Re: Somaliland to reach an agreement with DP World
Posted: Thu May 05, 2016 1:43 pm
The more I think about this, the more DP world seems like the wrong choice 

Largest online Somali community!
http://www.somalinet.com/forums/
Very emotional ayaad tahay sxb. This victimhood is dangerous. Dp world will export islamism ideology and pursue pro Wanlawein ideology. I want to see the details tho.hangool79 wrote:mahoka wrote:What has it got to do with Islam, it is a business dealhangool79 wrote:I applaud this DP World is the better of the two, franciisku wa dad inkaar qabo oo Islaam iyo muslimiin neceb.
And if we manage to lock up South Sudan Deal, Central Africa and Ethiopia (30 %) we will eat well
Great job Silaanyo gov
Everything sxb, franciisku are some of the most vile haters of Islam and non-whiteness, also they have the second most heavy colonial baggage and might interfere in our country if we let them in. Ask all the west african countries currently suffering under french stealth operations killing and installing presidents at will from Tchad to Coat De ivoery
Waa axmaqiin. When they left countries they had colonised, they bulldozed all buildings, burned entire towns and cities. They even stripped copper wires and gates. They burned crops. They poisened wells. They destroyed all infrastructure.hangool79 wrote:GubanOgoHawdJSL wrote:Only if we can see the contract that would be nice or if they could expand the details of the agreement but dubai is safe bet.
I second this. But in reality even if the french offered a better sharing agreement I would still opt for DP World because the french waa gaalo adag who might try to cause turmoil in Sl if we disagree and try to sanction them, some of you less educated isaaqs should read how they behaved when they left their colonies, they destroyed everything of value and left nothing behind many countries who told them to fock off because they wanted to continue a pseduo coloniasm.
mahoka wrote:Before anything is signed we have to see the details. It is absolutely f-king stupid to have dp world controlling djibouti and berbera port, there won't be competition.
Siilanyo f-king us over again. Cm need to pick up their arms
That's always been the french imperalist character that's why you got be loyal like djbooty.TheFuturist wrote:Waa axmaqiin. When they left countries they had colonised, they bulldozed all buildings, burned entire towns and cities. They even stripped copper wires and gates. They burned crops. They poisened wells. They destroyed all infrastructure.hangool79 wrote:GubanOgoHawdJSL wrote:Only if we can see the contract that would be nice or if they could expand the details of the agreement but dubai is safe bet.
I second this. But in reality even if the french offered a better sharing agreement I would still opt for DP World because the french waa gaalo adag who might try to cause turmoil in Sl if we disagree and try to sanction them, some of you less educated isaaqs should read how they behaved when they left their colonies, they destroyed everything of value and left nothing behind many countries who told them to fock off because they wanted to continue a pseduo coloniasm.
If you cross them, waa bilaa naxariis. They will destroy you without thinking twice.
Are you a simpleton, at least ask for the details before spreading your ass for your arab mastershangool79 wrote:^ thank you theFuturist and guban
You guys understand my reasoning.
I say let DP World upgrade our port and enjoy the sweets for a limited period, then lets take it back. It's win win
mahoka wrote:Are you a simpleton, at least ask for the details before spreading your ass for your arab mastershangool79 wrote:^ thank you theFuturist and guban
You guys understand my reasoning.
I say let DP World upgrade our port and enjoy the sweets for a limited period, then lets take it back. It's win win
Typical low iq response, you are the reason why our country is a f-king shitholehangool79 wrote:mahoka wrote:Are you a simpleton, at least ask for the details before spreading your ass for your arab mastershangool79 wrote:^ thank you theFuturist and guban
You guys understand my reasoning.
I say let DP World upgrade our port and enjoy the sweets for a limited period, then lets take it back. It's win win
listen to this jaahil - we have a functioning government and smarter then we give ourselves credit for. Of course the details of the agreement are important, but I won't nag around about it on a forum you damn Ayaan male
The Bollore Group’s head office was searched by French officials as part of an investigation into the company’s port-operating contracts at two West African nations.
It is investigating whether Bollore’s public relations subsidiary Havas offered services to the leaders of Guinea and Togo. This was in order to help it secure contracts to operate two terminals; Lome Port in 2010 and Conkary in 2011.
A Bollore statement, released on April 12, 2016 denied the allegations and announced it was only a minority shareholder in Havas.
It stated: “With respect to its port activities, Bolloré Group would like to stress that these are considerable investments, carried out in partnership with other large international groups.”
“They represent commitments extending over many tens of years and for which they are selected, exclusively, according to the amount and technical qualities of the investments.”
Bollore currently operated 14 container terminals in Africa.
- See more at: http://www.portstrategy.com/news101/wor ... cpYuc.dpuf
ramzy2277 wrote:I second Hangool on this Ballore still uses the old french dirty tactics when it suits them, they even now under corruption investigation over some port deals in west africa.
The Bollore Group’s head office was searched by French officials as part of an investigation into the company’s port-operating contracts at two West African nations.
It is investigating whether Bollore’s public relations subsidiary Havas offered services to the leaders of Guinea and Togo. This was in order to help it secure contracts to operate two terminals; Lome Port in 2010 and Conkary in 2011.
A Bollore statement, released on April 12, 2016 denied the allegations and announced it was only a minority shareholder in Havas.
It stated: “With respect to its port activities, Bolloré Group would like to stress that these are considerable investments, carried out in partnership with other large international groups.”
“They represent commitments extending over many tens of years and for which they are selected, exclusively, according to the amount and technical qualities of the investments.”
Bollore currently operated 14 container terminals in Africa.
- See more at: http://www.portstrategy.com/news101/wor ... cpYuc.dpuf
Courtesy of our djboutian intel source sahan