

Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators






Same here, i'm not complaining.Turbulence wrote:He took two points away from Chelsea today. He is okay in my book.


La ilaha ilalaCaliBurco wrote:Subeer you watching match of the day?
It gets worse, guess who decided to follow Suarez on Twitter today?
Yes, Mike Tyson![]()



The F.A. discriminate, no doubt. But Suarez is nothing short of a prick, man. He's racist, foul-behaved and has such a punchable faceLegendarySS4 wrote:10 match ban, this fucker deserves it but F.A gave Terry a 4 match ban for being racist? Lol


We need to properly go to war with the FA over this. We've been used, time and time again by those aging, incompetent, racist, scouse hating c*nts. Enough. No **** more.
Whilst a 5/6 game ban would be ok, it still means Luis would be back for the next campaign, banning him for the first five matches will stop us from challenging for league. The fa don't want us to win it

"He GNAWED on the arm, he didn't bite it. He was wrong to do that but let's not pretend that he bit Ivanovic's arm off or even drew blood or left a mark"
When compared to a simple yellow card handed to Defoe for the same exact if not worse incident with Mascherano and various extremely dangerous tackles that sometimes even ended player careers that were punished by a standard 3 game ban or not punished at all, this 10 game ban is clearly and utterly unequal. A simple bite that didn’t even mark Ivanovic’s hand cannot be worse than racial abuse that resulted in an 8 game ban to the same Suarez. Apart from the fact that, that racial abuse was a fabricated lie as well.
oh yea that's right, he gnawed someoneCan people please stop referring to a bite, he didnt actually bite anyone!!!!!!!!!

