Shias attacking muslims in medina !

Daily chitchat.

Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators

Forum rules
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
melo
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2483
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:27 pm

Re: Shias attacking muslims in medina !

Post by melo »

HutuKing01 wrote:
melo wrote:They should be banned from visiting Madinah and the Kacbah. They already have their own Madinah- Karbala and their own Makkah- Najaf.
The extremist rafidha should be banned, but not the believers such as shias like Hassan Nasrallah or khamenei. They are better than the crazy madkhalis who are supporting apostates like mubarak and call him amir al mu'mineen.

Down with crazy madkhali(hippie wahabis) and jihadi salafis(khawaarij).
I believe that the believing shiica ie the masses should be allowed, but people like Hassan Nasrallah or Khamanei should not. Especially Hassan nasrallah, who was caught on camera insulting the saxaabah.

The madkhalis control sacuudi so good luck with that :lol:
User avatar
DR-YALAXOOW
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 13991
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:26 am

Re: Shias attacking muslims in medina !

Post by DR-YALAXOOW »

hassan nasrallah
Image

sheekh xassan narallah allaha ha xafidee oo xajka jooga maasha allah :up: :up: :rose:

Image
young the lion of islam
Image

hassan nasrallah waa ninka kaliya dunida islaamka ka guuleeystay powerfull isrealy army maasha allh.

30 days ayuu la dagaalamaayey dagaalka markuuu bilaabanaayey 5 km xuduuda isreal meel u jirta ka bilaawdey, dagaalka markuu dhamaanaayey 3 km xuduuuda isreal meel u jirta ayey ciidanka mujaahidiinta saxda geesiyaasha xisbu allah ay ka dagaalamaayeeen maasha allah.

isreal because of xasan nasrallah jabkiii uu u geeystay waxay biilaabeen inay dhamaan ciidankooda tababarkii ay siin jireen ay badalaan.

maasha allah. ciiidanka xisbu allah and xasan rasrallah yaa guuusha siiiyey??

ALLAH ayaa guusha siiyey maasha allah :rose: :up: :up: :up:
AhlulbaytSoldier
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 20301
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 4:50 am
Location: Persian Empire

Re: Shias attacking muslims in medina !

Post by AhlulbaytSoldier »

melo wrote:
HutuKing01 wrote:
melo wrote:They should be banned from visiting Madinah and the Kacbah. They already have their own Madinah- Karbala and their own Makkah- Najaf.
The extremist rafidha should be banned, but not the believers such as shias like Hassan Nasrallah or khamenei. They are better than the crazy madkhalis who are supporting apostates like mubarak and call him amir al mu'mineen.

Down with crazy madkhali(hippie wahabis) and jihadi salafis(khawaarij).
I believe that the believing shiica ie the masses should be allowed, but people like Hassan Nasrallah or Khamanei should not. Especially Hassan nasrallah, who was caught on camera insulting the saxaabah.

The madkhalis control sacuudi so good luck with that :lol:

You consider Abu Sufyan to be sahabi?
The guy entered islam to save his soul and he didnt want to leave makkah. I do not consider Hind nor abu sufyan to be sahaba. Except Muawiyah r.a, yet he failed later. but i wont hate them, only criticize.
During the small disagreement over who should be first caliph, sufyan told Ali r.a: abu bakr stole something which belongs to you, by Allah fight him i will support you with a great army.
Ali radiyallah anhu knew that Abu sufyan said that because he wanted the religion to be destroyed by civilwar.
zaahidun
Posts: 211
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:17 am

Re: Shias attacking muslims in medina !

Post by zaahidun »

HutuKing01 wrote:
You consider Abu Sufyan to be sahabi?
The guy entered islam to save his soul and he didnt want to leave makkah. I do not consider Hind nor abu sufyan to be sahaba. Except Muawiyah r.a, yet he failed later. but i wont hate them, only criticize.
During the small disagreement over who should be first caliph, sufyan told Ali r.a: abu bakr stole something which belongs to you, by Allah fight him i will support you with a great army.
Ali radiyallah anhu knew that Abu sufyan said that because he wanted the religion to be destroyed by civilwar.
warkaadan halkeed utiirineysaa siirada asxaabta wax sidaan oo kale kuma jiraane inteed ka keetay , hinda iyo abu sufyan allaha uwada naxariistee islaanimadooda sideed ku keentay inaad wax ka sheegto ,1: ka keen taariikhda saxaabada ama tan nabiga meel lagu dhaliilay 2daas saxaabi 2: saxaabada oo wax laga sheegaa sow ma ogid in lacnada alle ,malaaigta,dadka oo dhan eey kugu dhaceyso siduu rasuulka sheegay . duqa dont cross the line
User avatar
Dudaaye
SomaliNetizen
SomaliNetizen
Posts: 796
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:00 pm
Location: Goldogob Distirict: leelkase State

Re: Shias attacking muslims in medina !

Post by Dudaaye »

[youtube]LTKMOP13swg&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]

[youtube]8CYxa6icenI&feature=related[/youtube]

[youtube]_lbYrDCDeKc&feature=related[/youtube]
grandpakhalif
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 30687
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 10:32 am
Location: Darul Kufr
Contact:

Re: Shias attacking muslims in medina !

Post by grandpakhalif »

HutuKing you idiot Abu Sufyan(R.A) may allah bless him with paradise he died as a shahiid and he was sahaba. You dont know how much trouble Muahwiya caused for Hadrat Ali, he whipped up so much propaganda, so much tension this guy was the divider of the Ummah. He and the kharijites were the downfall of Hadrat ALi (RH) the great rightly guided calipha went through many tests because of Muawiyah and his lavish style he loved and wanted to sustan during his cousin Hadrat Othman's reign. Ali liked muslims to follow the tradition of Rasullah and not love this world but Muawiyah wanted to live like the Babylons in Syria. God bless Hadrat Ali(RH) ahe fought with his heart to stop Muawiyah and fought for Allah. I cant believe you side with Muawiyah and you hate his father Abu sufyan who was good muslim at the end. Muawiyah was big time qabilist he wanted Ummayad reign over the holy Banu Hashim reign and he know the Hashimites were more superior and holier than Ummayad even through they were humble.
User avatar
Shirib
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 26911
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:50 am
Location: May God grant us victory.

Re: Shias attacking muslims in medina !

Post by Shirib »

Shia's are Muslim, change your title
The_Patriot
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 20702
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:39 am

Re: Shias attacking muslims in medina !

Post by The_Patriot »

Voltage wrote:
DR-YALAXOOW wrote:WAHAABIS OWN FAKE PROPHET MAXAMED ABDULWAHAAB former british egent,
Abdulwahab was two centuries before the British came. Iska aamus ninyaho.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
DR-YALAXOOW
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 13991
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:26 am

Re: Shias attacking muslims in medina !

Post by DR-YALAXOOW »

Voltage wrote:
Abdulwahab was two centuries before the British came. Iska aamus ninyaho.

thats your ignorance WARYAAA, read the history of maxamed abdulwahaab and hes meetings of British spy named Hempher the early 1700s .





. Hempher, The British Spy To The Middle East or Confessions of a British Spy is a document purporting to be the account by an 18th century British agent, Hempher, of his instrumental role in founding the conservative Islamic reform movement of Wahhabism.



British spy named Hempher, working in the early 1700s, disguises himself as a Muslim and infiltrates the Ottoman Empire with the goal of weakening it. He tells his readers: "when the unity of Muslims is broken and the common sympathy among them is impaired, their forces will be dissolved and thus we shall easily destroy them... We, the English people, have to make mischief and arouse schism in all our colonies in order that we may live in welfare and luxury."[3]

Hempher intends ultimately to weaken Muslim morals by promoting "alcohol and fornication," but his first step is to promote innovation and disorder in Islam by creating Wahhabism, which is to gain credibility by being on the surface morally strict. For this purpose, he enlists "a gullible, hotheaded young Iraqi in Basra named Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab".[4]

Hempher corrupts and flatters Wahhab until the man is willing to found his own sect.

In the story, Hempher is one of 5,000 British agents with the assignment of weakening Muslims, which the British government plans to increase to 100,000 by the end of the 18th century. Hempher writes, "when we reach this number we shall have brought all Muslims under our sway" and Islam will be rendered "into a miserable state from which it will never recover again."
as i said WAHAABISM founder dajaaal maxamed abdulwahaab was working british as egent for tha weakening of the islamic ottomon goverment and unity of ISLAM.
LobsterUnit
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 10442
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:19 pm
Location: singapore

Re: Shias attacking muslims in medina !

Post by LobsterUnit »

DR-YALAXOOW wrote:
Voltage wrote:
Abdulwahab was two centuries before the British came. Iska aamus ninyaho.

thats your ignorance WARYAAA, read the history of maxamed abdulwahaab and hes meetings of British spy named Hempher the early 1700s .





. Hempher, The British Spy To The Middle East or Confessions of a British Spy is a document purporting to be the account by an 18th century British agent, Hempher, of his instrumental role in founding the conservative Islamic reform movement of Wahhabism.



British spy named Hempher, working in the early 1700s, disguises himself as a Muslim and infiltrates the Ottoman Empire with the goal of weakening it. He tells his readers: "when the unity of Muslims is broken and the common sympathy among them is impaired, their forces will be dissolved and thus we shall easily destroy them... We, the English people, have to make mischief and arouse schism in all our colonies in order that we may live in welfare and luxury."[3]

Hempher intends ultimately to weaken Muslim morals by promoting "alcohol and fornication," but his first step is to promote innovation and disorder in Islam by creating Wahhabism, which is to gain credibility by being on the surface morally strict. For this purpose, he enlists "a gullible, hotheaded young Iraqi in Basra named Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab".[4]

Hempher corrupts and flatters Wahhab until the man is willing to found his own sect.

In the story, Hempher is one of 5,000 British agents with the assignment of weakening Muslims, which the British government plans to increase to 100,000 by the end of the 18th century. Hempher writes, "when we reach this number we shall have brought all Muslims under our sway" and Islam will be rendered "into a miserable state from which it will never recover again."
as i said WAHAABISM founder dajaaal maxamed abdulwahaab was working british as egent for tha weakening of the islamic ottomon goverment and unity of ISLAM.


Image
melo
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2483
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:27 pm

Re: Shias attacking muslims in medina !

Post by melo »

Who are you to judge who is Muslim or not? Abu Sufyan ra is considered a sahabi by ahlussunah. When they cast aspersions upon him, they cast aspersions upon Abu bakr, Umar, Utham (and his clan the bani umayya). That's because all 3 guys accepted Abu Sufyan. You don't understand the political games they play bro. They start with characters like Abu Sufyan, then Uthman and then finally culminate with the shaykhayn.

And Nasrallah and his crew have insulted other sahabah, including Aisha ra.
HutuKing you idiot Abu Sufyan(R.A) may allah bless him with paradise he died as a shahiid and he was sahaba. You dont know how much trouble Muahwiya caused for Hadrat Ali, he whipped up so much propaganda, so much tension this guy was the divider of the Ummah. He and the kharijites were the downfall of Hadrat ALi (RH) the great rightly guided calipha went through many tests because of Muawiyah and his lavish style he loved and wanted to sustan during his cousin Hadrat Othman's reign. Ali liked muslims to follow the tradition of Rasullah and not love this world but Muawiyah wanted to live like the Babylons in Syria. God bless Hadrat Ali(RH) ahe fought with his heart to stop Muawiyah and fought for Allah. I cant believe you side with Muawiyah and you hate his father Abu sufyan who was good muslim at the end. Muawiyah was big time qabilist he wanted Ummayad reign over the holy Banu Hashim reign and he know the Hashimites were more superior and holier than Ummayad even through they were humble.
Subhannlah. Mucaawiya was a sahabi. Your absolute dismissal of him is no characteristic of Ahlus-sunnah. The way of ahlussunah is to not speak of inter-saahabi wars, only to say who was right and who was right. Cali RA was most defs right. But never ever ever did Cali ever make aspersions about Mucaawiya. You can even check it out in their baatil shiica sources.

Mucaawiya and Bani umayya were very angry that the murders of Uthman were in Cali's ranks. Uthman RA was the rightful amir, and was murdered in COLD BLOOD at his residence while reading the quran. Cali RA sent his two sons to defend Uthman, but most of the sahabah thought it was a fitnah and stayed at home. Mucaawiya himself went to Uthman and asked him to go back to Syria to him, but again Uthman, knowing that his fate was coming, refused.

Mucaawiya and caaisha asked Ali to hand over the criminals, in which he refused. It was in honour of their fallen brother that they fought, and not some power rage. When the romans i think asked at the high of the Cali-Mucaawiya beef, whether they could bypass syria and attack Cali, Mucaawiya said to them that if they dared tried, he would turn his military against them.

Mucaawiya ra was a good amir, may allah swt bless him. The major Sahabahs all made bayca to him, and some were part of his advisory team. He still lead the salat, enforced shariica, and fought Jihaad. He was a true mujaahid in comparision to the Khaariji Al-shabaab you talk about.
melo
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2483
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:27 pm

Re: Shias attacking muslims in medina !

Post by melo »

http://qa.sunnipath.com/issue_view.asp? ... &CATE=3600

And this is from a sufi sunni site, for all those speaking Wahabi conspiracy.

What you guys are saying about Abu Sufyan and mucaawiya is an insult. You guys have fallen for Shiica propaganda.

How about the fact that some of their Shiica imaams were deviant in their Aqeedah? Some of them were mutazlli influenced. But you don't hear this from Shiica propaganda.
union
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 9071
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:02 pm

Re: Shias attacking muslims in medina !

Post by union »

grandpa:

Image
Image
Image
melo
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2483
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:27 pm

Re: Shias attacking muslims in medina !

Post by melo »

http://www.ahlelbayt.com/

Here's a good website. Its unfortunate that many of you guys have been conned by Shiica. Iran has done a fantastic job :down:
User avatar
DR-YALAXOOW
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 13991
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:26 am

Re: Shias attacking muslims in medina !

Post by DR-YALAXOOW »

i myself dont agree attacking mucaawiya or abu sufyaan or the power hungry tribe called
bani umayad
but if shiicas attack mucaawiya or other members of binu umayad qabiil they do so becuase of BINU UMMAYYADS war against prophets maxameds family, not only calii bin abii daalib but even children of cali such as hassan and hussein.

you have to undertand where it come from the unger of shiicas, it come from killings of granchildren of rasuul scw hussein and even hes children was coold blood murdared by yaziid ibn mucaawiya ibn abuu sufyaaan.

yaziiid murdared granchildren of rasuul for only one reason whichs to become absolut ruler and bin umayad sultane therefore he removed all threatd from binu haashim whichs rasuul scw family thats why he killed even granchildren of prophets scw.


as i said i dont agree shiicaas on attacing omar and uthmaan and abuubakar thats extrem but only that only does not make shiicas as gaaalo kuffaar.
shiicas have like sunnahs extremist which sometimes have extrem views.

but myself i see wahaabis extrem view whichs glorifying a murdare such as YAZIIID IBN MUCAAWIYA.
melo YOU consider sheeydaan yaziid as big sahaabi for only making ungry shiicaas and for deviding the muslims.

the only reason that wahaabis love YAZIID IBN MUCAAWIYA is for to creat hate between muslims, and wahaabis are against unity of muslims therefore they gloryfied the killer sheeydaan YAZIID IBN MUCAAWIYA WHICH even our mad-hab of imaaam shaafici ahlu sunnah said YAZIID WAS SHEEYDAAN and hes worst kind of sheeydan and yaziid was not sahaabi.

WHY I DEFEND SHIICAAS?


walaahi waa magaca ilaaheey waxaa jirtey big proboganda against shiicaas,

couple years ago muxaadaro uu jeediyey sheekh soomaali ah sacuudiga wax ku bartey(wahaabi) ayaan dhageysanayey sheekhaas wuxuu yiri.
shiicada quraaanka waxay ku darsadeen suurado cusub oo quraanka ay akhristaan iyo quraankeena ahlu sunnah isku mid maaha!!

arrintaas waxay ila noqotey arrin cajiib ah si aan u ogaado xaqiiqda arintaa waxaan bilaabey reseach ku saabsan haddii ay shiicada heeystaan quraaan lagu darey aayado cusub.

baaritaankeeygii waxaan liberary islaami ah ka helay kitaaab quraaan ah ee lagu daabacey TEHRAAN IRAN 1990kii, kitaabkii quraanka ahaa ee iiraan iyo kitaab quraan lagu dabaacey MADIINA SACUUDI ARABIA ayaan is barbardhigey waxaa ii cadaaatey inaysan xitaa shaqal aysan ku kala duwaneeyn 100% isku mid.
kitaaabka tehraan lagu daabacey iyo kitaabka madiina sacuudiga lagu daabacey.

marka waxaan la yaabey sheekhaaas soomaaliga waxa beenta ugu wacan, waxaan la yaabey ninkaa weeyn ee sheekha ah beenta intaa la eg muxuu u sheegayaa.

ka soo gudub, habeen talefishinka almustaqill dood ka jirtey ku saabsaneyd shiica vs sunnah, ninkii shiicada aheeyd wuxuuu ku eedeeyey ninkii sunnah ahaa sacuuudi ahaa(wahaabi) in sunnada wahaabiga ay quraanka yiraahdeen waxaa ka maqan aayado baddan sida AAYADA rajmiga iyo aayada naas nuujinta.

taasoo micnahedu yahay sunnada siiba wahabiyada waxay aaminsan yihiin quraanka waa incomplete.
arrintii ayaan baaritaan ku sameeyey waxaa ka naxay waxa ii soo baxey taasoo ah ninkii shiicada ahaa inuu run sheegayo, culumada sacuudiga ay aamisan yihiin aayado quraan ah allah samada ka soo dajiyey inay GOAT arri ay cuntey aayada naaas nuujinta waliba axaadiis saxiix ah arrintaa ay ku sheegayaan ay jiraaan, iyo aayada rajmiga quraanka laga ilaawey.

marka waxaaba ii cadaatey wixii shiicada lagu eedeynayey inay sacuudiga sunnada wahaabiyada ayba iyaga ku dhaqmaan.


arrin kale aan la yaabey. waxay tahay.

SHIICADA waxaa laga caayaa dhaqan foolxun one nigth stand MUTCAH la yiraahdo nin iyo naaag iyaga is nikaaxssada saacado ayna galmo sex sameeyaan, markii ay sameeyaana ninka naagta kala tagaan guurkii ku meel gaarka ahaa ee ku koobnaa 1 hours uu noqdo wax xalaal ah,

waxaan la yaabey inay sacuudiga sunnah wahabiyada ay iyaguna qabaaan arrin u eg mutcah taasoo la yiraahdo MISYAAAR, waa mutcadii magaca loo badaley.


marka shiiicada iyo sunnada farqiga u dhaxeeyo maaha.

quraan kale inay shiicada heeystaan.

shiicada 5 salaad ay dukadaan
shiicada nabi maxamed scw iyo allah ayey aamisan yihiin sida sunnada

marka qilaafka maaha qilaaf weeyn laakiin BRITISH AGENT maxamed abdulwahaab followers ayaa exggeration ku sameeya farqiga shiicada and sunnada si ISLAAMKA U NODO QUWAD tafaraaruq waligeed ku sugnaata oo cadawga islaamka ay u helaaan ISLAAM aan mideeysneeyn.
Last edited by DR-YALAXOOW on Mon Feb 07, 2011 8:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Locked
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “General - General Discussions”