LIBERALS WANT TO LEGALIZE MARIJUANA!

[grandpakhalif]

Dr. Gurey Al Intellectual has arrived to slam the ignoramous with facts

[Shirib]

fighter,

what medical drug intoxicants are u speaking of, can you be more specific

[gurey25]

Thats very good shirib.

You should stay consistant.

I am just saying that 90% of people here are more bothered by weed than qaad or ciggerettes
and some even think alcohol is better than weed.

when the opposite is true.


Thats where the cultural issue comes in.

[union]

Keyblade:

You cannot compare the benefits of wine to those of marijuana. Drinking wine as a precautionary action against cancer is undoubtedly haram. Everybody would suddenly realize it's health benefits and use that to tip toe around the religious prohibition. But patients who use medical marijuana actually have illnesses that threaten their lives with excruciating pain, that other drugs have failed to alleviate. I agree with grandpa and fighter that they should be allowed to use marijuana on compassionate grounds.

[Shirib]

Keyblade:

You cannot compare the benefits of wine to those of marijuana. Drinking wine as a precautionary action against cancer is undoubtedly haram. Everybody would suddenly realize it's health benefits and use that to tip toe around the religious prohibition. But patients who use medical marijuana actually have illnesses that threaten their lives with excruciating pain, that other drugs have failed to alleviate. I agree with grandpa and fighter that they should be allowed to use marijuana on compassionate grounds.

what about mixing jinn and bacardi and getting drunk out their mind to the point that u could beat them with a bat and they wouldn't feel it. It alleviates the pain after all

[union]

Keyblade:

You cannot compare the benefits of wine to those of marijuana. Drinking wine as a precautionary action against cancer is undoubtedly haram. Everybody would suddenly realize it's health benefits and use that to tip toe around the religious prohibition. But patients who use medical marijuana actually have illnesses that threaten their lives with excruciating pain, that other drugs have failed to alleviate. I agree with grandpa and fighter that they should be allowed to use marijuana on compassionate grounds.

what about mixing jinn and bacardi and getting drunk out their mind to the point that u could beat them with a bat and they wouldn't feel it. It alleviates the pain after all

Your hypothetical method may work once or twice, but it's not a safe long term solution like medical marijuana nor does it have as much clinical research supporting its wide range of health benefits.

[Keyblade]

Keyblade,

The only hypocrisy is you accepting medical drugs (intoxicants in most cases) and then saying marijuana is haram.

That's the only hypocrisy that everyone can see and your inability (for obvious reasons) for not answering my question.

loooooool @ most drugs being intoxicants. so most drugs are hallucinogens? forget about that, all I said was (assume that I was a Scientologist when I said this) according to Islam (for which grandpa is a self-styled torchbearer of) its forbidden, which made his unwavering support for it amusing.

personally I don't have a problem with people smoking weed even recreationally...so there goes your strawman. for the last time I don't need to answer your question because my morals have absolutely no relevance to my pointing out of a double standard

[Keyblade]

Keyblade:

You cannot compare the benefits of wine to those of marijuana. Drinking wine as a precautionary action against cancer is undoubtedly haram. Everybody would suddenly realize it's health benefits and use that to tip toe around the religious prohibition. But patients who use medical marijuana actually have illnesses that threaten their lives with excruciating pain, that other drugs have failed to alleviate. I agree with grandpa and fighter that they should be allowed to use marijuana on compassionate grounds.

you're right, but when wine was brought up by Shirib the argument at the time was that weed was good to smoke for preventative purposes...so it was a fair comparison at the time. right now we're at 'smoking weed or not could be a matter of life and death' which is where y ou came in

[union]

Keyblade:

You cannot compare the benefits of wine to those of marijuana. Drinking wine as a precautionary action against cancer is undoubtedly haram. Everybody would suddenly realize it's health benefits and use that to tip toe around the religious prohibition. But patients who use medical marijuana actually have illnesses that threaten their lives with excruciating pain, that other drugs have failed to alleviate. I agree with grandpa and fighter that they should be allowed to use marijuana on compassionate grounds.

you're right, but when wine was brought up by Shirib the argument at the time was that weed was good to smoke for preventative purposes...so it was a fair comparison at the time. right now we're at 'smoking weed or not could be a matter of life and death' which is where y ou came in

lol, yea I disagree with using weed for preemptive reasons.
But I think there's a solid case in the affirmative for the current argument.

[Keyblade]

I don't have a problem with either argument...just the underlying motive causing the argument to keep morphing. its dishonest and hypocritical.

[fighter]

Shirib,

Are you serious? You need me to answer that? Many drugs "intoxicate" people; not at the exact same way as alcohol or weed, but they still intoxicate you. Intoxication has to do with altering the state of mind and change of behaviors. You need me to tell you a medical drug that does that? Well, one is Accutane. Perfect example. There are countless drugs that can make people violent and make people "unstable".

As for Keyblade,

There's no double standard. You are refusing to answer the question for obvious reasons and that's because you agree with me. You are just not being a man and accepting that at least once in your life, you are wrong. You are also not answering the question because you don't want to seem weak and want to flip-flop.

There's no shame in being wrong. You are human after all and humans make mistakes.

Do the right thing and answer the damn question ... So we can all see the answer to your question (which I. And Grandpa obviously know) but a few may not due to being brainwashed by your backwards views

[Keyblade]

[fighter]

Oh I'm very serious.

I use effective arguments and you bring up funny pictures to counter my arguments like you did 2 or 3 other times and you are trying so very hard to convince a few of the readers on here that you are right and I am wrong with funny pics?

You lose sir. Good day

[Keyblade]

personally I don't have a problem with people smoking weed even recreationally...so there goes your strawman. for the last time I don't need to answer your question because my morals have absolutely no relevance to my pointing out of a double standard

look man, if you've bothered to read anything other than the part in bold you'd have realized that i actually did answer your question. but what relevance does my moral stance have? have you ever heard of playing devil's advocate? you're finding it hard to understand that your question (which you place way too much importance on) is pointless because i may not even believe in the argument i'm making, but it's still a valid one as its purpose is simply to point out a double standard. so asking that question to bolster your argument is just redundant.

you're taking this too seriously, this isn't a 'zomg let's see who's right' competition so relax. convince readers? wtf, chill with the projection man.

[fighter]

personally I don't have a problem with people smoking weed even recreationally...so there goes your strawman. for the last time I don't need to answer your question because my morals have absolutely no relevance to my pointing out of a double standard

look man, if you've bothered to read anything other than the part in bold you'd have realized that i actually did answer your question. but what relevance does my moral stance have? have you ever heard of playing devil's advocate? you're finding it hard to understand that your question (which you place way too much importance on) is pointless because i may not even believe in the argument i'm making, but it's still a valid one as its purpose is simply to point out a double standard. so asking that question to bolster your argument is just redundant.

you're taking this too seriously, this isn't a 'zomg let's see who's right' competition so relax. convince readers? wtf, chill with the projection man.

You mad , you mad (camron voice)