why do Zoomalis claim history that isn't theirs?

Daily chitchat.

Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators

Forum rules
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
User avatar
Samsee
Posts: 211
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 5:03 pm

Re: why do Zoomalis claim history that isn't theirs?

Post by Samsee »

at lot of fake info in this thread, somalis have nothing to do with kush and there is no cultural and historic similarity between us and them, they spoke meroitic a yet to be deciphered language (which is probably nilo-saharan)

kerma spoke a cushitic language... so what? can serbians claim russian history? the somali ethnic group did not even exist at that time and language =/= ethnicity. I bet Kerma was populated by people closer to the egyptians as an ethnicity and they were not closely related to somalis

and I am highly skeptical as to ajuraan being ethnically somali (at least in the past) when a DNA test is done on them the truth will come to light

Somalis building civilizations in the past when they cannot pave a road in 2017 is ludicrous
User avatar
DaacasBiyo
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 1095
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 4:14 pm

Re: why do Zoomalis claim history that isn't theirs?

Post by DaacasBiyo »

Samsee wrote: Sun Sep 17, 2017 10:59 am at lot of fake info in this thread, somalis have nothing to do with kush and there is no cultural and historic similarity between us and them, they spoke meroitic a yet to be deciphered language (which is probably nilo-saharan)

kerma spoke a cushitic language... so what? can serbians claim russian history? the somali ethnic group did not even exist at that time and language =/= ethnicity. I bet Kerma was populated by people closer to the egyptians as an ethnicity and they were not closely related to somalis

and I am highly skeptical as to ajuraan being ethnically somali (at least in the past) when a DNA test is done on them the truth will come to light

Somalis building civilizations in the past when they cannot pave a road in 2017 is ludicrous
So this is what this Samsill calls defending his claim?
I've seen a mouse better defend her cheese than this retard claim this rat is making, no wonder he calls his own thread fake and runs away from it.


:pac:
User avatar
GIJaamac
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 4961
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 2:05 am

Re: why do Zoomalis claim history that isn't theirs?

Post by GIJaamac »

Samsee wrote: Sun Sep 17, 2017 10:59 am at lot of fake info in this thread, somalis have nothing to do with kush and there is no cultural and historic similarity between us and them, they spoke meroitic a yet to be deciphered language (which is probably nilo-saharan)

kerma spoke a cushitic language... so what? can serbians claim russian history? the somali ethnic group did not even exist at that time and language =/= ethnicity. I bet Kerma was populated by people closer to the egyptians as an ethnicity and they were not closely related to somalis

and I am highly skeptical as to ajuraan being ethnically somali (at least in the past) when a DNA test is done on them the truth will come to light

Somalis building civilizations in the past when they cannot pave a road in 2017 is ludicrous
Fuckin brutal !!!

Image
User avatar
DaacasBiyo
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 1095
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 4:14 pm

Re: why do Zoomalis claim history that isn't theirs?

Post by DaacasBiyo »

I think Samsill is you GIJane, you are trying to be sleek but I can smell a rat from a mile, specially a foofoo fed one.
Zoomalia4Cvcks
Posts: 234
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2017 3:47 pm

Re: why do Zoomalis claim history that isn't theirs?

Post by Zoomalia4Cvcks »

The guys right *Kanye shrug * can't even build roads in 2017, we might be the descendents of our ancestors but we clearly lost their strive for greatness. Sad . Somaliland is the only respectable region of "Somalia "
Gaashaanle1000
SomaliNetizen
SomaliNetizen
Posts: 930
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 11:17 am

Re: why do Zoomalis claim history that isn't theirs?

Post by Gaashaanle1000 »

Zoomalia4Cvcks, Samsee, GiJamac

All the same self hating loser.

Why don't the mods do something about this idiot.
Zoomalia4Cvcks
Posts: 234
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2017 3:47 pm

Re: why do Zoomalis claim history that isn't theirs?

Post by Zoomalia4Cvcks »

Gaashaanle1000 wrote: Sun Sep 17, 2017 2:35 pm Zoomalia4Cvcks, Samsee, GiJamac

All the same self hating loser.

Why don't the mods do something about this idiot.
Because we're not the same person our I.P.'s are proof you dumb monkey. Instead of crying like a kid how about you refute stuff. It's because you can't and you're fully aware of the embarrassment Zoomalia and your family pose to every somali everywhere, you're just too much a of pissy to deal with it instead you want people banned. Man up :sland: :up: :stylin:
User avatar
GIJaamac
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 4961
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 2:05 am

Re: why do Zoomalis claim history that isn't theirs?

Post by GIJaamac »

The answer is lack of great history and civilizations. The only history somali lamagoodles have is being slaves to arabs, xabashis, europeans and bantus and getting conquered by them. By the way the Ajuuraan dynasty who lamagoodles like to claim, were in fact bantus or at least their elite/leadership were. The current few Ajuuraan descendants scattered in southern somalia and NFD are the sheegatos of Ajuuraan confederation.
Lion104
Posts: 247
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2016 3:10 pm

Re: why do Zoomalis claim history that isn't theirs?

Post by Lion104 »

GIJaamac wrote: Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:41 pm The answer is lack of great history and civilizations. The only history somali lamagoodles have is being slaves to arabs, xabashis, europeans and bantus and getting conquered by them. By the way the Ajuuraan dynasty who lamagoodles like to claim, were in fact bantus or at least their elite/leadership were. The current few Ajuuraan descendants scattered in southern somalia and NFD are the sheegatos of Ajuuraan confederation.
Your ancestors were nothing more than slaves who worked on the field. And that's your position in Somali society for eternity. Kulaha Ajuuran which is a Samaale tribe are Bantus. This is worse than African Americans who claim Egypt.

:damn:

The Ajuuran were the ones who first purchased your ancestors from Tanzania/Mozambique.
Zoomalia4Cvcks
Posts: 234
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2017 3:47 pm

Re: why do Zoomalis claim history that isn't theirs?

Post by Zoomalia4Cvcks »

LMAO stupid f-king bantu. Southern somalis are weak for not cleansing themselves of Bantu's. Bantu's are an invading force much like what the oromo is trying to do in Somaliland and other northern somali regions. Except those in the north have made it clear they will kill every oromo if they don't stop trying to fuck with the somali population
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “General - General Discussions”