Re: Ogaden has always been at war
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:16 pm
It is usually and in the rest of the civilized world a sign of backwardness , to always be at war with someone ,just saying . 

Largest online Somali community!
http://somalinet.com/forums/
eydoorboy we fought with mushrikiin while you fight with other somalis. Thats what makes noble warriors. Also, are you calling The usa uncivilized?SahanGalbeed wrote:It is usually and in the rest of the civilized world a sign of backwardness , to always be at war with someone ,just saying .
what do you suggest to do with colonial Gaalo invaders ??SahanGalbeed wrote:It is usually and in the rest of the civilized world a sign of backwardness , to always be at war with someone ,just saying .
Dad waalan baad tihin . Waxaad ku kala faantaan ma'ba kala ogidiin horta , midda labaad na waxa weeye , miyaan ku la hadlay anigu , waxaan la haysta ninka ogadeen e , adiga ayuun ba iska soo dhex galay sheekada , haye ?Adali wrote:I have no idea what you are referring to but its best you stick to the subject of this topic and not hijack it with Somaliland matters.
The word.ogaden is used In this text not auliyahan. I think you are mistaking The auliyahan revolution In The nfd to The ogaden revolution. ina mursal was pushing The kenyans out and killling large numbers of their british leaders. That was In The nfd. This one is In kismaayo. Can you prove that mxmed zubeer sided with clonials? No.you cant because you are spewing nonsense. I am not really interested In marehan demographics and all The wars they fought. i am here talking on The history of my great ancestors. ninyahoow bal isdaji anigu marexaan inaan caayo meesha uma imanee.Adali wrote:wiilkaan madax adagaa ! Sayidka was Ogaden but his movement wasn't apart from(Bah Gerri and few Makahil), the same goes for the Cawliyahan revolt in Jubaland, Cawliyahan is Ogaden but their revolt was not an Ogaden revolt, it was exclusively Cawliyahan. Whiles a whole section Maxamed Suber were supporting the colonial masters and giving them access through their land and paying tribute, fully accepting the Gaalo colonial masters.
Get that into your head, Mareexaan Daraawiish was not exclusive to any particular Mareexaan subclan. That is why we are mentioned as a whole on political maps whiles on demographic maps we are grouped into subclans. Politically we were united in Jihaad against Gaalo, although different subclan had their own independent armies they were all united as Daraawiish sometime one subclan say Talhe taking the lead another time Ali Dheere or Farah Ugaas or Rer Ahmed taking the lead.
this is my last response to you on the matter, clearly your acting stupid.
Maya ee adigu meel rag darood isku haysta yaa kuugu cazuumay?SahanGalbeed wrote:Dad waalan baad tihin . Waxaad ku kala faantaan ma'ba kala ogidiin horta , midda labaad na waxa weeye , miyaan ku la hadlay anigu , waxaan la haysta ninka ogadeen e , adiga ayuun ba iska soo dhex galay sheekada , haye ?Adali wrote:I have no idea what you are referring to but its best you stick to the subject of this topic and not hijack it with Somaliland matters.
Mar aad tidha maraykan baan la mid ahay oo " we're always at war " sida maraykanka ,iyo mar aad is moodo inaad internet-ka gebigiisaba daarood loogu talo galay iney somalida kale is hor xag-xagtaan , ma wax aan lagu qoslin baa daaroodkumetamorphosis wrote:Maya ee adigu meel rag darood isku haysta yaa kuugu cazuumay?SahanGalbeed wrote:Dad waalan baad tihin . Waxaad ku kala faantaan ma'ba kala ogidiin horta , midda labaad na waxa weeye , miyaan ku la hadlay anigu , waxaan la haysta ninka ogadeen e , adiga ayuun ba iska soo dhex galay sheekada , haye ?Adali wrote:I have no idea what you are referring to but its best you stick to the subject of this topic and not hijack it with Somaliland matters.
stop you propaganda. you obviously have not heard of such men as Sultan Ahmed Magan fighting both the brits and itlaians in the jubbas, where as cawlyahan fought them in the nfd as it is not a mohamed subeer land but belongs mainly to cawlyahan, cabudwaq and cabdalla.Adali wrote:these warriors are not Ogaden, they are only Cawliyahan, because in Jubaland the Maxamed Suber were in bed with the colonizers. so is it not unfair for Cawliyahan to be grouped Maxamed Suber under Ogaden when they were fighting them along with their colonizing Masters, the Cawliyahan killed more Ogaden in Jubaland than any colonizer or Marehan because they hated the Maxamed Suber for joining the Colonizers.
The Daraawiish of the South were the Galti Marehan and the Cawliyahan, don't try to lie about history, Cawliyahan.