grandpakhalif wrote:You should buy Kitaabul-Tawxiid then maybe you will be on siraatul mustaqiim.
Saxib, are you trying to say i am not in the siraatul musatqim? what is this arrogance and hatred that you and your likes have, that you believe that you are correct and those who do not read you corrupted books written by corrupted sheikhs who came from a corrupted land (Qarnush Shaydan) you regard them as not on the siraatul mustaqim, how do you know? are you seating yourself in a position where you can judge a mu'min? what kind of akhlaaq and adab is this?
The kutub of the salaf is enough for me, this najdi man has done more harm to the ummah then anyone before, if only you could go back in time and see how he behaved and accused muslims of being blasphemers for visiting the grave of the prophet, and how he was a muslim who isolated himself into starting his own version of the deen.
The prophet said a renovater of the deen will come every 100 years, then how come the najdi said that the last 800 years was filled with bida and shirk?
How dare the Wahhabies claim to follow the Salaf, when they misinterpreted the fundamental teachings of the Salaf and all their followers?
Ibn Taymiyah and ibn Abdil-Wahhab Najdi were not alive during the Salaf era. Hence, take a look at the time era of the master minds that set out the framework that the Wahhabies followed in belief:
Ibn Taymiyah
(b.661 AH- d.728AH)(1263/1328CE)
came 400 years later after the Salaf period ended.
ibn Abdil-Wahhab Najdi
(b.1117AH- d.1206AH)(1703/1792CE)
came 900 years later after the Salaf period ended.
Note!
The wahabi/salafi claim is that he is [second to Ibn Taymiyah] the only reviver Allah has sent in eight hundred years of scholarship which contradicts the hadeeth of the
Messenger of Allah is which he said:
“Allah will raise for this community at the end of every hundred years the one who will renovate its religion for it.”
[Narrated by Abu Hurayrah, Sunan Abu Dawud, hadeeth no. 2011]
Mu-hammed Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab Najdi
and his "Master"
were NOT reviver's of Islam!
In fact they denied eight hundred years of Islamic revival
Thats right 800Years of Islamic Revival
Therefore, both were not alive in the first three century era after the immigration (Hijrah) of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him), from Mecca to al-Madinah.
Thus, these two Imaams of the salafi sect are separated from the age of the Salafas--Saalihoon by six centuries. Inspite of this great gap between the Salafas-Saalihoon and the Imaams of the salafi sect, the latter heeds the propagations of these two individuals who appear on the scene in a belated age, distanced far and wide from the Salafas-Saalihoon.
Ibn ‘Abdul-Wahhab innovated deviant and misleading ways and beliefs and managed to allure some ignorant people to follow him.
His deviant and misleading ways and beliefs disagreed with the sayings of the scholars of the Religion.
His deviant beliefs led him to label the believers as blasphemers! He falsely claimed visiting the grave of the Holy Nabi, sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam, and performing the tawassul by him as shirk!
Additionally, he falsely claimed visiting the graves of other prophets and righteous Muslims (awliya’) and performing tawassul by them was shirk as well.
He added to this by saying,
“To call upon the Holy Nabi, sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam, when performing tawassul by the Holy Nabi is shirk.”
This is not true because Bilal the companion and friend of the nabi (saw) made tawwasul with tears in his eyes , so if any salafi or wahabi or najdi or whatever agrees with this kutub, you are declaring sayyidi bilal (ra) did shirk and was a blasphemer (naudubilla).
Never shall i read such a disgusting book, refuted hundreds of times.
Thank the british for preserving your wretched sect that begun in Najd, the land where the prophet refused to make dua for.
