we are wining and only care about our interests!

[Canuck2]

[quote=Smile-LiKe-SuN-RiSE post_id=4985573 time=<a href="tel:1599761076">1599761076</a> user_id=119739]
So reer cambuulo have been reduced to sucking up to two darood governors lol
The embarrassment..war have some pride waryada ,.either be straight up mucaarad or work with the man in charge.

i have won. now enjoying your SAHAL infighting on social media

So reer Cambulo are always fighting on social media too ..what is your point
You won ?
So humiliation is a win now ?

Anyway, thanks for showing your rotten cuqdad
Mr ‘I am not into qabil politics ‘I am just political analyst with open degree ‘

Yaahu walle xaasid waligi guulaysan maayo

im federalist, believe in HAG region just like SL and PL i dont believe federal shit at all even under HAG president i believe in decentralization and Banaadir state so i have nothing against you as JL or PL. that is the real qabyaalad not being deegaanist so im talking about Xoogaga and the larger SAHAL base not clans or individuals.

Somalia after Nubar iyo Naxdin is heading toward disunity and confederalism like libya. central Somalia and southwest and Mogadishu will form one zone. we may have new tribal power sharing like lebanon to ensure political stability in Xamar in excgange of some FMS preserving autonomy. im in secret HAG society and they saying they will never...do again.

lebanon has sectarian powersharing. president and army leaders and the capital belong to the christians HAG should be like them
https://www.euronews.com/2019/10/21/how ... ws-answers

Capital is stable bc of the christians and all army leaders and defence are christians and druze from the region



capital is christian with druz(muslum in name but they dont pry and have different prophets) that is is why beirut is stable.

shia have their own hibullah army and control their region in cooperation with Syria

sunna are isolated politically allied with Saudi arbnia they have the pm but his shia FM supports Iran!

shia have the speaker but they control the cabinet and are allied with the christoans .
[/quote]

Capital of Lebanon is shared city, east Beirut is Christian area(port area). West Beirut is which the fancy are is Muslim area. This division happened at 70s & during war. My mother’s Lebanese friend told her in 91 that we shouldn’t have left Mogadishu & divided like them instead of leaving the country. Something else, 4.5 system in Lebanon, Iraq & Afghanistan had failed, the people had rejected this type of system in Iraq the Shia are protesting for kicking out this system. Lebanon is failed country that requested the return of France ‘s colonial back. Also the Christian numbers are decreasing & whole coin country is controlled by Muslim (Shia & Sunni) Sunni has the money & Shia has army which is more powerful than their country’s army. For example the Christian had to wait 3 years for approval of president by Muslim. Also the president’s position is symbolic & doesn’t rule unlike the prime minister who has the full control of country. The Shia head of parliament is symbolic position. The true power is with hezbollah military who have strong military but are useless since the money is with Sunni. Last, in Afghanistan 4.5 system will end since Taliban won the battle.
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.nytimes ... n.amp.html

[sahal80]

why not stay then?

my friend Sunni had no power in West Beirut it was the PLO(Palestine Liberation Organization) and then it was controlled by Syria from 1976 to 2005 and the UN Arab peacekeeping forces even Sudan had forces in there and met too much racism

1982 israel invaded and united Beirut under the Christian president bashir gemayel

finally syria get rid of the PLO then its occupation of lebanon was endorsed by the USA. Syria Saved alot of isolated christian villages in the south from the palestinians and assad get rid of the PLO in the south he was protecting Israel. to this day christians like Syrias Assad. yes Beirut is divided on christian and sunni and shia(southern suburb known as الضاحية hisbullah stronghold) but without the Syrian intervention they wouldnt coexist. this war started as a war between right wing christians and leftist palestinians. syria came to support the christian right wing president Bashir Gemayel who was leading the govt the same way Ethiopia used the tfg in 2006 but soon Syria started deploying divide and conquer tactics so it can stay forever. they created new pro Syria Arab Nationalist and shia camp from all groups except the palestinians so the christian president resorted to Israel in 1982 and got assassinated by pro Syrian group. in early 90s there was new power sharing agreement in Daif Saudi arabia wich transfered the real power to a sunni pm while christians have the president and more influence in the army wich gets trained and funded by france but now Iran and Syria fucked up that System after UN ordered the Syrian troops to leave it in 2005 after the assassination of anti Syira pm rafiq al hariri. the pm now doesnt control his cabinet there r pro Iran and Syria ministers and he cant fire them bc they will come up with motion. pro Iran FM supports Iran and Syria and never attends Arab league meetings!

https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... of_Lebanon



https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_ ... _Civil_War


https://honestreporting.com/tag/bachir-gemayel/
military map back then do you see sunnis or palestinians.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_ ... t%20Beirut.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Beirut

[Voltage]

why not stay then?

my friend Sunni had no power in West Beirut it was the PLO(Palestine Liberation Organization) and then it was controlled by Syria from 1976 to 2005 and the UN Arab peacekeeping forces even Sudan had forces in there and met too much racism

1982 israel invaded and united Beirut under the Christian president bashir gemayel

finally syria get rid of the PLO then its occupation of lebanon was endorsed by the USA. Syria Saved alot of isolated christian villages in the south from the palestinians and assad get rid of the PLO in the south he was protecting Israel. to this day christians like Syrias Assad. yes Beirut is divided on christian and sunni and shia(southern suburb known as الضاحية hisbullah stronghold) but without the Syrian intervention they wouldnt coexist. this war started as a war between right wing christians and leftist palestinians. syria came to support the christian right wing president Bashir Gemayel who was leading the govt the same way Ethiopia used the tfg in 2006 but soon Syria started deploying divide and conquer tactics so it can stay forever. they created new pro Syria Arab Nationalist and shia camp from all groups except the palestinians so the christian president resorted to Israel in 1982 and got assassinated by pro Syrian group. in early 90s there was new power sharing agreement in Daif Saudi arabia wich transfered the real power to a sunni pm while christians have the president and more influence in the army wich gets trained and funded by france but now Iran and Syria fucked up that System after UN ordered the Syrian troops to leave it in 2005 after the assassination of anti Syira pm rafiq al hariri. the pm now doesnt control his cabinet there r pro Iran and Syria ministers and he cant fire them bc they will come up with motion. pro Iran FM supports Iran and Syria and never attends Arab league meetings!

https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... of_Lebanon



https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_ ... _Civil_War


https://honestreporting.com/tag/bachir-gemayel/
military map back then do you see sunnis or palestinians.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_ ... t%20Beirut.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Beirut

You did exactly what I described you do when the engagement is directly as I had described it.

You yield at that moment; only to slyly regroup to shower us with a multi-prong full frontal assault from high altitude all week long.

Sahal, what I did is called passive-aggressive.

I wanted to show you how YOU consistently operate; "Oh I am not attacking your clan or anything" while the information posted was directly and intentionally posted because of you.

Finally, I to get this across one las time since this viewpoint is problematic.

contrary it was you who did to my baladweyne floodplain thread to what yiyr doing now to this thread with your completely unrelated input

Sahal, the Beled-Weyne floodplain topic

1. Was not owned by you. We do not own any topic in a discussion forum. I will contribute to any topic opened by you if I choose and, if you choose, you have every right to contribute to any topic from me or anyone else.

2. The general rule, across the board, for discussion is don't troll and don't be malicious----between those almost everything can come under including good conduct and staying on topic.

3. My response to your flood plain topic was the DEFINITION of staying on topic and my conduct was without remiss.

4. There is virtually nothing to subtantiate the anti-democratic anti-free speech description of my contribution to that topic EXCEPT to arbitrarily impose restrictions based on "personal like or dislike."

5. Stop comparing speech that comes from good intention and follows forum rules like the fllodplain to legitimize your passive aggressive and ill-intentioned topics directly motivated by clan attacks.

Even then I have never even considered limiting your speech either through forum complaining or telling you where and what to post.

Quite literally, I will reiterate this is just my opinion and advice.

But do go on, like your later moment of sanity to try to salvage the schoolchildren low moment, I have noticed you sometimes do require a bit of time for rationality to come back. I'll take that over hopeless any day.