Page 2 of 3

Re: Ogaden has always been at war

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:16 pm
by SahanGalbeed
It is usually and in the rest of the civilized world a sign of backwardness , to always be at war with someone ,just saying . :lol:

Re: Ogaden has always been at war

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:19 pm
by metamorphosis
SahanGalbeed wrote:It is usually and in the rest of the civilized world a sign of backwardness , to always be at war with someone ,just saying . :lol:
eydoorboy we fought with mushrikiin while you fight with other somalis. Thats what makes noble warriors. Also, are you calling The usa uncivilized? :lol:

Re: Ogaden has always been at war

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:26 pm
by SahanGalbeed
The sad thing with you is , you actually believe it .

Re: Ogaden has always been at war

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:32 pm
by metamorphosis
Its called history sxb. Bal dib ogu noqo.

Re: Ogaden has always been at war

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:44 pm
by Adali
wiilkaan madax adagaa ! Sayidka was Ogaden but his movement wasn't apart from(Bah Gerri and few Makahil), the same goes for the Cawliyahan revolt in Jubaland, Cawliyahan is Ogaden but their revolt was not an Ogaden revolt, it was exclusively Cawliyahan. Whiles a whole section Maxamed Suber were supporting the colonial masters and giving them access through their land and paying tribute, fully accepting the Gaalo colonial masters.

Get that into your head, Mareexaan Daraawiish was not exclusive to any particular Mareexaan subclan. That is why we are mentioned as a whole on political maps whiles on demographic maps we are grouped into subclans. Politically we were united in Jihaad against Gaalo, although different subclan had their own independent armies they were all united as Daraawiish sometime one subclan say Talhe taking the lead another time Ali Dheere or Farah Ugaas or Rer Ahmed taking the lead.

this is my last response to you on the matter, clearly your acting stupid.

Re: Ogaden has always been at war

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:48 pm
by Adali
SahanGalbeed wrote:It is usually and in the rest of the civilized world a sign of backwardness , to always be at war with someone ,just saying . :lol:
what do you suggest to do with colonial Gaalo invaders ??

let me guess, this.
Image

Re: Ogaden has always been at war

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:51 pm
by SahanGalbeed
Just do whatever your clan did , do you want me to bring you pics ?

Re: Ogaden has always been at war

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:54 pm
by Adali
I have no idea what you are referring to but its best you stick to the subject of this topic and not hijack it with Somaliland matters.

Re: Ogaden has always been at war

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:56 pm
by SahanGalbeed
Adali wrote:I have no idea what you are referring to but its best you stick to the subject of this topic and not hijack it with Somaliland matters.
Dad waalan baad tihin . Waxaad ku kala faantaan ma'ba kala ogidiin horta , midda labaad na waxa weeye , miyaan ku la hadlay anigu , waxaan la haysta ninka ogadeen e , adiga ayuun ba iska soo dhex galay sheekada , haye ?

Re: Ogaden has always been at war

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:26 pm
by metamorphosis
Adali wrote:wiilkaan madax adagaa ! Sayidka was Ogaden but his movement wasn't apart from(Bah Gerri and few Makahil), the same goes for the Cawliyahan revolt in Jubaland, Cawliyahan is Ogaden but their revolt was not an Ogaden revolt, it was exclusively Cawliyahan. Whiles a whole section Maxamed Suber were supporting the colonial masters and giving them access through their land and paying tribute, fully accepting the Gaalo colonial masters.

Get that into your head, Mareexaan Daraawiish was not exclusive to any particular Mareexaan subclan. That is why we are mentioned as a whole on political maps whiles on demographic maps we are grouped into subclans. Politically we were united in Jihaad against Gaalo, although different subclan had their own independent armies they were all united as Daraawiish sometime one subclan say Talhe taking the lead another time Ali Dheere or Farah Ugaas or Rer Ahmed taking the lead.

this is my last response to you on the matter, clearly your acting stupid.
The word.ogaden is used In this text not auliyahan. I think you are mistaking The auliyahan revolution In The nfd to The ogaden revolution. ina mursal was pushing The kenyans out and killling large numbers of their british leaders. That was In The nfd. This one is In kismaayo. Can you prove that mxmed zubeer sided with clonials? No.you cant because you are spewing nonsense. I am not really interested In marehan demographics and all The wars they fought. i am here talking on The history of my great ancestors. ninyahoow bal isdaji anigu marexaan inaan caayo meesha uma imanee. :)

Re: Ogaden has always been at war

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:28 pm
by metamorphosis
SahanGalbeed wrote:
Adali wrote:I have no idea what you are referring to but its best you stick to the subject of this topic and not hijack it with Somaliland matters.
Dad waalan baad tihin . Waxaad ku kala faantaan ma'ba kala ogidiin horta , midda labaad na waxa weeye , miyaan ku la hadlay anigu , waxaan la haysta ninka ogadeen e , adiga ayuun ba iska soo dhex galay sheekada , haye ?
Maya ee adigu meel rag darood isku haysta yaa kuugu cazuumay?

Re: Ogaden has always been at war

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:32 pm
by SahanGalbeed
metamorphosis wrote:
SahanGalbeed wrote:
Adali wrote:I have no idea what you are referring to but its best you stick to the subject of this topic and not hijack it with Somaliland matters.
Dad waalan baad tihin . Waxaad ku kala faantaan ma'ba kala ogidiin horta , midda labaad na waxa weeye , miyaan ku la hadlay anigu , waxaan la haysta ninka ogadeen e , adiga ayuun ba iska soo dhex galay sheekada , haye ?
Maya ee adigu meel rag darood isku haysta yaa kuugu cazuumay?
Mar aad tidha maraykan baan la mid ahay oo " we're always at war " sida maraykanka ,iyo mar aad is moodo inaad internet-ka gebigiisaba daarood loogu talo galay iney somalida kale is hor xag-xagtaan , ma wax aan lagu qoslin baa daaroodku :lol:

Re: Ogaden has always been at war

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:44 pm
by metamorphosis
Maya sahanoow waxaan ula jeeday meel laba nin oo daarood ah isku haysta hadaad dalaq tiro Dee caafimaadkaada baa ku bi. :)

Re: Ogaden has always been at war

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:30 pm
by Teeri
Adali wrote:these warriors are not Ogaden, they are only Cawliyahan, because in Jubaland the Maxamed Suber were in bed with the colonizers. so is it not unfair for Cawliyahan to be grouped Maxamed Suber under Ogaden when they were fighting them along with their colonizing Masters, the Cawliyahan killed more Ogaden in Jubaland than any colonizer or Marehan because they hated the Maxamed Suber for joining the Colonizers.

The Daraawiish of the South were the Galti Marehan and the Cawliyahan, don't try to lie about history, Cawliyahan. :up:
stop you propaganda. you obviously have not heard of such men as Sultan Ahmed Magan fighting both the brits and itlaians in the jubbas, where as cawlyahan fought them in the nfd as it is not a mohamed subeer land but belongs mainly to cawlyahan, cabudwaq and cabdalla.

absame gave each other regions to defends against. mohamed subeer with makhail and bartire and galmise fought in the jubbas, the others in the nfd and ogaden and somaliland with bah gari and dulbahante lead by the sayed

ps: the white men had marehan and majertien licking his ass in the south, this is a well known fact. since when did boons like marehans help the warrior cawlyahans? if they did why did calwyhan leader cabdurahman mursal kicked their ass in gedo and dumbed their sugar in the river for supporting the Europeans? answer this.

read some tariiq before you come up with crap

Re: Ogaden has always been at war

Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:55 pm
by metamorphosis
You are reer dini, reer dalal who came to settle in Gedo during the last tenure of MSB and during the civil war especially during the time of Bare Hiraale reign in Kismaayo. Marexan that primarily reside in Gedo are Reer Xassan and Talxe. During the start of the influx of reer dini in Gedo(which was mostly during the civil war). Reer Xassan was against this and were on the verge of exterminating them from Gedo its only when Talxe came to act as arbitor were they allowed to stay. you have your information mixed up and I dont know who supplies you with the information you throw in this end of the world, but you if you want to be taken seriously, then make sure what you say is correct. If you are trolling, be mindful that I don't deal with trolls. and As for Mz, MZ killed the Govonor of Kismayu and were sanctioned in Kismaayo in the early 1900's and people were prevented from trading with them and were not allowed to enter the city. In NFD another high official from the EAst African protectorate was killed in Wajir by MZ and MZ did resist the occupation. By The way, if you are trying to divide ogaden then try harder.
http://www.britishcolonialafrica.com/PDFS/8_MAJOR_WALLACE_BLAKE.pdf <thats The link you requested. immerse your mind and body in it..