With that being said no one disagrees with you're argument regarding FGM, it's your stupidity regarding this mythological 'MGM' lmao.

Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators
Male Genital Mutilation is just that: the mutilation of the male organ. Calling it mutilation is correct no matter what the reason given for the procedure. As stated in a previous post I do not equate FGM with MGM. I believe that cliterodectomy of baby girls is the worst type of genital mutilation. Baby boys also suffer tremendously especially without anesthesia. Is having blood vessels, erogenous nerve endings and muscle tissue along with skin cut not detrimental? What about the unnecessary pain and suffering? How about the long-term damage? The male is no longer whole. His manhood is disfigured. The prepuce is a hood of protection and the most pleasurable part of the penis.ZubeirAwal wrote:There is no consensual agreement in all of the studies done to say that MGM is something detrimental, the fact that you mention that along FGM which really is the problem is laughable. All followers of Abraham(a) who are men get circumcised, the prophets after abraham (as) were all circumcised and Somali males will continue to get circumcised. As for the age none of us in our family (males) got cut when we were infants, however between the ages 5-10.
With that being said no one disagrees with you're argument regarding FGM, it's your stupidity regarding this mythological 'MGM' lmao.
Good day, I have seen articles that tout genital mutilation as possibly reducing chances of getting HIV. I do not believe in this. They should be teaching people not to be promiscuous and to protect themselves. The MGM campaign is being stepped up in Africa. There are some men in Africa who think if they get mutilated they can go to prostitutes willy-nilly.Marques wrote:Circumcision reduces chances of HIV i heard too. Tbh it's highly recommended by doctors of all backgrounds. It's not even just a Muslim thing...
Maalin wanaagsan, I believe parents mutilate their baby boys, young daughters and sons out of love and a sense of duty and culture. Some also erroneously believe that this is a compulsory order from Eebe. It is ignorance and shared trauma among families, clans, and cultures that forces people to mutilate their children. What is mind boggling is that even when there is severe pain and misery that is inflicted on these children, they grow up and some of them do the same to their children.QaxootiWaaxid wrote:walahi i get angry beacuz i was mutliated at young age by parents
mgm and fgm should be illegal
If you were a baby boy, would you want to be strapped down and have your most sensitive and intimate part crushed, ripped and sliced without anesthesia for twenty minutes and more? No matter how you rationalize it the answer is no. The Creator Most High designed these parts for a purpose. These parts are not defects. I reiterate, genital mutilation is a life threatening procedure. Many children have died as result of this unnecessary mutilation.Estarix wrote:I have seen cruel videos of MGM but i support it nevertheless, its health benefits outweigh the negatives. The only benefits i have heard so far are reduction in sexual indulgence ( loss of nerve endings ), which is a weak argument.