Union soo gal

[ToughGong]

The full title of his book was;

The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life,

It gave the moral green light for the exploitation of the Black man

[union]

Wasn't Charles Darwin the same guy who made the book "The God delusion" what a person to praise eh union.

That would be Richard Dawkins. Charles Darwin died over a century ago.

[ToughGong]

Wasn't Charles Darwin the same guy who made the book "The God delusion" what a person to praise eh union.

Same horse different jockey

[union]

The full title of his book was;

The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life,

It gave the moral green light for the exploitation of the Black man

Like I said earlier, Dawrin was a product of his time. And in 19th century Europe, there was a lot of prejudice against the blackman. Nonetheless, his theory on evolution (which actually brings humanity together) has not been dis proven and attempts to attack his character won't change that.

[The_Patriot]

Patriot, I pity your lamentable ignorance. It's clear that you haven't been taught evolution, and you probably think it says we "evolved from monkeys" and other nonsense. I suggest you enroll in the local community college and take biology 101.

Apparently you're also unable to come to terms with the scientific method, which has taken Darwin's hypothesis and had it tested by scientists of all walks of life. No longer can you deny evolution on the grounds of science, and in science personal opinions matter little.

dude you are more ignorant than me you want me to ditch the creation story for the evolution hypothesis? come on

dude I know the entire evolution thing for every one truth in it there are 99 lies packaged with it that makes it 100.

[ArcadeFire]

Wasn't Charles Darwin the same guy who made the book "The God delusion" what a person to praise eh union.

That would be Richard Dawkins. Charles Darwin died over a century ago.

[ToughGong]

his theory on evolution (which actually brings humanity together)

[union]

union is a damn kafir..stop arguing with this lowlife and get on with your lifes guys.

Are you calling for a tactical retreat?

In the previous thread I schooled you on the basics of evolution, so now you know better then to open your mouth and appear a fool.

[The_Patriot]

The full title of his book was;

The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life,

It gave the moral green light for the exploitation of the Black man

Like I said earlier, Dawrin was a product of his time. And in 19th century Europe, there was a lot of prejudice against the blackman. Nonetheless, his theory on evolution (which actually brings humanity together) has not been dis proven and attempts to attack his character won't change that.

has not been proven kulaha niga the natural selection has been used by the Aryans to propagate hatred it was sympathetic to colonialism and as well as fuelling the WW2
where hitler saw that the Ariyan were the superior race.

I mean the survival for the fittest what a bullshit dogma.

[Shirib]

It's outrageous because it doesn't match up with the evidence. All the evidence points to evolution over time, and not a sudden creation. 98% of our genome is the same as those of the apes, are they made from clay too?

And like I said, I believe in the virgin birth because I believe that God, on occasion, intervenes in the natural world in miraculous ways. And then you're probably wondering, why do you take one to be only symbolic, and the other one literal? Well because virgin birth is plausible, creation out of clay isn't. Also, how are you so sure that literal interputations of the Qu'ran are so essential?

Virgin birth of a human is not possible at all, what so ever. It is a miracle from God, much like that of Adam. If God can do one, I don't understand why it is hard to believe in the other.

The reason I believe in the literal interpretation is because that is how scholars and everyone else has taken it. Once u start not believing in the literal interpretation of the Quran u start getting touchy and stop believing.

If u say Adam being made of clay is figurative, who is to say Mary a virgin giving birth to Jesus isn't figurative. Moses splitting the red sea isn't figurative. Heaven and hell are figurative. It opens a whole pandora's box. You take Gods words as he say's it. It is not for us to interpret and try to say what he meant.

[abdisamad3]

union is a damn kafir..stop arguing with this lowlife and get on with your lifes guys.

Are you calling for a tactical retreat?

In the previous thread I schooled you on the basics of evolution, so now you know better then to open your mouth and appear a fool.

you couldnt even answer my questions what did you school..you foolish little darwinist.

[union]

union is a damn kafir..stop arguing with this lowlife and get on with your lifes guys.

Are you calling for a tactical retreat?

In the previous thread I schooled you on the basics of evolution, so now you know better then to open your mouth and appear a fool.

you couldnt even answer my questions what did you school..you foolish little darwinist.

You can't tell such blatant lies when the forum records your every post.

union you do realise that evolution is something that is proven right that is why its just a theory,,,and if your such hardcore evolutionist then tell me what came first birds or the eggs..and why do we still have monkeys today if the monkeys in the past evolved to humans and why dont we see monkeys evolving to humans today,

Everything in science is called a theory. Only in math can you "prove" something to be true, but in science evidence is just collected until you reach such a point where a theory is accepted widely. We use gravitational theory to explain gravity, and if you consider that too to be just "a theory" then kindly jump out a 15th story window and see how that ends up. Furthermore, monkeys ARE still evolving. Evolution is a constant process that occurs over millions of years. I'm not sure if current monkeys will evolve into humans, as the process is hard to predict, but some of them (like your fine self) are certainly heading in the right direction.

Also, just to clear up a misconception which you appear to have: Humans DID NOT evolve from monkeys or apes. We are simply closely related to them because we shared a common ancestor in the distant past.

[grandpakhalif]

Wasn't Charles Darwin the same guy who made the book "The God delusion" what a person to praise eh union.

Same horse different jockey

Yeah I got mixed up because they both are diehard evolutionists, anywho Darwin suddenly became 'enlightened' just because he want to the Galapagos islands, none of his theory is scientific fact but mere speculation which is riddled with errors and anomalies.

[The_Patriot]

I guess by know some of the monkeys would have evolved into Homo habilis ?

I mean monkey > homo habilis>Hhomo erectus>homo sapiens>humans
why is this process not repeating itself?

[abdisamad3]

^^you call that schooling lol your even more foolish then I thought..