wrote:

Negritude wrote:Why won't the mods ban this caps abusing nutcase?

Didn't I expose you for being an idiot Everything I wrote is the truth,
write a rebuttal if you feel i am wrong! This is a thread about somali dna and phenotypes

and you are beneath me 'nigger'



now

begone.

No more naysayers? Well, I'll be darned, I think we scared them away with the facts.

Or, some would prefer to leave worthless racist scum to rot at their own devices.

Negritude wrote:

CushiticReflections wrote:


No more naysayers? Well, I'll be darned, I think we scared them away with the facts.

Or, some would prefer to leave worthless racist scum to rot at their own devices.

In what ways are we "racist"? Also, considering you've not, even once, provided reasonable evidence to support any statements contrary to the evidences we've provided, I'd dare say that your silence is proof that you are unable to provide valid rebuttals.

CushiticReflections wrote:

Negritude wrote:
Or, some would prefer to leave worthless racist scum to rot at their own devices.

In what ways are we "racist"? Also, considering you've not, even once, provided reasonable evidence to support any statements contrary to the evidences we've provided, I'd dare say that your silence is proof that you are unable to provide valid rebuttals.

Lol @ repeatedly referring to yourselves as we. Birds of a worthless feather flock together, I see.

Truth be told, I have only ever had the misfortune of unintentionally skimming your poorly written, unreliably sourced essays... when my right hand has its lazy moments and cannot scroll past with adequate speed. Though clearly you inflate the importance and will find that difficult to believe. I could not care less if the content is factual or false. Why? Because I enter this thread only to reiterate my contempt for its most active participants. I would have thought that was self-explanatory at this point, but snet never fails to lower the standards of human capability. Do you 'dare' to comprehend?

I was condemning the racist sentiment that the OP, whom I was addressing (hint hint), has continuously expressed in a way that implies insanity, instability and a broken caps key. In other words, the racist nutcase's post history is the only thing I have noted, as it is a unique kind of crazy that till now I had hoped did not exist. I haven't given you much notice beyond my assumption that you and this character agree to some degree, an assumption you confirmed by your insistence to associate with it.

This is the last I address you, your KKK-inclined toy boy, and this thread. Good day.

Negritude wrote:

CushiticReflections wrote:In what ways are we "racist"? Also, considering you've not, even once, provided reasonable evidence to support any statements contrary to the evidences we've provided, I'd dare say that your silence is proof that you are unable to provide valid rebuttals.

Truth be told, I have only ever had the misfortune of unintentionally skimming your poorly written, unreliably sourced essays... when my right hand has its lazy moments and cannot scroll past with adequate speed. Though clearly you inflate the importance and will find that difficult to believe. I could not care less if the content is factual or false. Why? Because I enter this thread only to reiterate my contempt for its most active participants.

I've provided many sources outside of Wikipedia which include articles and books based on the findings of scientists and historians. You have not provided valid and sourced information that may invalidate all that I've posted nor anything that would question their relevance and use in clarifying the history and background of Somalis. Therefore, your referral to those sources as "unreliable" is simply an opinion. Also, I did not write essays, which would have a specific form. I simply just wrote information, I won't bother typing up essays in its specific format and citing the sources as one would in an essay.

Negritude wrote:Lol @ repeatedly referring to yourselves as we. Birds of a worthless feather flock together, I see. I would have thought that was self-explanatory at this point, but snet never fails to lower the standards of human capability. Do you 'dare' to comprehend?

Your attacks on the characters of those who dare question or disagree with you are humourous at best. You did not specified who the "worthless scum" was and your use of "their devices" indicates that there may more than one individual who you directed your disparaging comment towards. Therefore, it is a more than reasonable assumption that you may have directed that towards any person(s) who disagreed with you, particularly considering the timing of your comment (which was posted after my post). I do not associate "comprehension" (ie. understanding) with keeping up with the disputes and drama between users on snet. Such knowledge of trivial drama should not be the measurement of "human capability" or of "comprehension".

Negritude wrote:This is the last I address you, your KKK-inclined toy boy, and this thread. Good day.

Another ad hominem. The use of insults towards person(s) you disagree with do not strengthen one's argument. Regardless, may Peace be with you.

BUMP
NO ONE TOOK MY CHALLENGE
I Want to see if ANY SOMALI CAN CREATE THE 'SOMALI RACE/PHENOTYPE' BY MIXING TWO RACES TOGETHER

YOU CANNOT USE AETHOPID,TUTSI,OR SAHARID/SAHELID

TO ALL THE PEOPLE SAYING SOMALIS ARE A MIX OF TWO RACES

PROVE IT NOW
http://www.humanphenotypes.com/mixer.html

DonCorleone wrote:BUMP
NO ONE TOOK MY CHALLENGE
I Want to see if ANY SOMALI CAN CREATE THE 'SOMALI RACE/PHENOTYPE' BY MIXING TWO RACES TOGETHER

YOU CANNOT USE AETHOPID,TUTSI,OR SAHARID/SAHELID

TO ALL THE PEOPLE SAYING SOMALIS ARE A MIX OF TWO RACES

PROVE IT NOW
http://www.humanphenotypes.com/mixer.html

Somali= east aethopid+sudanid

Abdihaliim wrote: Somali= east aethopid+sudanid

East Aethopids are Somalis. So of course a Somali with someone with similar features to a Somali (ie. Ethiopian, Eritrean, Beja people, Nubians, etc) might produce children who look Somali.

CushiticReflections wrote:

Abdihaliim wrote: Somali= east aethopid+sudanid

East Aethopids are Somalis. So of course a Somali with someone with similar features to a Somali (ie. Ethiopian, Eritrean, Beja people, Nubians, etc) might produce children who look Somali.

Okay, maybe this is the reason, why we look different, than our west African brothers. They breeded with african archaic
Somalis do not have that archaic

""[The skull] has got a much more primitive appearance, even though it is only 13,000 years old," said Chris Stringer, from London's Natural History Museum, who was part of the team of researchers.

"This suggests that human evolution in Africa was more complex... the transition to modern humans was not a straight transition and then a cut off."

Prof Stringer thinks that ancient humans did not die away once they had given rise to modern humans"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14947363

Abdihalim, change your name since you believe in evolution. It doesn't suit you. What an insult to come from filthy west Africans, I'm banu adam not banu f-king ugly wide nosed monkey ape from Nigeria.

They are not 'our brothers' either, they don't f-king look like you, how can they be related to you? You're so silly.

hydrogen wrote:Abdihalim, change your name since you believe in evolution. It doesn't suit you. What an insult to come from filthy west Africans, I'm banu adam not banu f-king ugly wide nosed monkey ape from Nigeria.

They are not 'our brothers' either, they don't f-king look like you, how can they be related to you? You're so silly.

You insult the features of fellow descendants of Adam, whom you somehow claim to believe in, and you have the nerve to determine the beliefs of others.

Hypocrisy and arrogance are a funny pair, seldom separated.

Negritude wrote:
You insult the features of fellow descendants of Adam, whom you somehow claim to believe in, and you have the nerve to determine the beliefs of others.

Hypocrisy and arrogance are a funny pair, seldom separated.

Banu Adam -> Banu Noah (broke into several people). Somalis happened to come from a different child of Noah to west Africans.