What's wrong with the snet community?

[melo]

Qabiil is a wonderful, unique thing. We should respect it.

I am not demeaning the importance of Qabiil. I am just stating that it is not more important than the diin. Our first alliance should be to Allah swt, his prophet and the Muslims. Our tol comes second. If someone from out tol apostates, he is no longer one of us,

could you tell us what is specifically you saw and complaining about??

because i will be figthing at your side if anything wrong is said about our religion

There are users on this forum who claim Shariica is barbaric and are calling for secularism.

[Monsieur]

Islam is more important, i agree.

[quark]

melo, what do you expect from this folks?

i lost all hope when i first read comments calling tribal leaders/warlords mujahids and shahids

[Kukri]

melo

adigoo darbiga la murmaa la qaatay.

[Monsieur]

I sometimes wonder if Psychiatric Hospitals allow people to access the internet, because there are a lot of nutcases posting on this forum subhannalah.

[melo]

melo, what do you expect from this folks?

i lost all hope when i first read comments calling tribal leaders/warlords mujahids and shahids

Walle thats one of the most amazing things i've seen. Cabdiwahab kulaha Caydiid waa imaam iyo Mahdi Aucudhubillah. Then we have the faqash supports calling Siyaad Aaabe. Now we have faroole being called a mujaahid . Amazing stuff.

melo

adigoo darbiga la murmaa la qaatay.

That could apply to the qabiil murmurs there. Faqash supports are darbis, they will never listen to anyone. Similar with Caydiid worships, and CY worshippers and now Shariif Worshippers. Yet, this doesn't support people from debating eachother.

[Kukri]

In snet qabil takes precedence over everything else, so ah is xiijin sxb.

[AhlulbaytSoldier]

I havent seen AW and Yalaxow make any kufriyaat statements.
But as for Union, if he made any disbelieving comments he should be banned without a single doubt. However if he is muslim and did not make the statements you accuse of him then he should not be banned.

Allah swt punishes whom He wants and He shows mercy to whom He wants.

[Hyperactive]

what happened it again?

[melo]

I havent seen AW and Yalaxow make any kufriyaat statements.
But as for Union, if he made any disbelieving comments he should be banned without a single doubt. However if he is muslim and did not make the statements you accuse of him then he should not be banned.

Allah swt punishes whom He wants and He shows mercy to whom He wants.

Yalaxoow mocks the Shariica all the time, calling it barbaric, continuously demeans the Xadiths, doubts Quranic statements etc. Cabdiwahab is a secularist and promotes it. Enough said.

Hutu, you must be aware of Union's opinions. They are clearer than day and night.

[union]

what happened it again?

Melo couldn’t handle my dissent in the other thread and is now making a cry baby thread requesting back up.


Also, I would like him to prove where I supposedly mocked the prophet and the symbols of the faith if he is honest.

[melo]

Melo couldn’t handle my dissent in the other thread and is now making a cry baby thread requesting back up.


Also, I would like him to prove where I supposedly mocked the prophet and the symbols of the faith if he is honest.

Sxb, i destroyed your arguments point by point. I just wanted to speak to the SNET community on why they keep silent on religious matters, but respond on qabiil ones.


Simply answer this

1- Do you consider the penal law of the Shariica, which is mentioned in the Quran and Sunnah, Barbaric? Yes or no
2Have you ever called it backward? Yes or no.
3- Did you not claim Shariica controlling the world is unattainable, a myth, mocking me for believing in this? Yes or no? Is this not mocking the direct words of God and his prophet, who state that Islaam will rule supreme as a political entity under ciise? Yes or not


Simple yes/no answers will suffice. If you lie, i will have to expose you

[union]

Melo, I already told you I believe in secular government where the state does not intervene in religious matters. No need to get so overworked about my disagreement with your dreams of a wahabi shariah state.

[melo]

Melo, I already told you I believe in secular government where the state does not intervene in religious matters. No need to get so overworked about my disagreement with your dreams of a wahabi shariah state.

"State does not intervene in religious matters". Don't be slick sxb. It is precisely the other way around. The secular state prevents religion surfacing on the political landscape. Islam is not a-political. The kufrinmo of secularism is sooooo clear that even Sunnis and Shiicas agree


Why did you ignore my questions ? Please do answer them.

1- Do you consider the penal law of the Shariica, which is mentioned in the Quran and Sunnah, Barbaric? Yes or no? If yes, is this not mockery of Allah's diin?
2 Have you ever called it backward? Yes or no? If yes, is this not mocking Allah and his messenger?
3- Did you not claim Shariica controlling the world is unattainable, a myth, mocking me for believing in this? Yes or no? Is this not mocking the direct words of God and his prophet, who state that Islaam will rule supreme as a political entity under ciise? Yes or no

[juzme123]

SO is this thing about Union being an atheist actually true then ?