Page 2 of 2
Re: Who has the most to gain or lose from more political par
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 3:43 pm
by Cirwaaq
Madelina wrote:Cirwaaq anyone can form a party but in order to take part in the local elections you have to have certain number of constituency to even qualify. Once they qualify they can take part in the local elections and the top 3 parties will go on to take part in the general elections. The 3 parties that come out of the local elections will be wheeling and dealing to secure the supporters of the failed parties. You will hear xisbi hebel oo ki biray one of the 3 parties..etc. I think the Harti camp stand a good chance since people have politically matured but need to work that extra hard to get their constituency to participate
Aligab, you have a point, but it's equally important that non-isaaq politicians inaay ka muuqdan in the parties
*Hey I have an idea why don't we have more than one vice-president, that way all the SL qabilo will be represented?
Eyes open
You are thinking outside the box
Re: Who has the most to gain or lose from more political par
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:25 pm
by Rightwing
Very interesting article. This remind me before 2006 when we use to frame some debate on intelligence way.
Re: Who has the most to gain or lose from more political par
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:42 pm
by hargaysaay
Garxajis are too big to form allience you have habar yonis that are pro udub and cidagale pro ucid the same goes to habar awal that is just my opinion
Re: Who has the most to gain or lose from more political par
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:55 pm
by Blue_609
*Hey I have an idea why don't we have more than one vice-president, that way all the SL qabilo will be represented?
madelina wow u r so genius .. brilliant idea
i tell u wat why not even have more than one president why not have 3 presidents so all 3 habros rule at the same time ?
Re: Who has the most to gain or lose from more political par
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 6:10 pm
by abdikarim86
Blue_609 wrote:*Hey I have an idea why don't we have more than one vice-president, that way all the SL qabilo will be represented?
madelina wow u r so genius .. brilliant idea
i tell u wat why not even have more than one president why not have 3 presidents so all 3 habros rule at the same time ?
Ma samaroon baad wali sheeganaysa?
Rightwing make sure this athiest faqash does not post here
Re: Who has the most to gain or lose from more political par
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 6:20 pm
by Blue_609
abdikarim86 wrote:Blue_609 wrote:*Hey I have an idea why don't we have more than one vice-president, that way all the SL qabilo will be represented?
madelina wow u r so genius .. brilliant idea
i tell u wat why not even have more than one president why not have 3 presidents so all 3 habros rule at the same time ?
Ma samaroon baad wali sheeganaysa?
Rightwing make sure this
athiest faqash does not post here
istaghfirullah .
Re: Who has the most to gain or lose from more political par
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2011 6:40 pm
by SLJOOFAY
Madelina wrote:Cirwaaq anyone can form a party but in order to take part in the local elections you have to have certain number of constituency to even qualify. Once they qualify they can take part in the local elections and the top 3 parties will go on to take part in the general elections.
The 3 parties that come out of the local elections will be wheeling and dealing to secure the supporters of the failed parties. You will hear xisbi hebel oo ki biray one of the 3 parties..etc. I think the Harti camp stand a good chance since people have politically matured but need to work that extra hard to get their constituency to participate
Aligab, you have a point, but it's equally important that non-isaaq politicians inaay ka muuqdan in the parties
*Hey I have an idea why don't we have more than one vice-president, that way all the SL qabilo will be represented?
Madelina, this has already happened once with the formation of the three current political party's and will not be reform but rather a repeat. Like i said earlier if this happens during every election then there will be no stability as there will always be the possibility of three new party's for every election.
Re: Who has the most to gain or lose from more political par
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:00 am
by LiQaaye_TDH
hargaysaay wrote:Garxajis are too big to form allience you have habar yonis that are pro udub and cidagale pro ucid the same goes to habar awal that is just my opinion
Thats why Ucid will never get any where, even if they united against the rest they would never win, they need to unite with atleast another isaaq tribe..
Look at the last election HY and Gedabuursi didnt work out..
Sljoofay.... The Losers would be Habar Awal if they opened this new Political, if they dont open any new party, the next president wil definatly be Muse Bixi!!!
Re: Who has the most to gain or lose from more political par
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:16 am
by SLJOOFAY
LiQaaye_TDH wrote:hargaysaay wrote:Garxajis are too big to form allience you have habar yonis that are pro udub and cidagale pro ucid the same goes to habar awal that is just my opinion
Thats why Ucid will never get any where, even if they united against the rest they would never win, they need to unite with atleast another isaaq tribe..
Look at the last election HY and Gedabuursi didnt work out..
Sljoofay.... The Losers would be Habar Awal if they opened this new Political, if they dont open any new party, the next president wil definatly be Muse Bixi!!!
Liq, HA will definatly form new party's because they believe that they don't have a chance of winning if Musse Bixi takes over and there right. Think about it this way, if there were no new party's he wud have a chance because the Kulmiye die hards wud vote for him, if there is a new HJ party he will neva win bcos his support base wud be split. Also Most HA intelectuals know that Muse Bixi is not president material.
Re: Who has the most to gain or lose from more political par
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 1:06 pm
by AsadSL
Somalilanders wont vote for a dhulbahnate leader and the landers in awdal have no clue what dhulos is. WaranCade could work but i dont think muse bixi will win.
Re: Who has the most to gain or lose from more political par
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:11 pm
by *Nobleman*
Interesting. I personally know one guy waiting for the outcome of these results so that he can start his own party.
Laakin if muse bixhii ever becomes the president, that is the day sland takes a massive step back, the guy has no political pedigree whatsover, There are probably a good 10 candidates that are better than him.
Re: Who has the most to gain or lose from more political par
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:20 pm
by abdikarim86
*Nobleman* wrote:Interesting. I personally know one guy waiting for the outcome of these results so that he can start his own party.
Laakin if muse bixhii ever becomes the president, that is the day sland takes a massive step back, the guy has no political pedigree whatsover, There are probably a good 10 candidates that are better than him.
God willing he will not win
Re: Who has the most to gain or lose from more political par
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 9:25 am
by malakumod
Madelina wrote:I would like to see a Dhulbahanto president or vice-president in the next elections
'somaliland' waa habartii qoryaha kuratay ee istidhi qaad ee markii ay qaadi kariweyday qoriga kale dul sartay.
Re: Who has the most to gain or lose from more political par
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 9:35 am
by Madelina
I would vote for Abdulaziz Samaale and Bashe Mohamed Farah any day
They make a good team
Re: Who has the most to gain or lose from more political par
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 3:28 am
by KyrieJama
Madelina wrote:I would vote for Abdulaziz Samaale and Bashe Mohamed Farah any day
They make a good team
A very good team indeed