If I'm not mistaken, I don't think we ever made a rebellious group against him.
We were loyal and stood by Aabe Siad Barre(AUN) side till the end


Moderator: Moderators
SSDF & SPM were Darood rebellion movements against the gov as well.Sowda12 wrote:In my first comment, I spoke out against all rebellious groups. They all should have thought long-term, made agreements\negotiated,and ruled the country togheter. They should have been smarter, effective and taken wiser decisions. Darood is one of the largest, if not the largest clan in Somalia. I can only speak for my sub-sub clan.
If I'm not mistaken, I don't think we ever made a rebellious group against him.
We were loyal and supported Aabe Siad Barre till the end![]()
Rambie wrote:SSDF & SPM were Darood rebellion movements against the gov as well.Sowda12 wrote:In my first comment, I spoke out against all rebellious groups. They all should have thought long-term, made agreements\negotiated,and ruled the country togheter. They should have been smarter, effective and taken wiser decisions. Darood is one of the largest, if not the largest clan in Somalia. I can only speak for my sub-sub clan.
If I'm not mistaken, I don't think we ever made a rebellious group against him.
We were loyal and supported Aabe Siad Barre till the end![]()
Why didn't they look for a solution for Somalia too? Or Siad Barre himself
who refused to step down and only when USC were couple miles away he begged
an Isaaq to save his fragile government himself running away with the gold. They should all worked
for Somalia's well being so I don't get you idea of blaming SNM on your shortcomings. If anything Siad Barre wasn't
a legitimate leader and he should have stepped down long time ago for the greater good of the country since he failed as a president.
Sowda12 wrote:---
Rambie wrote:Sowda12 wrote:---
Decades later or not, he should have stepped down and allow
democracy to be revived again. Instead he played clans against eachother
wich indirectly lead to the current sitiuation. You did know he was still fighting
with SNF in Gedo even after his overthrow, which does not make him any different
from other any tribal leader.
I guess you're a kacaan orphan who was feed
all this shit about Somalia being a great country, well it wasn't.
If Somalia under his rule wassuch a great country, why SSDF, SNM, USC and half dozen other rebellion movements emerged?
That's the real question you're trying to hide by counting his few mediocre achievements.
And what was Barre doing with his MOD regime?Sowda12 wrote:Rambie wrote:Sowda12 wrote:---
Decades later or not, he should have stepped down and allow
democracy to be revived again. Instead he played clans against eachother
wich indirectly lead to the current sitiuation. You did know he was still fighting
with SNF in Gedo even after his overthrow, which does not make him any different
from other any tribal leader.
I guess you're a kacaan orphan who was feed
all this shit about Somalia being a great country, well it wasn't.
If Somalia under his rule wassuch a great country, why SSDF, SNM, USC and half dozen other rebellion movements emerged?
That's the real question you're trying to hide by counting his few mediocre achievements.
My theory is that these rebellious groups were tribalist and only looking out for their own clan interest. Barre left in January 1991.
SNM declared independence from Somalia in May 91(?). Don't you see the pattern![]()
If all of these rebellious groups did love democracy so much, don't you think they would have been able to form one on their own after Barre left. If they cared about Somalia's well being, why did they not find a common ground, and make sure they formed a democracy.
Surely, one man(AUN) who died a long time ago, cannot be blamed for the failures of an entire nation![]()
If you did read, you will see that I agree with the fact that he should have stepped down. Fair enough.
But, the million dollar question is, did the various rebellious groups had the capacity to lead a whole nation on their own?
If yes, why is Somalia such a failed state now? If no, then it goes without saying that Somalia obviously as a nation, was better off under Barre.
Sowda12 wrote:Well, okay, it's a fact that all of the rebellious groups only cared about their own clan interest. It's obvious to anyone. Siad cared about the nation as a whole, hence why he invested more in other Somali cities and not his own.
Also, the MOD regime consisted of many people from different clans (Did you forget that many of the Isaaq leaders and elites of Somaliland used to work for Barre). Many men from minority clans also worked in the Barre government.One of the reasons why minorities support Siyad is because he treated them well and brought justice and equality to the Somali minorities that were previously marginalised.
1. Thus, Siyaad Barre was a visionary and fought for equality both for women and minorities
2. He made the standard national writing system and introduced the Somali language (Af Soomaali) as the official language of education.
3. Barre advocated the concept of a Greater Somalia (Hence, the Somalia-Ethiopia war in 77). He wanted to unite Somalia.
4. He created several farms and factories. Many of the ports in Somalia was built by him.
5. A strong, central government.
I can go on for days.
Barre led the nation for decades and under his rule we were known as "the white pearl of the indian ocean".
While the south is now a failed state, and the northernes are busy fleeing to the West despite having some peace, and looking to get internationally recognized for 25 years, and on top of that foreign countries are dictating over all of the Somali politicians and leaders.
He left in 91, so tell me, what have you guys achieved after he left?![]()
Aabe Siad Barre was a visionary and he had love for our nation Somalia.
Siad left with respect, honour and dignity. We appreciate and love him.
Allah ha u naxaristo Aabe
Rambie wrote:Sowda12 wrote:Well, okay, it's a fact that all of the rebellious groups only cared about their own clan interest. It's obvious to anyone. Siad cared about the nation as a whole, hence why he invested more in other Somali cities and not his own.
Also, the MOD regime consisted of many people from different clans (Did you forget that many of the Isaaq leaders and elites of Somaliland used to work for Barre). Many men from minority clans also worked in the Barre government.One of the reasons why minorities support Siyad is because he treated them well and brought justice and equality to the Somali minorities that were previously marginalised.
1. Thus, Siyaad Barre was a visionary and fought for equality both for women and minorities
2. He made the standard national writing system and introduced the Somali language (Af Soomaali) as the official language of education.
3. Barre advocated the concept of a Greater Somalia (Hence, the Somalia-Ethiopia war in 77). He wanted to unite Somalia.
4. He created several farms and factories. Many of the ports in Somalia was built by him.
5. A strong, central government.
I can go on for days.
Barre led the nation for decades and under his rule we were known as "the white pearl of the indian ocean".
While the south is now a failed state, and the northernes are busy fleeing to the West despite having some peace, and looking to get internationally recognized for 25 years, and on top of that foreign countries are dictating over all of the Somali politicians and leaders.
He left in 91, so tell me, what have you guys achieved after he left?![]()
Aabe Siad Barre was a visionary and he had love for our nation Somalia.
Siad left with respect, honour and dignity. We appreciate and love him.
Allah ha u naxaristo Aabe
If he was so visionary & loved his country
why did he didn't anticipated the rebellion movements
or step down for Somalia's sake? You just keep shooting yourself in the foot.
Just because he added few buildings to Xamar or got few puppet from other clans
in his gov doesn't mean he wasn't tribliest. Or else why would his gov be known by MOD? Yourself
ripping MOD more than Somalia lately. SL has almost all clans working 4 gov, does it mean Landers
are not tribliest? No it doesn't.
All the other stuff you you listed are
irrelevant aside from the Somali script. Somaliwayn? Really? ..... Do people still believe in this.
Bottom line is,
Siad Barre was a triblest leader and had a big rule in the current division & hostility
among Somalis. It's up to you if you wanna play dumb & believe you glorified delusions regarding Barre the savior.
mahoka wrote:Tanker aka sowda I don't mind a ruined somalia
So? You aboow used to work for Abdi RashidSowda12 wrote:---
Rambie wrote:So? You aboow used to work for Abdi RashidSowda12 wrote:---
but that didn't stop him from overthrowing his democratic gov
or abusing his people in Mudug later after his death.
Siad Barre didn't "leave" Somalia, he was forced from there
when he failed to retake Xamar twice with his militia. Just because
USC turned out to be useless shortsighted movement doesn't mean the rest of
apposition are alike (prime example SLAND) but it happened the capital was located
in their areas and hence the perpetual anarchy.
You would know about that, since Barre's policies of targeting and abusing Isaaq
is the reason why they took arms against him. Do you think we woke up some day and
decided to take down the gov for no reason?
Your argument does not make sense. Most of SNM funds did not come
from Ethiopia but rather diaspora. And what if rebel groups were funded from Ethiopia?
Siad Barre was getting free high end weapons on the name of whole Somalia from Soviets and later Americans.
Why targeting apposition for the external funding since aboow Siad is doing the same thing. Oh am sorry,
because being dictator makes it alright to get arms from all over the world to use on our people? How did he
protect the national security, by starting tribal vendetta and running off to Nigerian? The man you're worshiping
played every divide and conquer tactic in the book and used it against Somali clans only to flee when shit hits the fan.
But hey ........
And who funded & blindly supported WSLF?Sowda12 wrote:----