Obvioulsy I know more about Somali history than you since I alreadysmooth wrote:Barbie
Your one of those recent tahriib kids brought up with canobooro, you have no clue of history,Siyad berre didn't rule anything in the 60's until the very last few months of it, Aden Abdullah Osman Daar an Hawiye was the first ever president ruling in the 60's, before that we had the Hiraab immate then Ajuuran sultanate for the best part of centuries, no one has more history then we do.
If you want to engage in a debate with me come with facts sxb, I'll promise to chase you out of these forums like I have already done to many before you
AGENT447
Sxb these new breeds of Isaaq's most of them reer tahriib khaat addicts, are like that Westernised materialistic girlfriend, she is with you when $$$ keeps paying for her lingeries food & make-up, but the moment crisis strikes just like the whore she always was, she is gone to find herself a new suitors, ask yourself why they mediated the conflict between the cancer of Somalia that is Puntland (that's how they describe them) and utterly refused to do the same to the others when they requested it, even gone as far as threatening to jail those that tried? I tell you why, it will endanger the Ictiraaf, they want the place to burn to the ground, that's why you see all these terrorist attacks funded by dhiigshiil
I am trying to show the light to my wadani reer koonfurian's that are intoxicated with this unionism crap to let go of this whore and slowly kill that love they still have for her.
karbashed you several times before. But it appears that you didn't pick up the lesson.
Somalia from 1960-1991 is my favorite period when looking in archives, especially in 80s
But like the cambulu crackhead you are talking out'f your ass simultaneously.I don't care what
irrelevant Hawiya president first ruled Somalia in 1960 you probably knew about him from one of my
screen shots. Plus, your so called president being the first to rule Somlia doesn't mean you guys were unionist.
If it wasn't for Isaaq, he would have only ruled Somalia Itali not Somaliland included. But since the cambulu you eat after salat
jimca, I am not sure you'll digest what I just said. So I'll keep it simple.
Yes or No
Did the Hawiya were the last clan to revolt against Siad Barre?
Did not the Hawiya enjoy economic prosperity and development under Siad Barre?
Did not the Hawiya level Xamar to the ground after infighting?
Did not the Hawiya massacre Darrod & Rahawanyan civilians in the south?
Did not the Hawiya hold back Somalia for over 25 years duo to lack of compromise?
Are not the Hawiya currently monopolizing power in Somlaia and preventing any progress?
And here you are now asking why did not Isaaq come and mediate between
Hawiya in the south? How pathetic is that? You had the WHOLE WORLD mediating between
you but with no vail. An entire clan (Cissa of Djibouti) did it best to bring you into the table but
I guess once a Moryaan, you're always a Moryaan. You guys welcomed Abdirxman Tuur as representer of Isaaq during
Inter Isaaq wars to ignite the conflict, yet you have the check to call us traitors while playing victim? And FYI during PL civil war
it wasn't whole Isaaq who mediated between Majertin, but an elder of my own HJ/Muse Abokor sub clan, Boqor Buurmadow. We were freash out of war making peace between Somalis when you guys were still drinking the blood of Raxanywan & minorities in the south.