Ancient Egyptians related to Turks and Europeans, not Somalis

[Saar]

The mummies sampled where obviously hyksos settlers. The researchers admit this is not representative of all Egypt.

As the genetic material comes from just one site in Middle Egypt, the researchers said the study may not be representative for all of ancient Egyptians.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2017 ... ns/8572076

There you go

and Ancient Egypt stays in Africa.

[DaacasBiyo]

who cares?

I care

And you should too, because they want to rewrite not only history but the entire human race history in favor of the Europeans.

Reality
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_h ... on_fossils

What they claim
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 083548.htm

I guess this is their WE WUZ "JAWZ" N SHIET

[paperino]

What they found was very interesting. Over the 1,300-year period that the mummies represented, the researchers found that there was no real shift in genetics, suggesting that despite successive invasions and influxes of foreign people from all over Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, the population genetics stayed surprisingly stable.
http://www.iflscience.com/editors-blog/ ... egyptians/

Once again, the errant poster made another erroneous claim.

[Xildiiid]

^
Looking for blogpost to 'reaffirm' your pathetic beliefs.

[thelionwithfire]

What most of you are not understanding is that this is all propaganda. The reason why they want to white wash ancient Egyptians is so that the current fake 13th tribe Jews can pass as being real, despite the fact that 60% of modern day Israelis will suffer with skin cancer at some point in their life.

For these Khazar Ashkhenazis to be real Israelites, and hence hold up Israel as being legitimate, then all of history must be rewritten. They must turn the Ancient Egyptians into their Turkish counsins (Khazars were Turkic speaking people themselves).

In reality I the ancient Egyptians were just black Africans, so when the African Americans say We Wuz Kangs, they are actually not lying!

PREACH

Problem here is the whole 'we were kings' initiative was to reteach those enslaved that like all races and the africans were part of a people who had great kingdoms and rulers. That it wasn't a never was a white world.

This was then taken and turnt and tied to an unrelated nation, Ancient egypt, once people reliezed the Arabs and whites weren't their descendants. An extreme of the colonial definiton of 'black' was placed on the other side of the continent comopletley dismissing any native, non-arab, origin of egypt and forcing them to resembel the deep southern sudanese people. This narrative with the proof availble turnt the non-white or arab argument to non-white/arab but not black either. It allowed rationality to be skewed and racism to continue.
Because to be native african you must have ONE phenotype, ONE hair texture and ONE grouping for all the people of your continent.

It's an argument funded and propagated to ensure that any African nation tied to ancient egypt will be discredited no matter the evidence given african = one look and any other aren't 'african enough'. They weren't west african nor south sudanese. They didn't have the same culture, nothing more than commonalities due to distance. All african are similar but the only the closest should be mentioned here which are horn africans and the natives still present in egypt and aswan.

Somalis are the originators of a haplogroup found oddly in high numbers in nowhere other than egypt. They have a ton load giving indication of mixing with a group closely related to somalis. Thats proof enough.