SomaliNet Forums

LOL@MAp

Yemeni and omani are white

The US and the EU war against muslims is about a world domination. The rules of engagement would be different depending on the race of the Muslims. In the African front there is a sanctioned savagery techniques than is permissible in white Muslim fronts.

Evidence:

In the forward pages of US Army * Marine Corps Counterinsurgency Field Manual, General David Petraeus and L T General James Amos assert that the POPULATION SECURITY IS THE FIRST REQUIREMENT OF SUCCESS IN COUNTER INSURGENCY. Next " economic development, good governance, and the provision of essential services, all occurring within the matrix of effective information operation, muslt all improve simultenously and steadily over long period of time if America's determined insurgent enemies are to be defeated."

Here is the question:

Is Somalia part of the "war on terror" just like Afghanistan and Iraq? Or is it different?

The answer is yes, Somalia is "part of the war on terror" as general Petraeus forward pages assert.

Then why isn't population security a priority in Somalia?

Remember in Iraq Petraeus surge was to give population security. In Afghanistan, despite effective insurgency, the general population is not under attack.


What makes Somalia different?

Is it because of the race of Somali people?

How else can one explain a Leningrad Nazi style destruction of a population of entire city.

Amnesty said some 6,000 civilians were reported killed and more than 600,000 were forced to flee their homes in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, last year. "The people of Somalia are being killed, raped, tortured. Looting is widespread and entire neighborhoods are being destroyed," Michelle Kagari, Amnesty's deputy director for Africa, said in a statement from Nairobi that accompanied the report.




A Tukhachevsky doctrine? Destruction of the population

or

Peteaus' counterinsurgency doctrine? Population security




Another interesting question about Race and War:

Is this unique to Somalia or are there other historical precedents where the general objective of the invader remained the same but the methods of operation were different due to the race of the population?


Classic example: The Nazi invasion of Europe(1939-1945)


The objective of the Nazi Germany: World domination


Method of operation in "proper Europe": France, Holland, Scandenavian.

The Nazi's were more civil.


Mothed of operation in Slavik Europe: Russia, Yuguslavia.

The Nazi's were extremely brutal




NC.

Truth hurts,


I have posted the amnesty International report on the largest conservative website(white), and guess what?

Conservatives Forum.com The #1 Conservatives Forum on Google.com
Conservative's News and Discussion Forum. http://www.conservativesforum.com/
News Forum - The NCO Club - Military Forum - Elections & Candidates
Constitutional Issues - Conservative Sites - Talk Radio Conservative News Sources - ProudVet's Blog
Mitt Romney Forum - Political Polls - Sports - Health - Poetry - Entertainment - News Articles
Conservative's Forum

An Error Has Occurred!

Error: Banning Notification. Sorry, you are banned from using this forum!



The Sobs are like Somali clans. They don't want hear the other group.

''An Error Has Occurred!

Error: Banning Notification. Sorry, you are banned from using this forum! ''



They must have been shocked by the accurate comparison between the Nazi drive for world domination and its different method of approach to the different races and the current West drive for world domination.

Anyways, excellent analysis

I wasn't surprised a bit. I signed entire warning page of how I could be banned if I my conservative identity were suspected. I was on probation for two days until I dropped the Nazi analogy.


Fortunately now, me, the amnesty report and the Nazi analogy, we are all headed to deep south for more conservative showdown.

we will see what happens



NC