You are still not getting it Itrah. First off, the development of agriculture - the domestication of plants occurred 12,000 years ago. I'm right when I said you had no clue what people in Eurasia looked like at that time. And like I said that was well before their pigment changed, they were dark people back then, and this is substantiated by genetic research.In this work, we find that the genetic composition of non-African ancestry in the HOA is distinct from the genetic composition of current populations in North Africa and the Middle East.
With these data, we demonstrate that most non-African ancestry in the HOA cannot be the result of admixture within the last few thousand years, and that the majority of admixture probably occurred prior to the advent of agriculture.
What part of what I write don't you understand. You cannot attribute admixture alone to the Somali appearance. Take a rest with your eugenic garbage. Also, why would any African of any group ever want to call themselves negroid, or identify with the word. These are not their classifications.
What evidence do you have to reinforce your assumptions? As far as I'm aware it goes against the conventional scientific knowledge on Somali genealogy.
There is no such thing as "Mediterranean facial traits", so give it a rest. Also, stop masquerading your blatant racism under the veil of science. You are likely not Somali.