Sadeboi,
You keep coming up with the same distorted sources over and over again that has been proven to be false. Why do you think every-one who is neutral has called your lies just that-lies? Sxb, you are not making sense and every-one can see. Instead of down-playing the sacrifices the men of Lafoole and others made, why can't you find it in your heart to accept their contributions if you did not have so much hatred? Especially when history praises them and accepts them as heroes?
Lafoole 1896: ''Axad Shiiki''
Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators
Forum rules
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
- Twisted_Logic
- SomaliNet Super
- Posts: 12897
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:09 pm
- Location: Speaking up against Somalinet's tolerance for Al Qaida Loyalists
Re: Lafoole 1896: ''Axad Shiiki''
So, I take that as no, right?
- Twisted_Logic
- SomaliNet Super
- Posts: 12897
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:09 pm
- Location: Speaking up against Somalinet's tolerance for Al Qaida Loyalists
Re: Lafoole 1896: ''Axad Shiiki''
[quote="sadeboi"]So, I take that as no, right?[/quote]
You should let the other members to be a judge right? You don't have to look beyond SW's last post to see how your myths have been busted. Why should you keep coming up with the same recycles crap time and again, if you did not have such a lousy case? History can't be re-written that easily. It is a complex sbuject contrary to what self-appointed historians like yourself think. You should pray that we are not having this conversation among real intellectuals. You whole argument is laughable
You should let the other members to be a judge right? You don't have to look beyond SW's last post to see how your myths have been busted. Why should you keep coming up with the same recycles crap time and again, if you did not have such a lousy case? History can't be re-written that easily. It is a complex sbuject contrary to what self-appointed historians like yourself think. You should pray that we are not having this conversation among real intellectuals. You whole argument is laughable
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 300 Views
-
Last post by Advo
-
- 2 Replies
- 592 Views
-
Last post by eyes-only
-
- 0 Replies
- 345 Views
-
Last post by Meheri Man
-
- 6 Replies
- 832 Views
-
Last post by Xabashooow
-
- 2 Replies
- 340 Views
-
Last post by Somaliweyn
-
- 8 Replies
- 49 Views
-
Last post by Knight of Wisdom
-
- 14 Replies
- 1323 Views
-
Last post by UlteriorMotive
-
- 0 Replies
- 615 Views
-
Last post by Conqueror
-
- 9 Replies
- 1222 Views
-
Last post by X.Playa