gurey25 wrote:From fragments we assume from the ancients,
We know that they mastered the mysteries of turtle piss. This ether that surrounds the multiverse.
The source of the myth of vimanas dates to the precursors of the vedic civilisation and even sumer and kmt and pwenet
.
Unlike you, I was very invested into this spinning ball earth heliocentric masonic myth, I have an entire room filled with books from everything since a young child and even an expensive telescope to show for it
The only difference between us Gurey is that I have a critical mind swayed by facts not false indoctrination's, I take it you also believe in Evolution since it comes from the same masonic Godless source.
If your man enough I will debate you on this issue as someone that regularly posts on the international FE forums, about this endlessly revolving, rotating, tilting, spinning, shooting through infinite space ball earth myth.
The whole myth is 150 years old developed by proven Freemason Copernicus, in that short time we went through the following phases regarding the shape of the earth, lets begin this debate about the supposed shape first, we went from
1) circle/ball shaped (Copernicus)
2) Spherical (Pre WW)
3) Spheroid (this what I was thought in school)
4) Oblate Spheroid (flattened at the poles, last decade & current accepted shape by the masonic run science community)
5) Pear shaped ( flattened by the poles, latest by Neil De Grasse Tyson leading Astrophysicist as of this year)
This is the image supposedly taking by Apollo Hoax mission to the Moon several decades ago (proven to be fake, you can see this in photoshop)
This is the infamous 2014 Blue Marble image supposedly captured by sattelites by Rob Simmons (MR blue Marble whom admits it's photoshopped)
source:
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=84214
source where he admits it's photoshopped
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/abo ... immon.html
Visual difference between points 2) and 3) for the laymen
My question to you here is very simple, as everything here contradicts even the official images put out by NASA and their open claims they are CGI images
1) Which of those 5 shapes do you rest your faith on, you sticking to oblate spheroid this decade which is currently accepted by the community or the latest pear shaped by the leading astrophysicist?
2) Blue Marble Nasa image (2014) and the supposed Appolo image (60's) contradict each other and the present accepted shape (oblate spheroid), all 3 cannot be right, either the moon mission was a hoax, the oblate spheroid accepted shape is wrong or Rob Simmons Blue Marble official Nasa image (which he supposedly gathered info from Satellites) is a hoax
So which is it? at least 2 of them have to be a hoax, which begs the question why should I even begin to believe in the rest? please do not divert from this "shape" topic, we will move on to the others gradually.
Lol as I suspect I checked 79:30 and in Arabic it says. After that we have flattened the earth. Total opposite the claim. The muzzies are getting desperate.
